Innominate artery dissection and stroke after rifle recoil

2018 ◽  
Vol 118 (4) ◽  
pp. 557-559
Author(s):  
Isabelle Francillard ◽  
Lou Grangeon ◽  
Aude Triquenot-Bagan ◽  
Ozlem Ozkul-Wermester
2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar M. Sharaf ◽  
Tomas D. Martin ◽  
Eric I. Jeng

Abstract Background Acute DeBakey type I and type II aortic dissections are indications for emergent surgical repair; however, there are currently no standard protocols in the management of isolated supra-aortic dissections. Prompt diagnosis and management of an isolated innominate artery dissection are necessary to prevent distal malperfusion and thromboembolic sequelae. Case presentation A 50-year-old Caucasian gentleman presented with chest pain radiating to his jaw and right arm. He had no recent history of trauma. On physical exam, he was neurologically intact and malignantly hypertensive. Computed tomographic angiography of the chest and neck confirmed a spontaneous isolated innominate artery dissection without ascending aorta involvement. Given the lack of evidence for rupture, distal emboli, and/or end-organ malperfusion, the decision was made for initial non-operative management—anti-impulse regimen, antiplatelet therapy, and close follow-up. Conclusions Medical management of a spontaneous isolated innominate artery dissection is appropriate for short-term and potentially long-term therapy. This not only spares the patient from a potentially unnecessary surgical operation but also provides the surgeon and the patient the time to plan for a surgical approach if it becomes necessary.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. e241710
Author(s):  
Amit Ajit Deshpande ◽  
Sumit Agasty ◽  
Sanjeev Kumar ◽  
Pradeep Ramakrishnan

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (11) ◽  
pp. 710-711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoki Nagata ◽  
Hiroyuki Johno ◽  
Yuncong Wang ◽  
Mai Asanuma

Neurology ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 1315-1315 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Kanady ◽  
R. Hartz ◽  
M. Massad ◽  
O. Melen ◽  
E. Russell ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 815-817 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stelios Lampropoulos ◽  
Efstratios K Theofilogiannakos ◽  
Argiris Gkontopoulos ◽  
Nikos P Kadoglou ◽  
Vassilis Mamalis ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 74 (7) ◽  
pp. 580-586
Author(s):  
Walaya C. Methodius-Ngwodo ◽  
Allison B. Burkett ◽  
Paul V. Kochupura ◽  
Eric D. Wellons ◽  
George Fuhrman ◽  
...  

We have replaced aortography and open thoracic surgery to diagnose and treat blunt traumatic thoracic aortic disruption (TTAD) in favor of CT angiography (CTA) and endovascular repair. The purpose of this study is to review our experience with the management and outcomes of TTAD and associated carotid artery injuries. In January 2003, we initiated a protocol that used CTA to evaluate all patients with suspected TTAD from blunt trauma. When TTAD was diagnosed, patients were managed by endovascular repair using abdominal aortic extension cuffs. Twenty-nine patients with TTAD were managed by endovascular repair. In all patients, abdominal endograft extension cuffs successfully excluded the traumatic disruptions. Six (21%) of these patients had concomitant, unsuspected carotid artery injury diagnosed by CTA. One patient had bilateral carotid artery dissections, sustained irreversible brain injury, and died. Four patients with common carotid dissections were successfully treated by anticoagulation and made uneventful recoveries. One patient with a common carotid–innominate artery dissection and pseudoaneurysm underwent endovascular repair. This study indicates that CTA and endovascular repair provide accurate diagnostic and therapeutic results in the management of blunt TTAD. Furthermore, CTA should include arch and cervical views to detect an unsuspected, concomitant carotid artery injury.


Author(s):  
Gemma María Muñoz-Molina ◽  
Ana Patricia Ovejero-Díaz ◽  
Alberto Cabañero-Sánchez ◽  
Luis Gorospe-Sarasúa ◽  
Inés Pecharromán-De Las Heras ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Antonio Piperata ◽  
Tomaso Bottio ◽  
Martina Avesani ◽  
Gino Gerosa

Bilateral antegrade selective cerebral perfusion has the undisputed advantage of being more physiological and theoretically ensuring complete perfusion of the whole brain. However, it requires longer execution times and manipulation of the epiaortic vessels. On the other hand, unilateral selective cerebral perfusion (u-ASCP) avoids the vessels manipulation, placement of catheters into the ostia of the great vessels which clutters the operative field and incurs both atherosclerotic and air embolism risk. Neverthless, an ongoing debate about which technique yields the best clinical outcomes is still open.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document