Factors influencing local relapse and survival and results of salvage treatment after breast-conserving therapy in operable breast cancer: EORTC trial 10801, breast conservation compared with mastectomy in TNM stage I and II breast cancer

1992 ◽  
Vol 28 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 801-805 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.A van Dongen ◽  
H Bartelink ◽  
I.S Fentiman ◽  
T Lerut ◽  
F Mignolet ◽  
...  
1992 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 976-983 ◽  
Author(s):  
A S Lichter ◽  
M E Lippman ◽  
D N Danforth ◽  
T d'Angelo ◽  
S M Steinberg ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Mastectomy versus excisional biopsy (lumpectomy) plus radiation for the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer was compared in a prospective randomized study. PATIENTS AND METHODS From 1979 to 1987, 247 women were randomized and 237 were treated on this study. All patients received a full axillary dissection and all node-positive patients received adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin. Radiation consisted of external-beam therapy to the whole breast with or without supraclavicular nodal irradiation followed by a boost to the tumor bed. RESULTS The minimum time on the study was 18 months and the median time on the study was 68 months. No differences in overall survival or disease-free survival were observed. Actuarial estimates at 5 years showed that 85% of mastectomy-treated patients were alive compared with 89% of the lumpectomy/radiation patients (P2 = .49; 95% two-sided confidence interval [CI] about this difference, 0% to 9% favoring lumpectomy plus radiation). The probability of failure in the irradiated breast was 12% by 5 years and 20% by 8 years according to actuarial estimates. Of 15 local breast failures, 14 were treated with and 12 were controlled by mastectomy; the ultimate local-regional control was similar in both arms of the trial. CONCLUSION These data add further weight to the conclusion that breast conservation using lumpectomy and breast irradiation is equivalent to mastectomy in terms of survival and ultimate local control for stage I and II breast cancer patients.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (30) ◽  
pp. 4939-4947 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather A. Jones ◽  
Ninja Antonini ◽  
Augustinus A.M. Hart ◽  
Johannes L. Peterse ◽  
Jean-Claude Horiot ◽  
...  

Purpose To investigate the long-term impact of pathologic characteristics and an extra boost dose of 16 Gy on local relapse, for stage I and II invasive breast cancer patients treated with breast conserving therapy (BCT). Patients and Methods In the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer boost versus no boost trial, after whole breast irradiation, patients with microscopically complete excision of invasive tumor, were randomly assigned to receive or not an extra boost dose of 16 Gy. For a subset of 1,616 patients central pathology review was performed. Results The 10-year cumulative risk of local breast cancer relapse as a first event was not significantly influenced if the margin was scored negative, close or positive for invasive tumor or ductal carcinoma in situ according to central pathology review (log-rank P = .45 and P = .57, respectively). In multivariate analysis, high-grade invasive ductal carcinoma was associated with an increased risk of local relapse (P = .026; hazard ratio [HR], 1.67), as was age younger than 50 years (P < .0001; HR, 2.38). The boost dose of 16 Gy significantly reduced the local relapse rate (P = .0006; HR, 0.47). For patients younger than 50 years old and in patients with high grade invasive ductal carcinoma, the boost dose reduced the local relapse from 19.4% to 11.4% (P = .0046; HR, 0.51) and from 18.9% to 8.6% (P = .01; HR, 0.42), respectively. Conclusion Young age and high-grade invasive ductal cancer were the most important risk factors for local relapse, while margin status had no significant influence. A boost dose of 16 Gy significantly reduced the negative effects of both young age and high-grade invasive cancer.


Author(s):  
Smitha V. Gollamudi ◽  
Rebecca S. Gelman ◽  
Gloria Peiro ◽  
Lindsey Schneider ◽  
James L. Connolly ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 263-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joo Hyun O ◽  
Woo Hee Choi ◽  
Eun Ji Han ◽  
Eun-Kyoung Choi ◽  
Byung Joo Chae ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 119 ◽  
pp. S241
Author(s):  
I. Kindts ◽  
A. Laenen ◽  
S. Peeters ◽  
H. Janssen ◽  
T. Depuydt ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document