Modified Wound Closure Technique in de Quervain’s Tenosynovitis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew R. Zeiderman ◽  
Laura A. Sonoda ◽  
Eileen N. Phan ◽  
Robert M. Szabo
Keyword(s):  
Wound Closure ◽  
Closure Technique ◽  
De Quervain’S Tenosynovitis

Continuous suturing as a wound closure technique for circumcisions

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 470-473
Author(s):  
Manoj Ravindraanandan ◽  
Herman Fernando ◽  
Shahjahan Aslam
Keyword(s):  
Male Circumcision ◽  
Wound Closure ◽  
Suture Technique ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Continuous Suture ◽  
Single Institution ◽  
Closure Technique ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Operative Complications ◽  
Low Incidence

Male circumcision is an extremely common urological procedure worldwide, with many variations in technique. Despite the large volume there is a low incidence of complications associated with circumcisions, with the majority being Clavien-Dindo I or II. In this study, we analyse the outcomes and complication rates associated with a continuous wound closure following a male circumcision. Methods: In a urology department from a single institution, 201 male circumcisions with a continuous wound closure were performed in a 4-year period. Outcomes were analysed retrospectively looking at postoperative complications and readmissions to hospital via our clinical portal. Results: No patients had complications that required admission or re-operation at our institution. Conclusion: No major post-operative complications were observed from our cohort. There were also no documented admissions back to our institution with wound healing complications. However, a limitation is that Clavien-Dindo I and II complications and treatment at general practitioner surgeries were not captured and may not accurately represent our complication rates quoted. Nevertheless, we can conclude from these data that closure for a circumcision using a continuous suture technique gives favourable outcomes with acceptable complication rates. Level of evidence: Not applicable for this multicentre audit.

scholarly journals S-shaped Wound Closure Technique for Dumbbell-shaped Keloids

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. e1278
Author(s):  
Seiji Komatsu ◽  
Shougo Azumi ◽  
Yuko Hayashi ◽  
Tsuneharu Morito ◽  
Yoshihiro Kimata
Keyword(s):  
Wound Closure ◽  
Closure Technique

Effect of Wound Closure Technique on Wound Infection in the Morbidly Obese: results of a randomized trial

1991 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raphael Chung ◽  
Marion Schertzer ◽  
David Fromm ◽  
Robert Kozol
Keyword(s):  
Wound Infection ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Wound Closure ◽  
Morbidly Obese ◽  
Closure Technique

Influence of abdominal-wound closure technique on complications after surgery: a randomised study

The Lancet ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 353 (9164) ◽  
pp. 1563-1567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur HP Niggebrugge ◽  
J Baptist Trimbos ◽  
Jo Hermans ◽  
Willem-Hans Steup ◽  
Cornelis JH Van De Velde
Keyword(s):  
Wound Closure ◽  
Abdominal Wound ◽  
Closure Technique ◽  
Randomised Study

scholarly journals A clinical study of continuous and interrupted fascial closure in emergency midline laparotomy at a tertiary care centre

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 2014
Author(s):  
Rahul D. Kunju ◽  
Vinayak Thakkannavar ◽  
Shrivathsa Merta K. ◽  
Sachin H. G. ◽  
Allen Netto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Wound Closure ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Fascial Closure ◽  
Emergency Laparotomy ◽  
Closure Technique ◽  
Burst Abdomen ◽  
Midline Laparotomy ◽  
Laparotomy Wound

Background: Commonest approach in emergency open abdominal surgeries remains to be midline laparotomy because it is simple, saves time and causes minimal blood loss. Optimal technique for laparotomy wound closure has been a topic of debate since long. Risk factors for development of incisional hernia and burst abdomen are wound infection, systemic illnesses of patient and closure technique. Factors related to patients like age, gender, body mass index (BMI), systemic illnesses are not modifiable when an emergency laparotomy is the only option. Hence closure technique is one factor where surgeon has total control, which can bring down the incidence of burst abdomen and incisional hernias.Methods: Prospective study conducted in 150 patients who underwent emergency midline laparotomy from December 2014 to February 2016 in Krishna Rajendra Hospital attached to Mysore Medical College and Research Institute, Mysore, Karnataka, India with 6 months’ follow-up after surgery.Results: Most of patients in the study belonged to 30-40-year group and were males (78%). Gastrointestinal perforation peritonitis (52%) was the single most common indication for emergency midline laparotomy. In the continuous and interrupted groups, post-operative wound infection was found in 54.6% and 34.6%, wound dehiscence was found in 16% and 6.6% and incisional hernia in 14.4% and 4% respectively.Conclusions: Interrupted suturing is superior to continuous technique in emergency midline laparotomy wound closure in terms of complications and post-operative morbidity.

scholarly journals Mass closure versus layered closure of midline laparotomy incisions: a prospective comparative study

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santoshkumar N. Deshmukh ◽  
Audumbar N. Maske
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Wound Closure ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Closure Technique ◽  
Midline Laparotomy ◽  
Mass Closure ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
Laparotomy Wound ◽  
Closure Group

Background: The ideal method of abdominal wound closure remains to be discovered. It should be technically so simple that the results are as good in the hands of a trainee as in those of the master surgeon. The best abdominal closure technique should be fast, easy, and cost effective while preventing both early and late complications. Present study is undertaken to compare the two methods (Mass closure and Layered closure) of laparotomy wound closure in relation to post-operative complications, time for wound closure and cost effectiveness in both groups and also to decide the most effective method among the two.Methods: This prospective comparative study was conducted in department of surgery at a tertiary care teaching hospital at Solapur (Maharashtra) from January 2006 to January 2009. On admission, patients suspected of having intraabdominal pathology, a thorough clinical e and general assessment was done. Necessary radiological and biochemical investigations were done to support the diagnosis. After confirmation of diagnosis patients were subjected for exploratory laparotomy. The laparotomy wound was closed with either by Mass closure or Layered closure technique. Patients were followed up for 6 months in post-operative period for detection late complications.Results: Total 60 patients of were studied. Majority of patients were in 61 to 65 age group. Male outnumbered the females. Incidence of early complications like seroma, wound infection is more in layered closure group as compared to mass closure. Mean wound closure time is more in layered closure group. Mass closure technique is more cost effective than layered closure group.Conclusions: Mass closure technique is less time consuming, more cost effective and safe for closure of midline laparotomy incisions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document