Naloxone attenuates voluntary ethanol intake in rats selectively bred for high ethanol preference

1990 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 385-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.C. Froehlich ◽  
J. Harts ◽  
L. Lumeng ◽  
T.-K. Li
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (45) ◽  
pp. 4799-4805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osvaldo Flores-Bastías ◽  
Gonzalo I. Gómez ◽  
Juan A. Orellana ◽  
Eduardo Karahanian

Background: High ethanol intake induces a neuroinflammatory response resulting in the subsequent maintenance of chronic alcohol consumption. The melanocortin system plays a pivotal role in the modulation of alcohol consumption. Interestingly, it has been shown that the activation of melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) in the brain decreases the neuroinflammatory response in models of brain damage other than alcohol consumption, such as LPS-induced neuroinflammation, cerebral ischemia, glutamate excitotoxicity, and spinal cord injury. Objectives: In this work, we aimed to study whether MC4R activation by a synthetic MC4R-agonist peptide prevents ethanol-induced neuroinflammation, and if alcohol consumption produces changes in MC4R expression in the hippocampus and hypothalamus. Methods: Ethanol-preferring Sprague Dawley rats were selected offering access to 20% ethanol on alternate days for 4 weeks (intermittent access protocol). After this time, animals were i.p. administered an MC4R agonist peptide in the last 2 days of the protocol. Then, the expression of the proinflammatory cytokines interleukin 6 (IL-6), interleukin 1-beta (IL-1β), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) were measured in the hippocampus, hypothalamus and prefrontal cortex. It was also evaluated if ethanol intake produces alterations in the expression of MC4R in the hippocampus and the hypothalamus. Results: Alcohol consumption increased the expression of MC4R in the hippocampus and the hypothalamus. The administration of the MC4R agonist reduced IL-6, IL-1β and TNF-α levels in hippocampus, hypothalamus and prefrontal cortex, to those observed in control rats that did not drink alcohol. Conclusion: High ethanol consumption produces an increase in the expression of MC4R in the hippocampus and hypothalamus. The administration of a synthetic MC4R-agonist peptide prevents neuroinflammation induced by alcohol consumption in the hippocampus, hypothalamus, and prefrontal cortex. These results could explain the effect of α-MSH and other synthetic MC4R agonists in decreasing alcohol intake through the reduction of the ethanol-induced inflammatory response in the brain.


2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 739-745 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weichuan Wu ◽  
Runfa Tian ◽  
Shuyu Hao ◽  
Feifan Xu ◽  
Xiang Mao ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 223 (11) ◽  
pp. jeb224121
Author(s):  
Scarlet J. Park ◽  
William W. Ja

2020 ◽  
Vol 212 ◽  
pp. 108025
Author(s):  
Fabio Bellia ◽  
Macarena Soledad Fernández ◽  
María Carolina Fabio ◽  
Mariangela Pucci ◽  
Ricardo Marcos Pautassi ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 28 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 19A
Author(s):  
D A. Finn ◽  
N Yoneyama ◽  
A R. Wetzel ◽  
J C. Crabbe

QJM ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 93 (7) ◽  
pp. 449-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.M. Nicolas
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 424-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Belén Acevedo ◽  
Juan Carlos Molina ◽  
Michael E. Nizhnikov ◽  
Norman E. Spear ◽  
Ricardo Marcos Pautassi

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 625-634
Author(s):  
Ali Chalak ◽  
Lilian Ghandour ◽  
Sirine Anouti ◽  
Rima Nakkash ◽  
Nasser Yassin ◽  
...  

Abstract This study aims to model youth’s off-premise alcohol demand and forecasts ethanol intake responsiveness to alcohol taxes. Using stated preference alcohol purchase data from a survey of 1024 university students in Lebanon, we derive price elasticities that we use to forecast the effects of two excise tax scenarios on overall ethanol intake. The first scenario imposes a broad-based 20% tax on all types of alcoholic beverages, and the second scenario imposes a targeted 20% tax only on the high ethanol content, while exempting the lower ethanol beverages. Overall, targeted taxes are found to achieve a reduction in ethanol intake that is nearly three times that achieved by broad taxes (15.7% vs 5.3%). For ‘past-month binge drinkers’, targeted taxes would decrease alcohol intake by 16.3%, while broad taxes increase it by 3.3%. Finally, ethanol intake among participants who prefer low ethanol content would decrease under targeted taxes by more than five times as much as under broad taxes. For ‘high-ethanol drinkers’, targeted taxes decrease alcohol intake by an even larger proportion than for ‘low-ethanol drinkers’ (19.0% vs 15.6%), while broad taxes increase their ethanol intake by ∼16.0%. This study contributes evidence that taxation policy substantially reduces alcohol consumption and that alcohol consumption patterns should be accounted for when designing taxes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document