On “Ratio scales of sensory and affective verbal pain descriptors”

Pain ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wayne Hall
Pain ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard H. Gracely ◽  
Patricia McGrath ◽  
Ronald Dubner

Pain ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard H. Gracely ◽  
Patricia McGrath ◽  
Ronald Dubner

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brigitte Tampin ◽  
Christopher Lind ◽  
Angela Jacques ◽  
Helen Slater

Abstract Objectives The study aimed to investigate if patients with lumbar radicular pain only and those with combined lumbar radicular pain + radiculopathy differ in their somatosensory profiles and pain experiences. Methods Quantitative sensory testing (QST) was performed in 26 patients (mean age 47 ± 10 years, 10 females) with unilateral leg pain in the L5 or S1 distribution in their main pain area (MPA) and contralateral mirror side, in the relevant foot dermatome on the symptomatic side and in the hand dorsum. Pain experience was captured on the painDETECT. Results Eight patients presented with lumbar radicular pain only and 18 patients with combined radicular pain + radiculopathy. Patients with radicular pain only demonstrated widespread loss of function (mechanical detection) bilaterally in the MPA (p<0.003) and hand (p=0.002), increased heat sensitivity in both legs (p<0.019) and cold/heat sensitivity in the hand (p<0.024). QST measurements in the dermatome did not differ compared to HCs and patients with radiculopathy. Patients with lumbar radiculopathy were characterised by a localised loss of function in the symptomatic leg in the MPA (warm, mechanical, vibration detection, mechanical pain threshold, mechanical pain sensitivity p<0.031) and dermatome (mechanical, vibration detection p<0.001), consistent with a nerve root lesion. Pain descriptors did not differ between the two groups with the exception of numbness (p<0.001). Patients with radicular pain did not report symptoms of numbness, while 78% of patients with radiculopathy did. Conclusions Distinct differences in somatosensory profiles and pain experiences were demonstrated for each patient group, suggesting differing underlying pain mechanisms.


2007 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 2559-2563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niels Hansen ◽  
Thomas Klein ◽  
Walter Magerl ◽  
Rolf-Detlef Treede

Long-term potentiation of human pain perception (nociceptive LTP) to single electrical test stimuli was induced by high-frequency stimulation (HFS) of cutaneous nociceptive afferents. Numerical pain ratings and a list of sensory pain descriptors disclosed the same magnitude of nociceptive LTP (23% increase for >60 min, P < 0.001), whereas affective pain descriptors were not significantly enhanced. Factor analysis of the sensory pain descriptors showed that facilitation was restricted to two factors characterized by hot and burning (+41%) and piercing and stinging (+21%, both P < 0.01), whereas a factor represented by throbbing and beating was not significantly increased (+9%, P = 0.47). The increased perception of the burning pain quality for >1 h after HFS is interpreted as a LTP-like facilitation of the conditioned cutaneous C-fiber pathway. Additionally, the increase of the stinging pain quality supplied evidence for facilitation of a sharpness-sensitive Aδ-fiber pathway.


Author(s):  
William Wedley

Saaty’s 1977 article is his first comprehensive publication of the ideas behind AHP. He reveals his creativity in a new method for ratio measurement that includes pairwise ratio matrices, derived ratio scales from those matrices, and checks on the consistency of data.  His ingenuity in using ratio measures is revealed by the use of hierarchical structures to display priorities and then a rescaling of them in a manner that allows synthesis for a composite ratio result. Face validity is provided by many supporting examples and mathematical validity is provided by the solution to many theorems. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v9i3.532


2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 418-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret Legarreta ◽  
Elliott Bueler ◽  
Jennifer M. DiMuzio ◽  
Erin McGlade ◽  
Deborah Yurgelun-Todd

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. S21
Author(s):  
S. Swank ◽  
N. Stegenga ◽  
W. Fredericks ◽  
R. Harden

2019 ◽  
Vol Volume 12 ◽  
pp. 1721-1732 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Galli ◽  
B. Lenggenhager ◽  
G. Scivoletto ◽  
A.M. Giannini ◽  
M. Pazzaglia

1999 ◽  
Vol 170 ◽  
pp. 36-40
Author(s):  
Tyler E. Nordgren ◽  
Arsen R. Hajian

AbstractStellar spectra have been obtained using a multichannel Fourier Transform Spectrometer (FTS) which incorporates components of the Navy Prototype Optical Interferometer. It is well known that a FTS can provide superior wavelength stability as compared to traditional spectrometers. Unfortunately the FTS traditionally suffers from exceptionally poor sensitivity, which until now has limited its uses to sources with high fluxes and/or those with narrow band emission (e.g. the Sun, nebulae, and laboratory samples). We present stellar observations using a new FTS design which overcomes this sensitivity limitation by using a conventional multichannel spectrometer in conjunction with the FTS system. The signal-to-noise ratio of spectra from our test-bed observations are consistent with the theoretical prediction and show that for N channels the sensitivity scales like N, while the signal-to-noise ratio scales like . With this type of an instrument on a 3-m telescope and 9 000 channels we expect to be able to detect and measure such exciting astrophysical phenomenon as gravitational redshifts from single, main sequence stars and extrasolar planets of terrestrial mass.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document