Incorporating the Results of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 Trial into Clinical Practice

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Mittendorf ◽  
Tari A. King
2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle M. Fillion ◽  
Katherine E. Glass ◽  
Joe Hayek ◽  
Allison Wehr ◽  
Gary Phillips ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (7) ◽  
pp. 1133-1137
Author(s):  
Emma G. Rooney ◽  
Margaret M. Fleming ◽  
Jay G. Patel ◽  
Kelly Clifford ◽  
Chaejin Kim ◽  
...  

Patients often receive axillary ultrasound-biopsy (AUS-B) before clinical evaluation. One positive biopsy in the absence of palpable disease rarely indicates additional nodal involvement, but it eliminates patients from being managed by the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial criteria. To determine which patients may benefit from AUS-B, we analyzed whether characteristics on AUS were associated with large-volume axillary disease and, thus, the need for axillary lymph node (LN) dissection. A retrospective review identified patients who met Z0011 criteria and underwent AUS. Clinicopathologic and ultrasound characteristics were compared between patients with ≤2 versus ≥3 positive LNs. Two hundred and seven patients with cT1-2N0 tumors underwent preoperative AUS and breast-conserving surgery. On multivariate analysis, three AUS combinations were associated with ≥3 positive LNs: cortical thickness (CT) > 4 mm + loss of fatty hilum + round shape (P = 0.0218), CT > 4 mm + loss of fatty hilum (P = 0.0211), and CT > 4 mm + round shape (P = 0.0155). Preoperative axillary LN biopsy in patients with a single abnormal LN characteristic on AUS may be unnecessary because a positive finding will eliminate management according to Z0011 criteria. Cortical thickness >4 mm combined with any other abnormal characteristic was associated with ≥3 positive LNs, supporting the performance of AUS-B in this population.


JAMA Surgery ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 150 (12) ◽  
pp. 1141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Audrey H. Choi ◽  
Summer Blount ◽  
Mia N. Perez ◽  
Carlos E. Chavez de Paz ◽  
Samuel A. Rodriguez ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1103-1103
Author(s):  
Jun Wang ◽  
Elizabeth Ann Mittendorf ◽  
Aysegul A. Sahin ◽  
Min Yi ◽  
Abigail Suzanne Caudle ◽  
...  

1103 Background: The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 trial demonstrated that, for patients with clinical T1-T2, N0 breast cancer and one or two positive sentinel lymph nodes undergoing breast conserving therapy, there was no difference in local-regional recurrence (LRR), disease-free survival or overall survival (OS) between patients who underwent sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) alone or completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). However, there were a limited number of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) participants (7%) in the study. In addition, it is known that ILC has a different pattern of metastases, frequently presenting as small foci requiring immunohistochemistry for detection. Together, these considerations raise concern regarding the applicability of the ACOSOG Z0011 data to patients with ILC. Methods: Patients with ILC who met the ACOSOG Z0011 eligibility criteria were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1998-2009). Patients were evaluated based on the extent of axillary surgery: SLND alone or ALND. Clinicaloutcomes of the two groups were compared. Results: At a median follow-up of 71 months, there were no LRRs in the SLND arm, and only 4 (0.45%) in the ALND arm. There were no differences in OS or disease-specific survival between the two groups. Conclusions: Omission of completion ALND is appropriate in patients with ILC who fulfill the ACOSOG Z0011 eligibility criteria.


JAMA Surgery ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 150 (12) ◽  
pp. 1148
Author(s):  
Kimberly Stone ◽  
Amanda J. Wheeler

2013 ◽  
Vol 83 (12) ◽  
pp. 924-928 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas K. Ngui ◽  
Elisabeth E. Elder ◽  
Upali W. Jayasinghe ◽  
James French

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document