Optimisation of heat exchanger design in a thermoacoustic engine using a second law analysis

1996 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 325-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Ishikawa ◽  
P.A. Hobson
1991 ◽  
Vol 113 (2) ◽  
pp. 329-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. B. Evans ◽  
M. R. von Spakovsky

In this paper, two fundamental principles of differential Second Law analysis are set forth for heat exchanger design. The first principle defines a Second Law temperature, while the second principle defines a Second Law temperature difference. The square of the ratio of the Second Law temperature difference to the Second Law temperature is shown always to be equal to the negative of the partial derivative of the rate of entropy generation (for heat transfer) with respect to the overall conductance of the heat exchanger. For the basic design of elementary heat exchangers, each of these two Second Law quantities is shown to take the form of a simple geometric average. Nonelementary considerations result in corrected geometric averages, which relate directly to the corrected log-mean temperature difference. Both the corrected log-mean temperature difference (nonelementary considerations) and the uncorrected or just log-mean temperature difference (elementary considerations) are widely used in heat exchanger analysis. The importance of these two principles in both exergy and essergy analysis is illustrated by a unified basic treatment of the optimum design of elementary heat exchangers. This results in a single optimization expression for all flow arrangements (i.e., counterflow, parallel flow, and certain crossflow cases).


Energy ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 939-955 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung-Yang San ◽  
Chin-Lon Jan

Entropy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vicente Pérez-García ◽  
Juan Belman-Flores ◽  
José Rodríguez-Muñoz ◽  
Víctor. Rangel-Hernández ◽  
Armando Gallegos-Muñoz

1995 ◽  
Vol 117 (3) ◽  
pp. 186-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. A. Sama

The use of second law analysis to design a heat exchanger network is compared with the pinch technology approach. Differences between the two methods are identified and discussed in the light of claims made by practitioners of pinch technology. Second law insights are used to easily identify and correct design errors in a heat exchanger network, and to design maximum energy recovery networks. More importantly, it is found that use of the second law provides an understanding of the process which is totally absent in the pinch technology approach. The claims that pinch technology can find global optimum solutions, that only pinch technology can find maximum energy recovery heat exchanger networks, and that pinch technology is a form of second law analysis, are considered, discussed, and shown to be invalid.


Author(s):  
Philipp Holzemer-Zerhusen ◽  
Stefan Brendelberger ◽  
Martin Roeb ◽  
Christian Sattler

Abstract In solar thermochemical redox cycles for H2O/CO2-splitting, a large portion of the overall energy demand of the system is associated with heating the redox material from the oxidation temperature to the reduction temperature. Hence, an important measure to improve the efficiency is recuperation of sensible heat stored in the redox material. A solid-solid heat exchanger can be subject to undesirable oxygen crossover, which decreases the oxygen uptake capacity of the redox material and consequently the system efficiency. We investigate the extent of this crossover in ceria based cycles, to identify, under which conditions a heat exchanger that allows oxygen crossover can improve the system efficiency. In a thermodynamic analysis we calculate the amount of transferred oxygen as a function of the heat exchanger efficiency and show the system efficiency of such a concept. A second law analysis is applied to the model to check the feasibility of calculated points of operation. For the investigated parameter set the heat exchanger design improves the system efficiency by a factor of up to 2.1.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document