Anatomical Relations in the Carpal Tunnel: A Computed Tomographic Study

1987 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
W. JESSURUN ◽  
B. HILLEN ◽  
F. ZONNEVELD ◽  
A. J. C. HUFFSTADT ◽  
J. W. F. BEKS ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Median Nerve ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Cross Sectional Area ◽  
Neutral Position ◽  
Sectional Area ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Computed Tomographic ◽  
Flexor Retinaculum ◽  
The Cross

Computed tomography of the carpal tunnel was performed in the hands of both patients and controls in a neutral position, in flexion and in extension. The median nerve was not compressed between the long flexors and the flexor retinaculum in either flexion or extension of the wrist. In flexion, the nerve usually moved dorsally, away from the flexor retinaculum. No difference could be found between the cross-sectional area of the carpal tunnel between patients and controls.

The Usefulness of Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 435-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. PINILLA ◽  
C. MARTÍN-HERVÁS ◽  
G. SORDO ◽  
S. SANTIAGO
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Median Nerve ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Cross Sectional Area ◽  
Sectional Area ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Electrophysiological Findings ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
The Cross ◽  
Diagnostic Criterion

This study assessed the use of ultrasound in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome and to determine the best ultrasound criterion for diagnosis. Forty wrists of 27 patients with surgically proven moderate and severe carpal tunnel syndrome and 30 wrists of 15 controls were examined. Measurements of the cross-sectional area and the anteroposterior diameter of the median nerve at the inlet and outlet of the carpal tunnel were obtained. Patients also underwent electrophysiological evaluation. Median nerve ultrasonographic measurements were significantly higher in patients. The cross-sectional area of the median nerve at the tunnel inlet was found to be the most useful diagnostic criterion. The optimal cut-off value was 6.5 mm2 (sensitivity 89.5%, specificity 93%). Ultrasound parameters failed to correlate with the electrophysiological findings. The usefulness of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome is discussed.

scholarly journals Ultrasound Measurement of the Cross-Sectional Area of the Median Nerve: The Effect of Teaching on Measurement Accuracy

Hand ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jared A. Crasto ◽  
Michael E. Scott ◽  
John R. Fowler
Keyword(s):  
Median Nerve ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Cross Sectional Area ◽  
Ultrasound Measurement ◽  
Sectional Area ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Cadaveric Specimen ◽  
Standard Measurement ◽  
The Cross ◽  
Correct Structure

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of concise instruction and guidance on the accuracy of measuring the cross-sectional area of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel inlet. Methods: Seven orthopedic residents and 5 hand fellows obtained serial measurements of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel inlet using a 15-6 MHz ultrasound (US) probe. After a 5-minute teaching session, all participants repeated measurements. A single cadaveric specimen was used. Measurements were compared with the measurement of a fellowship-trained hand surgeon with extensive experience in US diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. This was considered the reference standard. Results: The rate of participants selecting the correct structure to measure on US was 36% before instruction and 97% after. Discarding the measurements of the incorrect structure, the average measurement was 4.8 mm2 before instruction and 5.2 mm2 after. The standard measurement was 6 mm2. The average deviation from the standard measurement −.2 mm2 before instruction and −0.8 mm2 after. The percent of measurements (of the correct structure) that fell within 1 mm2 of the standard measurement increased from 62% to 74%. Participant self-reported confidence in performing measurements elevated from 2.4/10 before instruction to 6.5/10 after. Conclusions: US of the median nerve cross-sectional area can be efficiently taught and results in measurements consistent with that of an experienced operator.

scholarly journals Ultrasonographic evaluation of the median nerve at the level of the carpal tunnel outlet and mid forearm in patients with type II Mucopolysaccharidosis

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corina Bocsa ◽  
Carmen Asavoaie ◽  
Simona Bucerzan ◽  
Ioana Nascu ◽  
Irina Brumboiu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Nerve ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Cross Sectional Area ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Sectional Area ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Mps Ii ◽  
The Cross ◽  
The Right

Aims: The ultrasonographic (US) evaluation of the median nerve at the level of the carpal tunnel outlet (CTO) and mid forearm in pediatric patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPS II) and comparison with healthy subjects. Material and method: Fifteen children with MPS II and 44 healthy children were included in the study and they were divided into three age groups. The cross-sectional area, the appearance of the nerve, and the ratio of the cross-sectional areas were evaluated by US. Results: At the level of the CTO the mean area of the nerve was increased in all MPS II groups compared with the correspondent healthy age groups and the differences were statistically significant (p<0.01). At the level of the mid forearm the differences were statistically significant only for the first age group. Other US findings at the level of the CTO in the MPS II groups were represented by hypoechogenicity (86.67 % on the right and 93.33% on the left), thickened fascicles (80% bilaterally), irregular contour (53.33% bilaterally) and the presence of the Doppler signal including the nerve (26.67 % on the right and 33.33 % on the left). The CTO/mid forearm cross-sectional area ratio was higher in all MPS II age groups and the differences were statistically significant (p<0.001). Conclusion: In patients with MPS II there are significant US changes in the size and aspect of the median nerve.

scholarly journals Ultrasound Assessment of the Median Nerve Does Not Adequately Discriminate the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome among Patients Diagnosed with Diabetes

Diabetology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 226-231
Author(s):  
Carlos Antonio Guillen-Astete ◽  
Monica Luque-Alarcon ◽  
Nuria Garcia-Montes
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Median Nerve ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Cross Sectional Area ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Sectional Area ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
Ultrasound Assessment ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most prevalent peripheral nerve entrapment condition of the upper limb. Among metabolic risk factors, diabetes is considered the most relevant. Although wrist ultrasound assessment of the median nerve has demonstrated a good correlation with the gold standard for the diagnosis of this syndrome, neurophysiological study, its usefulness in patients with diabetes is questionable because the compressive phenomenon is not the predominant one. Method: We conducted a retrospective study to compare the clinical and median nerve ultrasound features of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome previously diagnosed or not diagnosed with diabetes. Additionally, a linear multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine to what extent the cross-sectional area of the median nerve was dependent on the condition of diabetes by fixing other variables such as sex, age, or time of evolution. Results: We included 303 records of patients (mean age 44.3 ± 11.7 years old, 57.89% female, mean of time of evolution 13.6 ± 8.3 months) from 2012 to 2020. The cross-sectional area of the median nerve was 10.46 ± 1.44 mm2 in non-diabetic patients and 8.92 ± 0.9 mm2 in diabetic patients (p < 0.001). Additionally, diabetic patients had a shorter time of evolution (7.91 ± 8.28 months vs. 14.36 ± 0.526 months, p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the resultant model (fixed R-square = 0.659, p = 0.003) included a constant of the following four variables: the evolution time (Beta coeff. = 0.108, p < 0.001 95% CI 0.091 to 0.126, standardized coeff. = 0.611), the condition of diabetes (Beta coeff. = −0.623, p < 0.001 95% CI −0.907 to −0.339, standardized coeff. = −0.152), the severity (Beta coeff. = 0.359, p = 0.001 95% CI 0.147 to 0.571, standardized coeff. = 0.169), and the masculine sex (Beta coeff. = 0.309, p = 0.003, 95% CI 0.109 to 0.509, standardized coeff. = 0.103). Conclusions: Ultrasound assessment of the median nerve in patients with diabetes is not a useful tool to confirm whether carpal tunnel syndrome should be diagnosed or not diagnosed.

scholarly journals Bifid Median Nerve in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Assessment with US Cross-sectional Area Measurement

Radiology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 259 (3) ◽  
pp. 808-815 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea S. Klauser ◽  
Ethan J. Halpern ◽  
Ralph Faschingbauer ◽  
Florian Guerra ◽  
Carlo Martinoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Median Nerve ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Cross Sectional Area ◽  
Area Measurement ◽  
Sectional Area ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

scholarly journals Value of cross-sectional area of median nerve by MRI in carpal tunnel syndrome

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 654-659
Author(s):  
Jin Sung Park ◽  
Hee-Chan Won ◽  
Jin-Young Oh ◽  
Dong-Hee Kim ◽  
Sun-Chul Hwang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Median Nerve ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Cross Sectional Area ◽  
Sectional Area ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document