scholarly journals European Reference Networks: challenges and opportunities

Author(s):  
Birute Tumiene ◽  
Holm Graessner ◽  
Irene MJ Mathijssen ◽  
Alberto M Pereira ◽  
Franz Schaefer ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 318-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Morciano ◽  
Paola Laricchiuta ◽  
Domenica Taruscio ◽  
Holger Schünemann

2013 ◽  
Vol 60 (Supplementum-VIII) ◽  
pp. 10-15
Author(s):  
L. Kovács ◽  
E. Hegyi ◽  
G. Nagyová

The paper briefly describes the role of Orphanet as an informational and educational source for rare diseases. Most attention is given to the Centres of Expertise and European Reference Networks. The authors suggest an easy procedure how to get the basic data about the readiness of the clinics to be recognised for Centres of Expertise at the national level. EUCERD recommendations on quality criteria for centres of expertise are introduced. The coordinators of the potential Centres of Expertise should be contacted and asked to fill in the questionnaire designed to check whether the centre matches the EUCERD recommendations or not. In order for the process to be transparent, the selection criteria of expert resources are listed on national website (www.orphanet.sk). The analysis of the questionnaires has to be carried out at the national level, to map the basic data about the current status. One questionnaire per department or clinic shall be filled in order to allow the evaluation. Clinics will be divided in two groups the ones which achieved the threshold and could be recognised as Centres of Expertise at the National level and the ones which need to be further monitored to reach the threshold.


2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla E. M. Hollak ◽  
Marieke Biegstraaten ◽  
Matthias R. Baumgartner ◽  
Nadia Belmatoug ◽  
Bruno Bembi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosaria Talarico ◽  
Sara Cannizzo ◽  
Valentina Lorenzoni ◽  
Diana Marinello ◽  
Ilaria Palla ◽  
...  

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.


2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (05) ◽  
pp. 388-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Anzelewicz ◽  
Claus Petersen ◽  
Piotr Czauderna ◽  
Rene Wijnen

AbstractEuropean Reference Networks (ERNs) are virtual networks that involve healthcare providers across Europe. The aim of ERNs is to tackle complex or rare diseases and conditions that necessitate highly specialized treatment, knowledge and resources.This article summarizes the concept of European Reference Networks in the European Union, legislation and policy behind ERNs from the standpoint of pediatric surgical specialty. There are seven ERNs in which pediatric surgeons are involved, four of which are being discussed, namely ERN PaedCan, eUROGEN ERN, ERN RARE-LIVER and ERNICA. ERNs program is a step towards improving health care quality, reducing access inequalities, and increasing overall medical experience and knowledge but its final impact is yet to be determined.


Endocrine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 549-554
Author(s):  
Isabel Mönig ◽  
Danielle Steenvoorden ◽  
Johan P. de Graaf ◽  
S. Faisal Ahmed ◽  
Domenica Taruscio ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose The core task of European Reference Networks (ERNs) is to reduce health care inequalities throughout Europe for all patients with rare and complex conditions. A secure web-based application for virtual consultations, the Clinical Patient Management System (CPMS), was developed by the EU to provide expert specialized care for all these patients. This review analyses the opportunities and difficulties that the implementation of this virtual network implies for physicians as well as for the patients. Methods European Reference Network on Rare Endocrine Conditions (Endo-ERN) installed an Operational Helpdesk (OH) to support their members in using CPMS. The OH initiated several actions to facilitate and increase the usage of CPMS. Satisfaction with the system and reasons for low participation rates in virtual case discussions were analyzed by different surveys. Results The number of CPMS users increased constantly, but the active usage of the system remains insufficient. Main reasons were technical difficulties, lack of time and insufficient awareness about CPMS in experts and patients throughout Europe. Still, outcomes of the virtual discussions are considered useful by involved experts and the discussions have provided topics for educational webinars and research. Conclusions CPMS is a secure system with many advantages compared to previous ways of consulting experts but also difficulties that need to be overcome with future strategies. By facilitating its use and increasing awareness among all relevant European experts and patients, CPMS can help to make the existing expertise available for all patients with rare (endocrine) conditions throughout Europe as it was intended.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document