Temporal summation in foveal vision

1970 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1477-1481 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Tittarelli ◽  
F.H.C. Marriott

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Z. Yildiz ◽  
Murat Ozsaltik ◽  
Burak Guclu
Keyword(s):  


2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary B. Rollman ◽  
Sari Hershenfield ◽  
Kobina Quansah


1963 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. N. Wright ◽  
Jozef J. Zwislocki


2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 126
Author(s):  
Joon Ho Lee ◽  
Jae Hwa Yoo ◽  
Sung Hwan Cho ◽  
Yong Ik Kim


1957 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 435-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
David P. C. Lloyd

An assemblage of individual motoneurons constituting a synthetic motoneuron pool has been studied from the standpoint of relating monosynaptic reflex responses to frequency of afferent stimulation. Intensity of low frequency depression is not a simple function of transmitter potentiality. As frequency of stimulation increases from 3 per minute to 10 per second, low frequency depression increases in magnitude. Between 10 and approximately 60 per second low frequency depression apparently diminishes and subnormality becomes a factor in causing depression. At frequencies above 60 per second temporal summation occurs, but subnormality limits the degree of response attainable by summation. At low stimulation frequencies rhythm is determined by stimulation frequency. Interruptions of rhythmic firing depend solely upon temporal fluctuation of excitability. At high frequency of stimulation rhythm is determined by subnormality rather than inherent rhythmicity, and excitability fluctuation leads to instability of response rhythm. In short, whatever the stimulation frequency, random excitability fluctuation is the factor disrupting rhythmic response. Monosynaptic reflex response latency is stable during high frequency stimulation as it is in low frequency stimulation provided a significant extrinsic source of random bombardment is not present. In the presence of powerful random bombardment discharge may become random with respect to monosynaptic afferent excitation provided the latter is feeble. When this occurs it does so equally at low frequency and high frequency. Thus temporal summation is not a necessary factor. There is, then, no remaining evidence to suggest that the agency for temporal summation in the monosynaptic system becomes a transmitting agency in its own right.



2021 ◽  
Vol 141 ◽  
pp. 145-159
Author(s):  
Ryan Burt ◽  
Nina N. Thigpen ◽  
Andreas Keil ◽  
Jose C. Principe


Author(s):  
Christian Wolf ◽  
Markus Lappe

AbstractHumans and other primates are equipped with a foveated visual system. As a consequence, we reorient our fovea to objects and targets in the visual field that are conspicuous or that we consider relevant or worth looking at. These reorientations are achieved by means of saccadic eye movements. Where we saccade to depends on various low-level factors such as a targets’ luminance but also crucially on high-level factors like the expected reward or a targets’ relevance for perception and subsequent behavior. Here, we review recent findings how the control of saccadic eye movements is influenced by higher-level cognitive processes. We first describe the pathways by which cognitive contributions can influence the neural oculomotor circuit. Second, we summarize what saccade parameters reveal about cognitive mechanisms, particularly saccade latencies, saccade kinematics and changes in saccade gain. Finally, we review findings on what renders a saccade target valuable, as reflected in oculomotor behavior. We emphasize that foveal vision of the target after the saccade can constitute an internal reward for the visual system and that this is reflected in oculomotor dynamics that serve to quickly and accurately provide detailed foveal vision of relevant targets in the visual field.



2011 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
pp. e79
Author(s):  
Masashi Tabuchi ◽  
Takeshi Sakurai ◽  
Hidefumi Mitsuno ◽  
Shigehiro Namiki ◽  
Ryo Minegishi ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document