Characteristics and outcome of children with renal tumors in the Netherlands: The first five-year’s experience of national centralization

Around 6% of all childhood malignancies represent renal tumors, of which a majority includes Wilms tumor (WT). Although survival rates have improved over the last decades, specific patients are still at risk for adverse outcome. In the Netherlands, since 2015, pediatric oncology care for renal tumors has been centralized in the Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology. Here, we describe experiences of the first 5 years of centralized care and explore whether this influences the epidemiological landscape by comparing data with the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). We identified all patients <19 years with a renal mass diagnosed between 01-01-2015 and 31-12-2019 in the Princess Máxima Center. Epidemiology, characteristics and management were analyzed. We identified 164 patients (including 1 patient who refused consent for registration), in our center with a suspicion of a renal tumor. The remaining 163 cases included WT (n = 118)/cystic partially differentiated nephroblastoma (n = 2)/nephrogenic rests only (n = 6) and non-WT (n = 37). In this period, the NCR included 138 children, 1 17-year-old patient was not referred to the Princess Máxima Center. Central radiology review (before starting treatment) was performed in 121/163 patients, and central pathology review in 148/152 patients that underwent surgery. Treatment stratification, according to SIOP/EpSSG protocols was pursued based on multidisciplinary consensus. Preoperative chemotherapy was administered in 133 patients, whereas 19 patients underwent upfront surgery. Surgery was performed in 152 patients, and from 133 biomaterial was stored. Centralization of care for children with renal tumors led to referral of all but 1 new renal tumor cases in the Netherlands, and leads to referral of very rare subtypes not registered in the NCR, that benefit from high quality diagnostics and multidisciplinary decision making. National centralization of care led to enhanced development of molecular diagnostics and other innovation-based treatments for the future.

Tubulointerstitial nephritis and uveitis in Northern Ireland

Objectives This paper looks at patients with a diagnosis of tubulointerstitial nephritis and uveitis (TINU) presenting to the Northern Ireland regional adult and paediatric uveitis service in the Belfast Health and Social Care Trust. The demographic distribution, treatment required and the visual and renal outcomes of these patients are documented. Methods Data were collected retrospectively on 24 patients with TINU using the Northern Ireland Electronic Care Record, central pathology records alongside the adult and paediatric uveitis databases from 2011 to 2021. Patients were categorised into two groups using the Mandeville classification system. Standard Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) was used to classify the uveitis. Results The population prevalence is at least 12.6 cases per million based on a population of 1.9 million. Nineteen of 24 cases were definite TINU and five of 24 probable. Seventeen out of 24 had biopsy-positive TIN, all of which met all of the Mandeville clinical diagnostic features required for a definite diagnosis. All but one presented with acute bilateral anterior uveitis. The paediatric cases ranged from age 12 to 18 at age of onset with a mean age of 14. Of the 18 adult onset cases, the age ranged from 20 to 76 years. The mean age of onset for the adult cases was 53 years. Of these patients 71% were female; 42% required second-line immunosuppression for ocular disease. Visual acuity was maintained. Follow-up time ranged from 3 months to 16 years. No patient developed long-term renal impairment. Conclusions TINU is a cause of uveitis in both the paediatric and adult populations. In Northern Ireland average age with TINU was older than much of the published literature. Long-term immunosuppression for uveitis may be required as ongoing ocular, rather than renal inflammation seemed to require treatment.

GEIS 39: Phase II trial of nabpaclitaxel for the treatment of patient with multiply relapsed/refractory desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) and Ewing sarcoma (EwS).

11529 Background: Nab-paclitaxel (albumin-bound paclitaxel) has shown preclinical activity against pediatric solid tumors. Preclinical data in EwS PDX models suggested high activity of nab-paclitaxel in tumors expressing high-levels of SPARC. Tumoral SPARC facilitates the accumulation of albumin in the tumor and increases the effectiveness of albumin-bound paclitaxel. Nab-paclitaxel utilizes albumin to deliver paclitaxel via caveolin-mediated endocytosis which is expressed in the EwS cells surface. We hypothesized that SPARC can be a predictive biomarker for nab-paclitaxel in EwS and DSRCT that could potentially be relevant for a better design of clinical trials and personalized treatments using nab-paclitaxel. Methods: Main endpoint of GEIS-39 was the overall response rate (ORR) assessed by RECIST 1.1 criteria with centralized pathology and imaging review. Secondary objectives included safety according to the CTCAE 4.0 criteria. Patients aged ≥ 6 months and ≤ 40 years, with relapsed/refractory DSRCT were eligible after having received at least one previous poly-chemotherapy line; EwS must have received at least two standard chemotherapy lines. Prior taxane therapy was accepted. Central pathology review selected for tumors with > Grade 3 (intense and diffuse) expression of SPARC by immunohistochemistry to be eligible. Nab-paclitaxel was administered as follows: age ≥ 21 and ≤ 40 years: 125 mg/m2 days 1, 8 and 15 in cycles of 28 days; age ≥ 6 months and ≤ 20 years: 240 mg/m2 days 1, 8 and 15 in cycles of 28 days. A 30% ORR was anticipated with a sample size of 25 patients needed to test the hypothesis. Stopping rule was set at 1 response within the first 16 treated pts. If 5 or more successes were observed in 25 pts, the results of the trial will warrant further investigation. Results: Twenty-nine patients were enrolled from June 2017 until October 2019, 11 DSRCT and 18 EwS. Median age was 32 years (range 14-69), and 5 females and 24 males were included, having received a median of 3 previous systemic treatment lines. Patients received a median of 3 cycles of nab-paclitaxel (range 1-17). In the EwS cohort an ORR of 33.3% (all partial responses, median duration 2 months) and 16.7% of stabilizations were achieved. No objective responses were observed among DSRCT pts, but 27.3% of pts achieved a stabilization. Overall, median progression free survival was 2.8 months and median overall survival 12.1 months, with no significant differences between DSRCT and EwS cohorts. Most common grade 3 toxicities were neutropenia (20.7%) and diarrhea (10.3%). Conclusions: Single agent nab-paclitaxel in biomarker selected EwS patients, but not in DSRCT, provided clinically meaningful activity that deserves further development. Nab-paclitaxel had a manageable adverse event profile. Clinical trial information: 2016-002464-14.

‘Cochlear-type’ hearing loss as part of aquaporin-4 neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder is an inflammatory autoimmune central nervous system condition caused in the majority of cases by aquaporin-4 IgG antibodies. Aquaporin-4 is expressed in the cochlear and vestibular nuclei regions in the brainstem and a handful of cases of retro-cochlear type hearing loss have been documented in the literature. Aquaporin-4 has also been reported within the organ of Corti and the cristae and maculae of the vestibular apparatus. We present a case where there is evidence of peripheral (labyrinthine) rather than central pathology and propose this is due to autoimmune inflammation as part of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. This is the first case in the literature suggesting a ‘cochlear-type’ hearing loss occurring as part of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. It raises the possibility of peripheral relapses of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder going unnoticed, resulting in patient morbidity, and highlights the importance of research within this area.

Acute erythroid leukemia is enriched in NUP98 fusions: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group

Acute erythroid leukemia (AEL) is a rare subtype of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) primarily affecting older adults and was previously classified into erythroid/myeloid and pure erythroid subtypes. In this pediatric AEL study, we evaluated morphologic, immunophenotypic, cytogenetic, molecular, and clinical data of 24 (1.2%) cases from all cases undergoing central pathology review in Children’s Oncology Group trials AAML0531 and AAML1031. Of 24 cases, 5 had a pure erythroid phenotype, and 19 had an erythroid/myeloid phenotype. NUP98 fusions were highly enriched in patients with AEL, occurring in 7 of 22 cases for which molecular data were available (31.8% vs 6.7% in other AML subtypes). Of 5 cases of pure erythroid leukemias (PELs), 3 had NUP98 fusions, and 4 had complex karyotypes. Erythroid/myeloid leukemias were reclassified by using the 2017 World Health Organization hematopathology classification as: myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with excess blasts-1 (n = 3), MDS with excess blasts-2 (n = 7), AML (nonerythroid, n = 5), and unknown MDS/AML (n = 4); the 5 cases of nonerythroid AML included 1 with an NUP98–NSD1 fusion, 2 with myelodysplasia-related changes, and 1 with a complex karyotype. Three cases of MDS with excess blasts-2 also had NUP98 rearrangements. WT1 mutations were present in 5 of 14 cases, all erythroid/myeloid leukemia. Outcomes assessment revealed statistically poorer overall survival (5-year, 20% ± 36% vs 66% ± 23%; P = .004) and event-free survival (5-year, 20% ± 36% vs 46% ± 23%; P = .019) for those with PEL than those with erythroid/myeloid leukemia. Our study supports that AEL is a morphologically and genetically heterogeneous entity that is enriched in NUP98 fusions, with the pure erythroid subtype associated with particularly adverse outcomes.

MBCL-34. EFFICACY OF METHOTREXATE (MTX) ACCORDING TO MOLECULAR SUB-TYPE IN YOUNG CHILDREN WITH MEDULLOBLASTOMA (MB): A REPORT FROM CHILDREN’S ONCOLOGY GROUP PHASE III TRIAL ACNS0334

ACNS0334, a Phase 3 trial, compared outcomes of children &lt;36 months treated with intensive chemotherapy +/-high-dose methotrexate. Nodular-desmoplastic M0-stage MB were excluded. Treatment included 3 induction cycles (cyclophosphamide/etoposide/vincristine/cisplatin+/-mtx) and 3 consolidation cycles (carboplatin/thiotepa with stem cell rescue). Radiation (RT) was at physician discretion. Molecular sub-typing was by DNA-methylation. Log-rank testing was used to compare survival differences. Molecular sub-typing of 38 MB identified 11 Sonic Hedgehog (SHH), 25 Group 3 (GP3), 2 Group 4 (GP4). Five-year survival (OS) was 100% for 5 SHH with MTX and 4 SHH without MTX; 80% for 10 GP3 with MTX, 40% for 15 GP3 without MTX (p=0.025). Only 6/14 survivors received RT: 4 for residual following therapy (1 SHH and 3 GP3) and 2 GP3 salvaged after progression. Two GP3 deaths were associated with toxicity; all others were due to disease. Histology among SHH was nodular-desmoplastic (8) or classic (3); GP3 histology was classic (17) or anaplastic (7). Whole-exome sequencing identified 6 somatic PTCH1 and 1 germline SUFU alteration(s) among 9 SHH. Among GP3, no p53 mutations were found; copy-number analysis identified 5/25 with myc-amplification, 5/25 iso17q, 11/25 with 8 loss, 14/25 with loss of 11. Among GP3, 14/19 had no significant germline mutation. ACNS0334 achieved 100% survival for metastatic SHH. Benefit of methotrexate was observed in GP3 MB supporting incorporation of methotrexate into standard therapy for GP3. Upfront central pathology review and molecular sub-typing are critical for future clinical trial risk stratification of young children with embryonal tumors.

PATH-09. SJMB12 CLINICAL TRIAL: DISCREPANCY BETWEEN LOCAL AND CENTRAL PATHOLOGY IN ASSESSING ANAPLASTIC MEDULLOBLASTOMA – REPORT FROM A SINGLE SITE EXPERIENCE

INTRODUCTION SJMB12 is a phase 2 clinical trial led by the St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital (St. Jude) that enrolls patients with medulloblastoma based on their biological subgroup. The large cell/anaplastic (LCA) histologic variant has been identified as an important independent risk factor associated with poor outcome. However, the histologic criteria for LCA is subjective, making the distinction between anaplastic and non-anaplastic medulloblastoma difficult in some cases. METHODS Pathological central review was performed at St. Jude. For all patients enrolled in the study to date, concordance was assessed between the initial and central review diagnosis and histologic variant calls made at the Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne (RCH) and at St. Jude, respectively. RESULTS Since the SJMB12 clinical trial opened locally in 2014, 34 patients were enrolled, and 31 were eligible for this retrospective study. A total of 12 (39%) cases with discordance were identified. The most frequent disagreement was between the designation of LCA (10 cases, 32%). In five cases the tumour was not designated as LCA variant locally. In five cases the initial designation of LCA was refuted centrally. Overall, this led to a change of treatment stratum for four patients (13%). CONCLUSION A high discordance rate exists between neuropathologists in the designation of LCA variant. Differences in interpretation of the subjective histologic criteria and inconsistencies in the material submitted for central review contributed to the discordance. Incorporation of more objective histologic criteria and implementation of unbiased diagnostic tools may improve the generalisability of future risk stratification.

Targeted Sequencing of 7 Genes Can Help Reduce Pathologic Misclassification of MDS

Introduction: The NHLBI National MDS Study (NCT02775383) is a prospective cohort study conducted at 92 community hospitals and 29 academic centers. It enrolls patients undergoing work up for suspected MDS to understand the genetic, epigenetic, and biological factors associated with the initiation and progression of the disease. Previously untreated, cytopenic participants undergo both local and centralized pathology review and are assigned a diagnosis, including MDS, MDS/MPN, AML with blasts &lt; 30%, and "Other". Emerging data suggests that Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), along with cytogenetics and clinical variables, may improve MDS diagnostic precision. Given that our study relies on central review (with additional tertiary pathology review used to adjudicate disagreements), we examined whether targeted gene sequencing data could be used to increase the agreement between local and central pathologic diagnosis of MDS vs. Other. Methods: Peripheral blood and bone marrow (BM) biopsy specimens from cytopenic patients, along with clinical history, CBC, and other results including karyotyping, FISH and pathology reports from local pathologists were reviewed by central pathologists. The updated 2016 WHO classifications were used to diagnose MDS. Targeted exon sequencing of 96 genes was performed using BM specimens. A subset of 648 individuals that were classified as MDS (n=212) or Other (n=436, including 90 CCUS and 89 individuals with other cancers) by pathology assessments were selected. A mean coverage of 1,317X was achieved and variants had a minimum variant allele frequency (VAF) of 2% (except FLT3). Variants for 596 subjects were manually reviewed to retain likely disease-causing variants to build a binary classifier (MDS vs. Other) using the maximum VAF per gene as input (Figure 1). Subjects diagnosed with MDS or Other by both central and local pathology were used for training, validation, and testing, and were considered "gold standard" (GS) cases (n=546). These subjects were split into 4 random groups with equal proportions of MDS cases. 75% of the GS cases were used to train and validate lasso-regularized logistic regression models using 3-fold cross validation. ROC curve analysis was carried out using the remaining 25% of GS cases (Test Set 1) on the best model to identify an optimal probability cut off point for classifying subjects as MDS. Model performance was then tested on 50 subjects for which the central and local pathology diagnosis disagreed (Test Set 2), as well as on 52 additional subjects irrespective of agreement (Test Set 3). Results : The best performing logistic regression model retained 7 genes as most informative in a discriminating diagnosis of MDS from Other based on their VAFs, in order of impact: TP53, SF3B1, U2AF1, ASXL1, TET2,STAG2, and SRSF2. We used this model to assign probabilities for each of the subjects in Test Set 1 and to estimate the performance using ROC analysis (Figure 1), resulting in a high area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89. We chose a probability cut-off of ≥0.17, being associated with a high percentage of correct classification of MDS with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.90 and 0.81, respectively. Among the cohort of 50 subjects with a discordant local and central pathology diagnosis (Test Set 2), the classifier accurately reassigned 37 subjects (accuracy = 74%) from the local to the central pathology. The blinded tertiary pathology reviewer agreed with central in all Test Set 2 cases. This included 24/34 MDS cases that had been labeled as Other by local pathology (positive predictive value [PPV]=0.89). 3/16 final pathology-classified Other cases were mis-classified as MDS by the local pathologist (negative predictive value [NPV] = 0.57). Next, we assessed the ability of the model to predict MDS vs. Other for 52 additional independent subjects using the third pathologist's diagnosis to break any ties (Test Set 3). The classifier correctly predicted 15/21 MDS cases (PPV=0.83) and misclassified 6/31 Others as MDS (NPV=0.82). The overall accuracy was 83%. Conclusions: We identified that VAFs for 7 genes can correctly re-classify subjects as either MDS or Other in 74% of cases that were misclassified between local and central pathology review. Further assessment on an independent cohort showed an accuracy of 83% of the model. Taken together, these data suggest that complementing pathology reviews with targeted sequencing of 7 genes could improve MDS diagnosis. Disclosures Lindsley: MedImmune: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Bejar:Aptose Biosciences: Current Employment; AbbVie/Genentech: Honoraria; Astex/Otsuka: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Forty-Seven/Gilead: Honoraria; Genoptix/NeoGenomics: Honoraria. DeZern:MEI: Consultancy; Astex: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Foran:H3Biosciences: Research Funding; Aptose: Research Funding; Kura Oncology: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Revolution Medicine: Consultancy; Xencor: Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Aprea: Research Funding; Actinium: Research Funding; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Research Funding; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding. Gore:Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Komrokji:Acceleron: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Agios: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Geron: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Maciejewski:Alexion, BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis, Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Padron:Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Kura: Research Funding. Starczynowski:Captor Therapeutics: Consultancy; Tolero Therapeutics: Research Funding; Kurome Therapeutics: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company, Research Funding. Sekeres:BMS: Consultancy; Takeda/Millenium: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy.