Evaluation of different treatment strategies between right-sided and left-sided pneumonectomy for stage I-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer patients

Background This study aimed to assess the different survival outcome of stage I-IIIA NSCLC patients who received right-sided and left-sided pneumonectomy, and to further develop the most appropriate treatment strategies. Methods We accessed data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database in the United States for the present study. An innovative propensity score matching analysis was used to minimize the variance between groups. Results For 2,683 patients who received pneumonectomy, cancer-specific survival (HR=0.863, 95%CI: 0.771 to 0.965, P=0.010) and overall survival (OS) (HR=0.875, 95%CI: 0.793 to 0.967, P=0.008) were significantly superior of left-sided pneumonectomy compared with right-sided pneumonectomy. Cancer-specific survival (HR=0.847, 95%CI: 0.745 to 0.963, P=0.011) and OS (HR=0.858, 95%CI: 0.768 to 0.959, P=0.007) were also significantly longer with left-sided over opposite-sided pneumonectomy after matching analysis for 2,050 patients. Adjuvant therapy could significantly prolong cancer-specific survival (67 versus 51 months, HR=1.314, 95%CI: 1.093 to 1.579, P=0.004) and OS (46 versus 30 months, HR=1.458, 95%CI: 1.239 to 1.715, P<0.001) among left-sided pneumonectomy patients after matching procedure. While adjuvant therapy did not increase cancer-specific survival for right-sided pneumonectomy patients (46 versus 42 months, HR=1.112, 95%CI: 0.933 to 1.325, P=0.236). Subgroup analysis showed that adjuvant chemotherapy could significantly improve cancer-specific survival and OS for all pneumonectomy patients. But radiotherapy was associated with worse survival for patients with right-sided pneumonectomy. Conclusions Pneumonectomy side could be deemed as an important factor when physicians choosing the most optimal treatment strategies. The abstract was presented at the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting (Abstract #8524)

Randomized phase II trial of radium-223 (RA) plus enzalutamide (EZ) versus EZ alone in metastatic castration-refractory prostate cancer (mCRPC): Long-term follow up of secondary endpoints.

125 Background: RA, a bone targeting alpha radiopharmaceutical, and EZ, are approved for mCRPC. Per phase 3 SWOG0421 trial, men with mCRPC and a significant decline in serum bone metabolism markers (BMM) had improved survival with atrasentan, a bone targeting agent (PMID 24565955). We hypothesized that RA+EZ is safe, and decrease bone metabolism markers compared to EZ alone. Here we report the long-term follow up of the secondary clinical endpoints. Methods: In this phase 2 trial (NCT02199197), men with progressive mCRPC were treated with EZ (160 mg daily) ± RA (standard dose of 55 kBq/kg IV Q4 weeks x 6), until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. Primary objectives: 1) changes in N-telopeptide compared from baseline to end of treatment; 2) safety. Secondary objectives: changes in 4 other markers of bone resorption or formation, and PSA progression free survival (PSA-PFS), radiographic PFS (rPFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: After a safety lead in phase (n=8), 39 men were randomized (2:1) to RA+EZ vs EZ. Median follow up is 19.3 months (range 3 – 24 months). Combining RA+EZ was safe (2018 ASCO annual meeting abstract: 5057) and met the primary endpoint (2018 ESMO annual meeting: Annals of Oncology). There was a consistent trend regarding PSA-PFS, rPFS and OS favoring RA+EZ over EZ. . . (Table). Notably, no bone fractures have occurred in either group with extended follow up. Conclusions: The use of RA+EZ was safe with a longer follow up with no increase in skeletal related events including fractures. All secondary endpoints, numerically favored RA+EZ vs EZ. Clinical trial information: NCT02614859.