Activity of neurons in cortical area 3a during maintenance of steady postures by the monkey

1975 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 549-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Tanji
Keyword(s):  
Cortical Area ◽  
Area 3A

Plasticity of Primary Somatosensory Cortex Paralleling Sensorimotor Skill Recovery From Stroke in Adult Monkeys

1998 ◽  
Vol 79 (4) ◽  
pp. 2119-2148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Xerri ◽  
Michael M. Merzenich ◽  
Bret E. Peterson ◽  
William Jenkins
Keyword(s):  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Skill Acquisition ◽  
Cortical Area ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Field Size ◽  
Primary Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Small Object ◽  
Object Retrieval ◽  
Area 3A ◽  
Area 3B

Xerri, Christian, Michael M. Merzenich, Bret E. Peterson, and William Jenkins. Plasticity of primary somatosensory cortex paralleling sensorimotor skill recovery from stroke in adult monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 79: 2119–2148, 1998. Adult owl and squirrel monkeys were trained to master a small-object retrieval sensorimotor skill. Behavioral observations along with positive changes in the cortical area 3b representations of specific skin surfaces implicated specific glabrous finger inputs as important contributors to skill acquisition. The area 3b zones over which behaviorally important surfaces were represented were destroyed by microlesions, which resulted in a degradation of movements that had been developed in the earlier skill acquisition. Monkeys were then retrained at the same behavioral task. They could initially perform it reasonably well using the stereotyped movements that they had learned in prelesion training, although they acted as if key finger surfaces were insensate. However, monkeys soon initiated alternative strategies for small object retrieval that resulted in a performance drop. Over several- to many-week-long period, monkeys again used the fingers for object retrieval that had been used successfully before the lesion, and reacquired the sensorimotor skill. Detailed maps of the representations of the hands in SI somatosensory cortical fields 3b, 3a, and 1 were derived after postlesion functional recovery. Control maps were derived in the same hemispheres before lesions, and in opposite hemispheres. Among other findings, these studies revealed the following 1) there was a postlesion reemergence of the representation of the fingertips engaged in the behavior in novel locations in area 3b in two of five monkeys and a less substantial change in the representation of the hand in the intact parts of area 3b in three of five monkeys. 2) There was a striking emergence of a new representation of the cutaneous fingertips in area 3a in four of five monkeys, predominantly within zones that had formerly been excited only by proprioceptive inputs. This new cutaneous fingertip representation disproportionately represented behaviorally crucial fingertips. 3) There was an approximately two times enlargement of the representation of the fingers recorded in cortical area 1 in postlesion monkeys. The specific finger surfaces employed in small-object retrieval were differentially enlarged in representation. 4) Multiple-digit receptive fields were recorded at a majority of emergent, cutaneous area 3a sites in all monkeys and at a substantial number of area 1 sites in three of five postlesion monkeys. Such fields were uncommon in area 1 in control maps. 5) Single receptive fields and the component fields of multiple-digit fields in postlesion representations were within normal receptive field size ranges. 6) No significant changes were recorded in the SI hand representations in the opposite (untrained, intact) control hemisphere. These findings are consistent with “substitution” and “vicariation” (adaptive plasticity) models of recovery from brain damage and stroke.

Frequency discrimination training engaging a restricted skin surface results in an emergence of a cutaneous response zone in cortical area 3a

1992 ◽  
Vol 67 (5) ◽  
pp. 1057-1070 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. H. Recanzone ◽  
M. M. Merzenich ◽  
W. M. Jenkins
Keyword(s):  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Cortical Area ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Frequency Discrimination ◽  
Skin Surface ◽  
Opposite Hemisphere ◽  
Functional Roles ◽  
Area 3A ◽  
Cutaneous Response ◽  
Cortical Representations

1. The responses of cortical neurons evoked by cutaneous stimulation were investigated in the hand representation of cortical area 3a in adult owl monkeys that had been trained in a tactile frequency discrimination task. Cortical representations of the hands in these experimental hemispheres were compared with those representing the opposite, untrained hand, as well as with those representing a passively stimulated hand in a second class of control monkeys. 2. A large cutaneous representation of the hairy and glabrous skin surfaces of the hand emerged in area 3a in each trained hemisphere. 3. With the emergence of cutaneous responses recorded for neurons at many area 3a locations, the normally recorded deep receptor inputs were no longer evident at most of these locations. 4. There was a greater territory of representation of the small area of skin that was stimulated in the behavioral task in trained monkeys, when compared with the representations of corresponding skin sites in the opposite hemisphere of the same monkeys, or to the representations of equivalent skin sites stimulated in passively stimulated control monkeys. 5. There was great variability in the receptive-field properties of neurons responsive to cutaneous inputs among trained monkeys. In most recording sites within the representations of the behaviorally engaged hands, the cutaneous receptive fields were large, extending over a significant part of the glabrous or hairy surfaces of the hand. However, in one monkey, very small, topographically ordered cutaneous receptive fields were recorded over a wide zone of area 3a. 6. The physiologically defined borders between areas 3a and 3b were in register with the cytoarchitectonically defined borders between these two cortical areas in trained and in control monkeys. 7. This study demonstrates that there is a reorganization of the cutaneous and "deep" representation of hand in cortical area 3a, with the main change being an emergence of a large cutaneous representation and the parallel disappearance of a large part of the normal deep representation in this field. These changes are discussed in light of the possible functional roles of cortical area 3a.

A data-driven procedure to characterize the electrophysiology of any cortical area using TMS/hd-EEG

NeuroImage ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. S80
Author(s):  
S Casarotto ◽  
AG Casali ◽  
M Rosanova ◽  
M Mariotti ◽  
M Massimini
Keyword(s):  
Cortical Area ◽  
Data Driven

Serial and parallel processing of tactual information in somatosensory cortex of rhesus monkeys

1992 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 518-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. P. Pons ◽  
P. E. Garraghty ◽  
M. Mishkin
Keyword(s):  
Substantial Reduction ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Somatosensory System ◽  
Encounter Rate ◽  
Specific Information ◽  
Tactile Information ◽  
Cortical Areas ◽  
Area 3A ◽  
Area 3B ◽  
Made In

1. Selective ablations of the hand representations in postcentral cortical areas 3a, 3b, 1, and 2 were made in different combinations to determine each area's contribution to the responsivity and modality properties of neurons in the hand representation in SII. 2. Ablations that left intact only the postcentral areas that process predominantly cutaneous inputs (i.e., areas 3b and 1) yielded SII recording sites responsive to cutaneous stimulation and none driven exclusively by high-intensity or "deep" stimulation. Conversely, ablations that left intact only the postcentral areas that process predominantly deep receptor inputs (i.e., areas 3a and 2) yielded mostly SII recording sites that responded exclusively to deep stimulation. 3. Ablations that left intact only area 3a or only area 2 yielded substantial and roughly equal reductions in the number of deep receptive fields in SII. By contrast, ablations that left intact only area 3b or only area 1 yielded unequal reductions in the number of cutaneous receptive fields in SII: a small reduction when area 3b alone was intact but a somewhat larger one when only area 1 was intact. 4. Finally, when the hand representation in area 3b was ablated, leaving areas 3a, 1, and 2 fully intact, there was again a substantial reduction in the encounter rate of cutaneous receptive fields. 5. The partial ablations often led to unresponsive sites in the SII hand representation. In SII representations other than of the hand no such unresponsive sites were found and there were no substantial changes in the ratio of cutaneous to deep receptive fields, indicating that the foregoing results were not due to long-lasting postsurgical depression or effects of anesthesia. 6. The findings indicate that modality-specific information is relayed from postcentral cortical areas to SII along parallel channels, with cutaneous inputs transmitted via areas 3b and 1, and deep inputs via areas 3a and 2. Further, area 3b provides the major source of cutaneous input to SII, directly and perhaps also via area 1. 7. The results are in line with accumulating anatomic and electrophysiologic evidence pointing to an evolutionary shift in the organization of the somatosensory system from the general mammalian plan, in which tactile information is processed in parallel in SI and SII, to a new organization in higher primates in which the processing of tactile information proceeds serially from SI to SII. The presumed functional advantages of this evolutionary shift are unknown.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document