scholarly journals A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Fat Plug Myringoplasty and Conventional Myringoplasty in Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media with Small Central Perforation

2018 ◽  
Vol 71 (S2) ◽  
pp. 1197-1201
Author(s):  
N. Dhanapala ◽  
B. Ramya ◽  
L. Sudarshan Reddy
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjeev Kumar Thakur ◽  
Nisha Ghimire ◽  
Rabin Acharya ◽  
Sanjay Kumar Singh ◽  
Anwar Afaque

Background: Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) is the chronic inflammation of the middle ear cleft. The atticoantral type is called unsafe type because of the associated complications due to granulations and cholesteatoma which may be life-threatening. CSOM with central perforation (tubotympanic type) is usually not associated with major complications such as cholesteatoma formation.Aims and Objectives: To find out the intraoperative pathological findings in cases of CSOM with central perforation (tubotympanic type)Materials and Methods: This descriptive, cross sectional study has been conducted in the Department of Ear, Biratnagar Eye Hospital in Nepal over 2 years. Study group includes 172 patients having CSOM with central perforations in the tympanic membranes who underwent different types of procedures. Preoperatively, all the patients were evaluated with otoscopy, microscopy, pure-tone audiometry, and some patients with computed tomography scan. The pathological findings were confirmed with biopsy. The findings were tabulated and analysed.Results: 21(12.2%) patients were having dry central perforation with normal Eustachian tube function.  95 patients, i.e., 55.23% were having granulations in attic, aditus, antrum.  25 (14.53%) cases were having ossicular erosion.5 (2.9%) cases had tympanosclerosis in middle ear. 1 (0.58%) case had facial nerve dehiscence. 16 (9.3%) cases had oedema of middle ear mucosa/aural polyp from middle ear. Surprisingly 9 patients, i.e., 5.23% were having cholesteatoma which was confirmed by histopathological study.Conclusion: This study shows that cholesteatoma can be found in tubotympanic type of CSOM, along with other pathological findings. Hence it is on the part of the surgeon to be careful while planning surgery on their patients with CSOM (tubotympanic type), remembering that all safe CSOM might not always be safe. Asian Journal of Medical Sciences Vol.8(1) 2017 42-47


Author(s):  
Amitkumar Rathi ◽  
Vinod Gite ◽  
Sameer Bhargava ◽  
Neeraj Shetty

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">The main objective of the study was to assess and compare the graft uptake, hearing improvement, complications in large, subtotal, and anterior moderate perforations by each technique viz; superiorly based circumferential tympanomeatal flap tympanoplasty (STT)/full cuff and anterior anchoring flap tympanoplasty (AAT)/anterior tucking. </span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">In our study of 30 cases age group in the range of 10 years to 60 years. The mean air bone gap for the 8 patients with anterior moderate perforation was 31.75 db, for 17 patients with large central perforations was 38.75 db and for 5 patients with subtotal perforations was 41.4 db.  </span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">Mean air bone gap closure after 3 months of surgery in the STT group was 21.4 db while that after 6months of the surgery for the same group was 22.06 db. Mean air bone gap closure after 3 months of surgery in the AAT group was 18.2 db while that after 6months of the surgery for the same group was 18.73 db. </span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">Comparing the air bone gap closure in patients who underwent surgery by AAT and STT technique we found that there is no statistical difference. Both techniques (viz: superiorly based circumferential tympanomeatal flap tympanoplasty and anteriorly anchoring flap tympanoplasty) can be used for the repair of large, subtotal, and anterior tympanic membrane central perforations in chronic suppurative otitis media of mucosal type.</span></p>


2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
ManasRanjan Rout ◽  
Diganta Mohanty ◽  
Y Vijaylaxmi ◽  
B Kamalesh ◽  
M Chakradhar

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document