scholarly journals The equity premium puzzle and the risk-free rate puzzle

1989 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 401-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Weil
2007 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 214-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARTIN BOILEAU ◽  
REBECCA BRAEU

We evaluate whether the spirit of capitalism improves the ability of the real business cycle model to explain the main features of both asset return and the business cycle. In our model, the spirit of capitalism is embodied in the assumption that individuals have preferences for financial wealth. Our simulation results suggest that this assumption may improve the model's ability to explain the risk-free rate puzzle but not the equity premium puzzle. This assumption also markedly deteriorates the model's ability to account for the main features of the business cycle.


2007 ◽  
Vol 10 (06) ◽  
pp. 939-965 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARC GÜRTLER ◽  
NORA HARTMANN

Since the equity premium as well as the risk-free rate puzzle question the concepts central to financial and economic modeling, we apply behavioral decision theory to asset pricing in view of solving these puzzles. US stock market data for the period 1960–2003 and German stock market data for the period 1977–2003 show that emotional investors who act in accordance to Bell's [6] disappointment theory — a special case of prospect theory — and additionally administer mental accounts demand a high equity premium. Furthermore, these investors reason a low risk-free rate. However, Barberis et al. [5] already showed that limited rational investors demand a high equity premium. But as opposed to them, our approach additionally supports dividend smoothing.


Author(s):  
Tobias J. Moskowitz ◽  
Annette Vissing-Jorgensen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document