scholarly journals Preparation for the United States Medical Licensing Examinations in the Face of COVID-19

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 1267-1272
Author(s):  
Brianna Borsheim ◽  
Chelsea Ledford ◽  
Edan Zitelny ◽  
Caroline Zhao ◽  
John Blizzard ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert F. Kushner ◽  
W. Scott Butsch ◽  
Scott Kahan ◽  
Sriram Machineni ◽  
Stephen Cook ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 568-571 ◽  
Author(s):  
L A Hark ◽  
C Iwamoto ◽  
D E Melnick ◽  
E A Young ◽  
S L Morgan ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 595-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald E. Melnick ◽  
Gerard F. Dillon ◽  
David B. Swanson

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 255-281
Author(s):  
Sylvia Dümmer Scheel

El artículo analiza la diplomacia pública del gobierno de Lázaro Cárdenas centrándose en su opción por publicitar la pobreza nacional en el extranjero, especialmente en Estados Unidos. Se plantea que se trató de una estrategia inédita, que accedió a poner en riesgo el “prestigio nacional” con el fin de justificar ante la opinión pública estadounidense la necesidad de implementar las reformas contenidas en el Plan Sexenal. Aprovechando la inusual empatía hacia los pobres en tiempos del New Deal, se construyó una imagen específica de pobreza que fuera higiénica y redimible. Ésta, sin embargo, no generó consenso entre los mexicanos. This article analyzes the public diplomacy of the government of Lázaro Cárdenas, focusing on the administration’s decision to publicize the nation’s poverty internationally, especially in the United States. This study suggests that this was an unprecedented strategy, putting “national prestige” at risk in order to explain the importance of implementing the reforms contained in the Six Year Plan, in the face of public opinion in the United States. Taking advantage of the increased empathy felt towards the poor during the New Deal, a specific image of hygienic and redeemable poverty was constructed. However, this strategy did not generate agreement among Mexicans.


Author(s):  
William W. Franko ◽  
Christopher Witko

The authors conclude the book by recapping their arguments and empirical results, and discussing the possibilities for the “new economic populism” to promote egalitarian economic outcomes in the face of continuing gridlock and the dominance of Washington, DC’s policymaking institutions by business and the wealthy, and a conservative Republican Party. Many states are actually addressing inequality now, and these policies are working. Admittedly, many states also continue to embrace the policies that have contributed to growing inequality, such as tax cuts for the wealthy or attempting to weaken labor unions. But as the public grows more concerned about inequality, the authors argue, policies that help to address these income disparities will become more popular, and policies that exacerbate inequality will become less so. Over time, if history is a guide, more egalitarian policies will spread across the states, and ultimately to the federal government.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document