scholarly journals Jointly Modelling Economics and Epidemiology to Support Public Policy Decisions for the COVID-19 Response: A Review of UK Studies

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Duarte ◽  
Simon Walker ◽  
Andrew Metry ◽  
Ruth Wong ◽  
Jasmina Panovska-Griffiths ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Inmaculada de Melo-Martín ◽  
Kristen Intemann

This chapter offers a brief overview of the importance of epistemic trust and the relevance that scientific institutions and practices have in promoting or undermining warranted public trust. Epistemic trust is crucial for the production of scientific knowledge, the ability of the public to make sense of scientific phenomena, and the development of public policy. Normatively inappropriate dissent is more likely to take hold and erroneously affect people’s beliefs and actions in a context where the trustworthiness of scientists is called into question and where there is an excessive reliance on scientific information when it comes to assessing policy decisions. Thus, finding ways to facilitate and sustain warranted epistemic trust, as well as increasing understanding of the proper role of science in public policy decisions can help mitigate the negative impact of dissenting views.


2001 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 310-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Ann Schroeder ◽  
Kathleen M. Buckley ◽  
Annette Tyree Debisette

2006 ◽  
Vol 05 (04) ◽  
pp. 739-749 ◽  
Author(s):  
RALPH L. KEENEY

To solve or resolve public policy problems requires decisions. The intent is to choose the best alternative in each situation. Hence, the way the notion of best is defined and measured in each case is critical. A structured process is outlined to acquire knowledge about public values that could be used to evaluate alternatives and identify the best ones. These values are the foundation for any policy decision. The uses of these values for defining interest in the problem, creating alternatives, and identifying information needs are discussed. Research needs are outlined.


2013 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 412-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Moseley ◽  
Harold Kleinert ◽  
Kathleen Sheppard-Jones ◽  
Stephen Hall

Abstract The application of scientific data in the development and implementation of sound public policy is a well-established practice, but there appears to be less consensus on the nature of the strategies that can and should be used to incorporate research data into policy decisions. This paper describes the promise and the challenges of using research evidence to inform public policy. Most specifically, we demonstrate how the application of a large-scale data set, the National Core Indicators (NCI), can be systematically used to drive state-level policy decisions, and we describe a case example of one state's application of NCI data to make significant changes to its Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities waiver. The need for continued research in this area is highlighted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document