Induction of immune tolerance in hemophiliacs with inhibitors, by combined treatment with IVIG, cyclophosphamide and factor VIII or IX–the Malmö model

Author(s):  
INGAMARIE NILSSON ◽  
ERIK BERNTORP
1985 ◽  
Vol 54 (04) ◽  
pp. 776-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
U Hedner ◽  
L Tengborn

SummaryImmune tolerance has by several methods been induced in haemophiliacs with antibodies. A conversion of “high responders” into “low responders” was previously reported after repeated moderate factor IX doses over periods of 7-10 days in combination with cyclophosphamide and steroids in two patients with haemophilia B and inhibitors. This paper reports similar results in a heamophilia A patient by giving factor VIII, cyclophosphamide, and steroids during relatively short periods of time (7-8 days). The anamnestic response markedly decreased already following the first treatment and never exceeded a level of 1 u/ml (˜ 3 BU/ml) even when boosted with ordinary factor VIII doses for only 3 days. It is concluded that the markedly decreased secondary antibody response is most probably the result of factor VIII given at short intervals (twice a day) for periods of up to about one week when given in combination with cyclophosphamide and steroids. The same effect may be achieved by other methods. The treatment schedule suggested in the present paper is, however, simple and avoids long periods of high antibody levels. Furthermore, the total factor VIII dose used is lower than suggested in most other treatment schedules, which makes the treatment substantially less expensive.


2011 ◽  
Vol 105 (01) ◽  
pp. 59-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camila Caram ◽  
Roberta Grazielle de Souza ◽  
Júlio Carepa de Sousa ◽  
Tatiana Araújo Pereira ◽  
Ana Maria do Amaral Cerqueira ◽  
...  

SummaryThe development of alloantibodies that inhibit or neutralise the function of factor VIII is considered the most serious complication of the treatment of congenital haemophilia A. In order to describe their course without immune tolerance induction (ITI), we documented data on all performed inhibitor tests with dates as well as on clotting factor infusions of all consecutive patients who were treated in our centre between 1993 and 2006. Patients were tested every 7.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.6–7.8). A ‘sustained negative inhibitor status’ was defined as consistent non-positive inhibitor measurements for two years or longer. A total of 60/486 (12%) patients tested had a positive inhibitor titre in two or more occasions. Most of the patients (56%) with a maximum inhibitor titre of < 5 Bethesda unit (BU)/ml (named “low titre inhibitor”) developed a sustained negative inhibitor status. Among patients with high (5–9.9 BU/ml) and very high (≥ 10 BU/ ml) inhibitor titres, the proportions were 50% and 3%, respectively. Our findings suggest that ITI might not be needed for all patients with non-transient inhibitors, especially when their maximum inhibitor titre is below 10 BU/ml. Further studies in countries where ITI is not available are needed to examine predictors of the natural sustained negative inhibitor status.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document