Flash visual evoked potentials (VEP) and electroretinograms (ERG) in the evaluation of optic nerve damage due to midface and skullbase trauma

1995 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 263
Medicina ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 49 (11) ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
Daina Pastare ◽  
Ieva Қire ◽  
Renārs Erts ◽  
Guna Laganovska ◽  

Background and Objective: Axional tissue impairment playes a substantial role in the development of disability in multiple sclerosis.[...]


Neurosurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (CN_suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 239-239
Author(s):  
Fahad A Alkherayf ◽  
David Houlden ◽  
Chantal Turgeon ◽  
Charles B Agbi ◽  
Andre Lamothe ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTION Optic nerve/chiasmal injury is a devastating outcome that may happen during endoscopic surgery. A key goal of endoscopic skull-base surgery is visual improvement. Currently, however, there is limited intraoperative visual pathway monitoring. We examine a novel technique that uses continuous flash visual evoked potentials (FVEPs). METHODS Eyes were stimulated by light stimulators (3 LEDs on each side, 640 nm peak wavelength, 10 ms pulse width, 3000 mCd of luminous intensity). Uniform illumination was placed over eyelids. Recording electrodes were placed at Oz-Fz. The filter cuts were = 5 Hz and 100 Hz with amplifier gain 20,000 or 50,000. EEG was recorded. Recordings were correlated to pre and post operative VFs and acuity. Dropping in the FVEP was examined in relation to intraoperative events. A drop of 50% from the base line was considered positive. RESULTS >101 patients had FVEPs in addition to other neurophysiologic monitoring. Patients demographic data, co-morbidities, diagnosis, surgical approach, length of surgery, MAP, and blood loss during surgery were recorded. All patients' visual acuity and field deficits were evaluated by neuro-ophthalmologist before their surgery and within 30 days after surgery. In our cohort, one patient had true positive pre-chiasmatic while another patient had false negative test result. However, the latter patient's deficit was post chiasmatic with no optic nerve or chiasmal injury. Another patient had false positive test (drop of 60%). Eight patients had transient changes related to traction of the chiasm or optic nerves. For predicting optic nerve or chiasmal injury, our study showed sensitivity of 100% (CI2.5-100), specificity of 99% (CI94.5-99.97) and negative predicted value of 100%. CONCLUSION FVEP is reproducible throughout surgery and can predict the post surgical outcome. Additionally, we found that FVEP is transiently affected by different stages of surgery. Further validation is required given the small number of optic/chiasmal injuries in our study.


2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Schumann ◽  
Horst Kokemüller ◽  
Frank Tavassol ◽  
Daniel Lindhorst ◽  
Juliana Lemound ◽  
...  

Orbital and anterior skull base surgery is generally performed close to the prechiasmatic visual pathway, and clear strategies for detecting and handling visual pathway damage are essential. To overcome the common problem of a missed clinical examination because of an uncooperative or unresponsive patient, flash visual evoked potentials and electroretinograms should be used. These electrophysiologic examination techniques can provide evidence of intact, pathologic, or absent conductivity of the visual pathway when clinical assessment is not feasible. Visual evoked potentials and electroretinograms are thus essential diagnostic procedures not only for primary diagnosis but also for intraoperative evaluation. A decision for or against treatment of a visual pathway injury has to be made as fast as possible due to the enormous importance of the time elapsed with such injuries; this can be achieved additionally using multislice spiral computed tomography. The first-line conservative treatment of choice for such injuries is megadose methylprednisolone therapy. Surgery is used to decompress the orbital compartment by exposure of the intracanalicular part of the optic nerve in the case of optic canal compression. Modern craniomaxillofacial surgery requires detailed consideration of the diagnosis and treatment of traumatic visual pathway damage with the ultimate goal of preserving visual acuity.


2005 ◽  
Vol 67 (9) ◽  
pp. 869-875 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomofumi KIMOTSUKI ◽  
Mitsuya YASUDA ◽  
Satoshi TAMAHARA ◽  
Naoaki MATSUKI ◽  
Kenichiro ONO

Author(s):  
Mariana Isa Poci Palumbo ◽  
Luiz Antonio de Lima Resende ◽  
Giovane Olivo ◽  
José Paes de Oliveira-Filho ◽  
Alexandre Secorun Borges

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document