Comparison of the Keystone flap and the Limberg flap technique in the surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus disease

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akin Calisir ◽  
Ilhan Ece
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Pilonidal Sinus ◽  
Pilonidal Sinus Disease ◽  
Limberg Flap ◽  
Sinus Disease ◽  
Flap Technique

Pilonidal sinus disease: Karydakis flap procedure in our patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (8) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Wound Healing ◽  
Pilonidal Sinus ◽  
Healing Process ◽  
Pilonidal Sinus Disease ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Limberg Flap ◽  
New Disease ◽  
Sinus Disease ◽  
Flap Procedure

Introduction: Despite the available guidelines, opinions of many surgeons are quite ambiguous when it comes to the therapy of pilonidal sinus disease. The treatment can be a frustrating problem both for the surgeon and the patient because it is associated with wound complications and high recurrence rate. The objective of this study was to analyze the results of patients with pilonidal sinus disease undergoing the Karydakis flap procedure. Methods: A total of 27 patients treated for primary and recurrent pilonidal disease using the Karydakis flap procedure at our department between October 23, 2018 and November 22, 2019 were analyzed prospectively. We evaluated postoperative wound healing, complications and recurrence of the disease in a short-term follow-up period. Disease recurrence was defined as prolonged healing or as a new disease requiring repeated surgery. Results: In December 2019 all 27 patients came for a follow-up visit. The result was a fully lateralized wound without any signs of a new disease in all patients. In May 2020 a follow-up visit by phone was performed. The median follow-up was 12 months. The healing process was free of any serious complications in 25 patients. Seroma formation cases were managed by puncture in the outpatient setting. Conclusion: According to the available evidence and guidelines, off-midline procedures – the Karydakis flap, Bascom cleft lift, and Limberg flap procedures – are associated with lower recurrence rates and better wound healing. An important goal is to achieve complete wound lateralization and to change the configuration of the gluteal cleft by reshaping it, which results in a nicely flattened gluteal crease.

scholarly journals Pilonidal Sinus Disease: Risk Factors for Postoperative Complications and Recurrence

2012 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 224-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akin Onder ◽  
Sadullah Girgin ◽  
Murat Kapan ◽  
Mehmet Toker ◽  
Zulfu Arikanoglu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Pilonidal Sinus ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Disease Risk ◽  
Pilonidal Sinus Disease ◽  
Limberg Flap ◽  
Sinus Disease ◽  
Faculty Department ◽  
Closure Method

Abstract The aim of this study is to analyze the risk factors for complications and recurrence in pilonidal sinus disease. The prospective study consisted of 144 patients with pilonidal sinus disease who were operated on at Dicle University Medical Faculty, Department of General Surgery, between February 2008 and December 2010. Patients receiving the Limberg flap totaled 106 (73.6%), while 38 (26.4%) had primary closure. Postoperative complications developed in 42 subjects (29.2%), and recurrence occurred in 19 (13.2%). The Limberg flap method was statistically considered as a risk factor for postoperative complications (P  =  0.039). Regarding recurrence, family tendency (P  =  0.011), sinus number (P  =  0.005), cavity diameter (P  =  0.002), and primary closure (P  =  0.001) were found to be risk factors. Postoperative complication rate is higher in the Limberg flap method than primary closure method. The risk of recurrence is related to family tendency, sinus number, cavity diameter and anesthesia type and is also higher in primary closure.

scholarly journals The limberg flap reconstruction – the optimal surgery for pilonidal sinus disease

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 271-275
Author(s):  
Ramu Shapur Srihari ◽  
Appaji Mandya Naveen ◽  
Harinatha Sreekar
Keyword(s):  
Pilonidal Sinus ◽  
Pilonidal Sinus Disease ◽  
Limberg Flap ◽  
Flap Reconstruction ◽  
Sinus Disease

Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease with Limberg flap repair

2002 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kapan ◽  
S. Kapan ◽  
S. Pekmezci ◽  
V. Durgun
Keyword(s):  
Pilonidal Sinus ◽  
Pilonidal Sinus Disease ◽  
Limberg Flap ◽  
Sinus Disease ◽  
Flap Repair

scholarly journals Management of pilonidal sinus disease with Limberg flap: our experience

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 1575
Author(s):  
Mahavir Singh ◽  
Saish Dalal ◽  
Baleshwar . ◽  
Sethu Raman
Keyword(s):  
Pilonidal Sinus ◽  
Pilonidal Disease ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Pilonidal Sinus Disease ◽  
Common Disease ◽  
Main Concern ◽  
Limberg Flap ◽  
Sinus Disease ◽  
Minimal Scarring ◽  
Early Return

Background: Pilonidal sinus disease is a common disease of young adults. The management of the sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus varies from conservative measures to various surgical procedures. The main concern for the treatment to the patient is the recurrence. Although several methods have been described all have been associated with high recurrence rates. This study was carried out to evaluate the advantages, results of rhomboid excision and limberg flap reconstruction in the management of pilonidal sinus disease.Methods: This prospective study was conducted in General Surgery department of a tertiary care centre of Haryana. It includes 29 patients who were treated for pilonidal sinus disease by Limberg flap surgery from January 2015 to January 2019.  Results: All patients were successfully treated with minimal postoperative discomfort. Only two patients developed seroma which was managed conservatively and in two patients there was slight flap tip necrosis which was also managed conservatively. Rest all other patients wound healed nicely with minimal scarring, with very less postoperative pain, with no recurrence so far.Conclusions:Limberg flap is very effective treatment for pilonidal disease. It has many advantages as it is easy to perform and design, and it flattens the natal cleft with large vascularized pedicle, sutured without tension. This in turn maintains good hygiene, reducing the friction, preventing maceration, and avoiding scar in the midline. The technique is easy to perform in quick time, useful in both primary and recurrent diseases, with very low complication and recurrence rate. Other advantages are quick healing time, short hospital stay, and early return to daily life.  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document