What are patients saying about you online? A sentiment analysis of online written reviews on Scoliosis Research Society surgeons

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin E. Tang ◽  
Varun Arvind ◽  
Christopher A. White ◽  
Calista Dominy ◽  
Jun S. Kim ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Kadir Gem ◽  
Sertan Hancioglu ◽  
Abdulkadir Bilgiç ◽  
Serkan Erkan

Abstract Introduction The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the correction rate in Cobb angle and the improvement in quality of life profile in terms of Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 values. Patients and Methods Between January 2007 and December 2013, posterior instrumentation and fusion was performed to 30 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Patients were grouped according to their improvement rate in Cobb angles after surgery. Patients with an improvement rate of > 80% were grouped as Group A; those with an improvement rate of > 60% and ≤ 80% as Group B and those with an improvement rate of ≤ 60% were grouped as Group C. The SRS-22 questionnaire of these three groups was calculated and their relationship with the improvement in Cobb angle was evaluated. Results No statistical difference was found among the three groups in terms of pain, appearance, function, spirit, satisfaction, and SRS-22 values (all p > 0.05). Conclusion The results of this study demonstrate that the degree of correction rate does not correlate with the degree of improvement in the SRS-22 questionnaire in patients with AIS that underwent posterior fusion and instrumentation.


Scoliosis ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hubert Labelle ◽  
Stephens B Richards ◽  
Marinus De Kleuver ◽  
Theodoros B Grivas ◽  
Keith D K Luk ◽  
...  

Spine ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (20) ◽  
pp. 2288
Author(s):  
Charles T. Mehlman ◽  
Suken A. Shah ◽  
Matthew B. Dobbs ◽  
Donald P. K. Chan

Neurosurgery ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 63 (suppl_3) ◽  
pp. A16-A24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin S. Smith ◽  
Christopher I. Shaffrey ◽  
Charles Kuntz ◽  
Praveen V. Mummaneni

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To review current classification systems for adolescent and adult scoliosis. METHODS The literature was reviewed in reference to scoliosis classification systems for adolescent and adult scoliosis. RESULTS There are multiple classification systems for scoliosis. Classification of scoliosis is dependent on patient age, spinal abnormality, scoliotic curve, and global spinal alignment. To date, classification systems have focused predominantly on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis or adult/degenerative scoliosis; a single classification system evaluating scoliotic deformities of different ages and spinal abnormalities has not been identified. CONCLUSION The importance of scoliosis classification schemes lies in their ability to standardize communication among health care providers. With regard to the classification of adolescent scoliosis, the Lenke system has addressed many of the significant limitations of the King system and is now the standard classification scheme. Classification schemes for adult scoliosis have been reported only recently, and each offers specific advantages (the simple pathogenesis-based system of Aebi, the strong clinical relevance of the Schwab system, and the richly descriptive Scoliosis Research Society system). This article highlights the salient features of currently used scoliosis classification systems.


2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 452-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Brewer ◽  
Fiona Berryman ◽  
De Baker ◽  
Paul Pynsent ◽  
Adrian Gardner

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document