A structural determinant of hemispheric processing of pictorial material

1978 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy E. Veroff
2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 147470491983972 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunna Hou ◽  
Zhijun Liu

Researchers have found that compared with other existing conditions (e.g., pleasantness), information relevant to survival produced a higher rate of retrieval; this effect is known as the survival processing advantage (SPA). Previous experiments have examined that the advantage of memory can be extended to some different types of visual pictorial material, such as pictures and short video clips, but there were some arguments for whether face stimulus could be seen as a boundary condition of SPA. The current work explores whether there is a mnemonic advantage to different trustworthiness of face for human adaptation. In two experiments, we manipulated the facial trustworthiness (untrustworthy, neutral, and trustworthy), which is believed to provide information regarding survival decisions. Participants were asked to predict their avoidance or approach response tendency, when encountering strangers (represented by three classified faces of trustworthiness) in a survival scenario and the control scenario. The final surprise memory tests revealed that it was better to recognize both the trustworthy faces and untrustworthy faces, when the task was related to survival. Experiment 1 demonstrated the existence of a SPA in the bipolarity of facial untrustworthiness and trustworthiness. In Experiment 2, we replicated the SPA of trustworthy and untrustworthy face recognitions using a matched design, where we found this kind of memory benefits only in recognition tasks but not in source memory tasks. These results extend the generality of SPAs to face domain.


2003 ◽  
Vol 308 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuhei Ishikura ◽  
Noriyuki Usami ◽  
Ossama El-Kabbani ◽  
Akira Hara

2010 ◽  
Vol 135 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Ramponi ◽  
Fionnuala C. Murphy ◽  
Andrew J. Calder ◽  
Philip J. Barnard

1993 ◽  
Vol 76 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1147-1152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee W. Ellis ◽  
Joan N. Kaderavek ◽  
Michael P. Rastatter

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness and validity of magnitude-estimation scaling as an alternative to a traditional, somewhat more cumbersome reaction-time procedure in the assessment of hemispheric processing asymmetry. Lexical decision vocal reaction times and magnitude-estimation scaling values were obtained for 16 normal subjects to tachistoscopically presented concrete and abstract words. Analysis of variance showed identical interactions of field x stimuli for each dependent variable while all pair-wise correlations between these measures were significant. Magnitude-estimation scaling may be a sensitive measure of visual psychophysical differences in hemispheric processing and may circumvent problems with variance of latencies associated with disordered populations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document