Development of an Anisotropic Failure Criterion for Characterising the Influence of Curvature on Forming Limits of Aluminium Sheet Metal Alloys

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (S1) ◽  
pp. 1175-1178 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Liewald ◽  
R. Schleich
Author(s):  
Christian Jaremenko ◽  
Xiaolin Huang ◽  
Emanuela Affronti ◽  
Marion Merklein ◽  
Andreas Maier

2007 ◽  
Vol 344 ◽  
pp. 511-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Bambach ◽  
M. Todorova ◽  
Gerhard Hirt

Asymmetric incremental sheet forming (AISF) is a relatively new manufacturing process for the production of low volumes of sheet metal parts. Forming is accomplished by the CNC controlled movements of a simple ball-headed tool that follows a 3D trajectory to gradually shape the sheet metal blank. Due to the local plastic deformation under the tool, there is almost no draw-in from the flange region to avoid thinning in the forming zone. As a consequence, sheet thinning limits the amount of bearable deformation, and thus the range of possible applications. Much attention has been given to the maximum strains that can be attained in AISF. Several authors have found that the forming limits are considerably higher than those obtained using a Nakazima test and that the forming limit curve is approximately a straight line (mostly having a slope of -1) in the stretching region of the FLD. Based on these findings they conclude that the “conventional” forming limit curves cannot be used for AISF and propose dedicated tests to record forming limit diagrams for AISF. Up to now, there is no standardised test and no evaluation procedure for the determination of FLCs for AISF. In the present paper, we start with an analysis of the range of strain states and strain paths that are covered by the various tests that can be found in the literature. This is accomplished by means of on-line deformation measurements using a stereovision system. From these measurements, necking and fracture limits are derived. It is found that the fracture limits can be described consistently by a straight line with negative slope. The necking limits seem to be highly dependent on the test shapes and forming parameters. It is concluded that standardisation in both testing conditions and the evaluation procedures is necessary, and that a forming limit curve does not seem to be an appropriate tool to predict the feasibility of a given part design.


2015 ◽  
Vol 132 ◽  
pp. 342-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.B. Silva ◽  
A.J. Martínez-Donaire ◽  
G. Centeno ◽  
D. Morales-Palma ◽  
C. Vallellano ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Shuhui Li ◽  
Ji He ◽  
Z. Cedric Xia ◽  
Danielle Zeng ◽  
Bo Hou

A bifurcation analysis of forming limits for an orthotropic sheet metal is presented in this paper. The approach extends Stören and Rice's (S–R) bifurcation analysis for isotropic materials, with materials following a vertex theory of plasticity at the onset of localized necking. The sheet orthotropy is represented by the Hill’48 yield criterion with three r-values in the rolling (r0), the transverse (r90) and the diagonal direction (r45). The emphasis of the study is on the examination of r-value effect on the sheet metal forming limit, expressed as a combination of the average r-value raverage and the planar anisotropy (Δr). Forming limits under both zero extension assumption and minimum extension assumption as well as necking band orientation evolution are investigated in detail. The comparison between the experimental result and predicted forming limit diagram (FLD) is presented to validate the extended bifurcation analysis. The r-value effect is observed under uniaxial and equal-biaxial loadings. However, no difference is found under plane strain condition in strain-based FLD which is consistent with Hill's theory. The force maximum criterion is also used to analyze FLD for verification.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document