Determination of gaseous hydrogen peroxide at parts per trillion levels a Nafion membrane scrubber and a single-line flow-injection system

1992 ◽  
Vol 260 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Genfa Zhang ◽  
Purnendu K. Dasgupta ◽  
Andreas Sigg
2003 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 1647-1651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobutoshi KIBA ◽  
Seiji ITO ◽  
Masaki TACHIBANA ◽  
Kazue TANI ◽  
Hitoshi KOIZUMI

1994 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 231-235
Author(s):  
Noriko OHNO ◽  
Hiroatsu SAKAI ◽  
Hiroshi OHTA ◽  
Tadao SAKAI

2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 446-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saowapak Teerasong ◽  
Thitaporn Sonsa-Ard ◽  
Chavin Vimolkanjana ◽  
Nathawut Choengchan ◽  
Apiwat Chompoosor ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Andrei E Danet ◽  
Mihaela Oancea ◽  
Silviu Jipa ◽  
Tanta Setnescu

A highly sensitive flow injection system was developed for the methanol determination. The system is based on the oxidation of methanol in the presence of alcohol oxidase to yield formaldehyde and hydrogen peroxide. The concentration of the hydrogen peroxide produced was determined by luminol chemiluminescence. A four-line flow injection assembly was used. The sample was injected into a flow of phosphate buffer at pH 9 that merged with a flow containing alcohol oxidase. The enzymatic reaction takes place in a coiled tube, 2 meters · long and 0.8 mm i.d. Just in front of the chemiluminescence cell, the flow containing the sample merged with a flow of luminol (1.5 mM) and potassium ferricyanide (20 mM). The injected volume was 50 pL and the total flow rate 1.6 mL min·1 The determination range was 5x10"4 -1x10'2 %(v/v) methanol. The throughput was 40 samples per hour. From 20 tested substances, only L-cysteine generated a signal comparable with that of methanol. The others, at concentrations equal to those of methanol, either gave no signal at all (n-butanol, cyclo-hexanol, glycine, L-threonine, L-proline, copper sulphate) or gave signals much smaller than that of methanol.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document