Temporal interference effects by a pair of two-frequency laser beams — application to extremely low velocity measurements

1977 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshihiro Ohtsuka ◽  
Issei Sasaki
1999 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 2144-2149 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. B. Wharton ◽  
R. K. Kirkwood ◽  
S. H. Glenzer ◽  
K. G. Estabrook ◽  
B. B. Afeyan ◽  
...  

Geophysics ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 955-960 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. A. Kaarsberg

The phase delay of a continuous sinusoidal elastic wave after transmission through a medium may be used to determine the velocity of propagation of the wave in the medium. The change in path length for a given frequency, or the change in frequency for a given path length, required to change the phase delay by integral multiples of 360 degrees is measured in the laboratory by the use of source and receiver piezoelectric transducers whose signals are applied to the horizontal and vertical deflection circuits of an oscilloscope. The accuracy of the method depends upon the accuracy with which the frequency of the transmitted wave and its path length through the medium (or change in path length) can be determined, provided the effect of extraneous signals (e.g., boundary reflections, multiple reflections, alternate modes of propagation, etc.) is negligible. The phase‐delay methods are illustrated and compared with conventional pulse methods by using both to make compressional‐velocity measurements in water and compressional‐ and shear‐velocity measurements in a high velocity basalt and in a low velocity dried mud sample. The results of the two methods agree to within a few percent. It is suggested that these phase‐delay methods may be especially well‐suited for making elastic‐wave velocity measurements in media with high attenuation of the waves propagated in them.


1998 ◽  
Vol 81 (11) ◽  
pp. 2248-2251 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. B. Wharton ◽  
R. K. Kirkwood ◽  
S. H. Glenzer ◽  
K. G. Estabrook ◽  
B. B. Afeyan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
John J. Charonko ◽  
Pavlos P. Vlachos

The accurate measurement of velocity fields containing large dynamic ranges is important because many problems of interest feature regions of both very high and low velocity. Examples include mixing tanks, jets injected into quiescent chambers, and stagnation regions behind bodies in high speed flow. However, accurate calculation of the velocity is currently limited to displacements greater than the total error of the scheme used (typically in the range of 0.01 to 0.05 pixels) and less than one-quarter of the window size. To counteract this difficulty, two new methods for improving the dynamic range of DPIV calculations have been developed. The first can be used with any double-pulsed time-resolved DPIV system where closely spaced frame pairs are captured at kilohertz rates. Displacement measurements can be made both within each frame pair (resolving high velocity regions), and between successive pairs (resolving low velocity regions). The two displacement fields are then reconciled, resulting in a single flow field measurement. The second method uses multiple laser pulses per camera exposure. Four laser pulses are required per measurement (two per camera frame), however, unlike the first method, kilohertz repetitions rates are not required. By carefully selecting the intervals between pulses, it is possible to associate the each cross-correlation peak with the correct delay time, and thereby simultaneously obtain velocity measurements over a much wider dynamic range. These two methods have been applied to synthetic and experimental data and their performance has been characterized through error analysis. Results indicate that both methods can increase the dynamic range by one to two orders of magnitude as compared to traditional techniques, while retaining similar total error and spatial resolution characteristics.


Author(s):  
F. Xu ◽  
N. C. Siersch ◽  
S. Gréaux ◽  
A. Rivoldini ◽  
H. Kuwahara ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonardo de Souza Menezes ◽  
Marcio A. Alencar ◽  
Cid B. de Araujo

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariusz Pożoga ◽  
Marcin Grzesiak ◽  
Barbara Matyjasiak ◽  
Hanna Rothkaehl ◽  
Roman Wronowski ◽  
...  

<pre>LOFAR single station observation mode is often used for ionospheric studies. Observations of A-Team (the brightest radio sources CasA, CygA, TauA) enables measure of ionospheric scintillation. Relatively low brightness of the radio sources compared to signals coming from the Earth and originating from man-made activity (in particular RFI) can make the analysis difficult. In order to fully utilize the data, it is necessary to apply methods that eliminate interference. Combination of broadband observations and careful selection of observation frequencies should also improve the results. Another problem is the frequency (very low compared to GPS) which requires very careful data analysis. We observe large structures in relatively quiet conditions and low velocity of ionospheric drift resulting in low frequency scintillations compared to GPS. Amplitude observations conducted as a standard observations suggest using the S4 index to monitor the state of the ionosphere. In this paper, we present methods for calculating the S4 index for LOFAR data that eliminates the obstacles mentioned above. We compare different methods that resolve the problem and present the results. Signal spectra were also examined in detail to explore the possibility of using them to eliminate interference effects. The analyzes were carried out on the basis of data collected during the last 3 years at the PL610 station in Borowiec.</pre>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document