scholarly journals FDG PET/CT and Conventional Imaging Methods in Cancer of Unknown Primary: an Approach to Overscanning

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (6) ◽  
pp. 438-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neslihan Cetin Avci ◽  
Filiz Hatipoglu ◽  
Ahmet Alacacıoglu ◽  
Emine Ebru Bayar ◽  
Gonca Gul Bural
2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 65
Author(s):  
Jun-Eul Hwang ◽  
Ju-Young Yoon ◽  
Woo-Kyun Bae ◽  
Hyun-Jeong Shim ◽  
Ik-Joo Chung

Medicine ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 96 (16) ◽  
pp. e6713 ◽  
Author(s):  
Synne Alexandra Burglin ◽  
Søren Hess ◽  
Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen ◽  
Oke Gerke

2013 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natale Quartuccio ◽  
Giorgio Treglia ◽  
Marco Salsano ◽  
Maria Vittoria Mattoli ◽  
Barbara Muoio ◽  
...  

Background.The objective of this study is to systematically review the role of positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) with Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in patients with osteosarcoma (OS).Methods. A comprehensive literature search of published studies through October 10th, 2012 in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus databases regarding whole-body FDG-PET and FDG-PET/CT in patients with OS was performed.Results. We identified 13 studies including 289 patients with OS. With regard to the staging and restaging of OS, the diagnostic performance of FDG-PET and PET/CT seem to be high; FDG-PET and PET/CT seem to be superior to bone scintigraphy and conventional imaging methods in detecting bone metastases; conversely, spiral CT seems to be superior to FDG-PET in detecting pulmonary metastases from OSConclusions.Metabolic imaging may provide additional information in the evaluation of OS patients. The combination of FDG-PET or FDG-PET/CT with conventional imaging methods seems to be a valuable tool in the staging and restaging of OS and may have a relevant impact on the treatment planning.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2076-2076
Author(s):  
Emilie Le Rhun ◽  
Michael Weller ◽  
Anna Sophie Berghoff ◽  
Elisabeth Jane Rushing ◽  
Lisa Fuereder ◽  
...  

2076 Background: Brain metastasis (BM) are the first clinical presentation of cancer in around 30% of patients. They are then referred as BM from cancer of unknown primary site (BM-CUPS). The value of 18F-fluordesoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)/CT has not yet be determined for the management of these patients. Methods: A total of 566 patients were operated for BM at the University Hospital Zurich between 2004 and 2014, of whom 127 were identified as BM-CUPS patients. Two cohorts from other independent centers (n = 100 and 120) were used for the validation of data. Results: No difference in determining the localization of the primary lesion was observed between FDG-PET/CT and CT (FDG-PET/CT: 73/78, 93.6%; CT: n = 70/78, 89.7%; p = 0.25, McNemar’s test). The same pattern of primary lesion and other extracranial lesions was observed in 36 of 64 patients (56.3%). Additional suspicious extracranial metastases were identified by FDG-PET/CT in 28 patients (43.7%). The median graded prognostic assessment (GPA) scores were 2.5 determined according to FDG-PET/CT and 3 according to CT alone (p = 3.8x10-5), resulting in predicted survival times of 3.8 versus 5.3 months (p = 6.1x10-5; Wilcoxon’s test). Conclusions: A similar sensitivity of FDG-PET/CT and chest CT was observed for the detection of the primary tumor in BM-CUPS, however, FDG-PET/CT significantly improved the accuracy of staging. FDG-PET/CT should be preferred for the management of BM-CUPS and may help to avoid redundant CT imaging.


2021 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 223
Author(s):  
Y. Benameur ◽  
S. Nabih Oueriagli ◽  
O. Ait Sahel ◽  
J. El Bekkali ◽  
A. Doudouh

Author(s):  
Nagabhushan Seshadri ◽  
Gaurav Malhotra

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document