The Price and Operating Performance of Initial Public Offerings

2017 ◽  
pp. 145-167
Author(s):  
George J. Papaioannou ◽  
Ahmet K. Karagozoglu
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offerings ◽  
Operating Performance ◽  
Public Offerings

MANAJEMEN LABA PADA PERIODASEBELUM DAN SESUDAH PENAWARAN SAHAM PERDANA DI BURSA EFEK JAKARTA: ANALISIS DENGAN MODEL DEANGELO

2006 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 67
Author(s):  
Elisa Indah ◽  
Erny Ekawati
Keyword(s):  
Real Estate ◽  
Earnings Management ◽  
Initial Public Offerings ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Operating Performance ◽  
Discretionary Accruals ◽  
Building Construction ◽  
Financial Statement ◽  
Public Offerings ◽  
Industrial Group

The previous research fotmd empirical evidence about existence of earnings monagement of suuraunding IPO (Initial Public Offerings). Previous reseqrch also found that operating performance at period after IPO less than before IPO. The purposes of this research is to reexamine earnings management surrounding IPO and association earnings manog"*"it surrotmding IPO with the operating performance in Indonesiancapital market.This study uses the companies data conducting IPO on 88 /irms that went at Jakarta Stock Exchange for the periods 1995-2002. Company do not the included in industrial group of property, real estate and building construction, and industrial group of finance. The method used toexamine eantings management are the method that develop by DeAngelo.Ihe result of this study by using t-test is fomd that firms manage theiremnings to increqse reported income before IPO and after IPO. It meansthat IPO issuers make income increasing discretionary accruals in thefmancial statement before IPO and in the financial statement afier IPO.In this study by using double regression examination also found thatoperoting performance after IPO less than before IPO. This conditionis consequence firms conduct earnings managetnent before IPO untilhappen underperformance after IPO.Keywords z IPO, earnings management, income increasing discretionaryaccruals, operating performance, DeAngelo model.

Performance of VC/PE-backed IPOs: New Insights from India

2020 ◽  
pp. 097215092095054
Author(s):  
Soumya G. Deb ◽  
Pradip Banerjee
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offerings ◽  
Private Equity ◽  
Operating Performance ◽  
Equity Market ◽  
Venture Capitalists ◽  
Public Offerings ◽  
Market Perception ◽  
Using Data

This article explores long-term equity and operating performance of Indian firms issuing initial public offerings (IPOs) backed by venture capital/private equity (VC/PE) funding. Using data for 173 IPOs backed by VC/PE funding during 2000–2016, the article shows that equity market performance of VC/PE-backed IPOs is unimpressive post issue, compared to their peers. This is not only due to market perception but also associated with a declining operating performance. However, information asymmetry, mispricing and ‘timing the market’ by issuing firms do not seem to be the reasons for such long-term underperformance. We argue that it may be a case of too much money chasing too few winners for Indian IPOs and individual rent-seeking activities by managers. The observation raises the question of effectiveness of the monitoring role of venture capitalists or PE funders post the IPO in an Indian context. This is substantiated by our additional finding that sustained monitoring and hand-holding by venture capitalists and PE funders post the IPO cause an improvement in performance. The findings of this study can have significant implications for all stakeholders, particularly common investors in the Indian equity market.

The new capital raised in IPOs

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (9) ◽  
pp. 966-981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuntai Jin ◽  
Tianze Li ◽  
Steven Xiaofan Zheng ◽  
Ke Zhong
Keyword(s):  
Research And Development ◽  
Initial Public Offerings ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Capital Expenditure ◽  
Operating Performance ◽  
Working Capital ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Public Offerings ◽  
Regression Tests

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to answer the following three questions about the new capital raised in initial public offerings (IPOs): why do some IPO companies raise a lot of new capital while some others do not? Where do the IPO companies use the new capital they raise in IPOs? How does the use of new capital affect the operating performance of IPO companies? Design/methodology/approach Matching firm approach, univariate and regression tests. Findings This paper finds that companies with higher research and development (R&D) spending, higher capital expenditure, lower working capital and more long-term debt tend to raise more capital in IPOs. These firms also spend more on R&D and capital expenditure. The results also suggest that the more the new capital firms raise in IPOs, the lower operating performance they have in subsequent years. However, firms spending more new capital on R&D and capital expenditure seem to perform better. Originality/value These results help us understand the behavior of IPO firms.

scholarly journals POST‐IPO OPERATING PERFORMANCE IN BANGLADESH

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Md. Sajib Hossain ◽  
Muhammad Saifuddin Khan
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offerings ◽  
Capital Expenditure ◽  
Operating Performance ◽  
Jel Classification ◽  
Significant Decline ◽  
Debt Ratio ◽  
Public Offerings ◽  
Financial Firms ◽  
Asset Turnover ◽  
Over Time

This study attempts to investigate the change in the operating performance of firms as they go from private to public ownership. Using the data of all the non-financial firms, which floated initial public offerings (IPOs) from 2008 to 2015, this study finds that there is a significant decline in operating performance as measured by ROA, asset turnover, ROS, and OCFTA after the IPO and the decline continues for next two to three years with the highest deterioration of operating performance being observed in the immediate next year of IPO. Moreover, when the study uses age, debt ratio, sales, capital expenditure, and IPO event to explain the variation of the operating performance of IPO firms over time, it finds that IPO event negatively affects all measures of operating performance. Finally, the study finds that deterioration of the post-IPO operating performance is more pronounced for firms offering their securities with premium than firms offering securities without premium. JEL Classification Codes: G11, G12, G32.  

scholarly journals A Review Of The Determinants Of Long Run Share Price And Operating Performance Of Initial Public Offerings On The Johannesburg Stock Exchange

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 1161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chimwemwe Chipeta ◽  
Adrian Jardine
Keyword(s):  
South African ◽  
Initial Public Offerings ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Operating Performance ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
International Investment ◽  
Share Price ◽  
Public Offerings ◽  
Johannesburg Stock Exchange ◽  
Long Run

This paper provides some new evidence on the determinants of long run operating and share price performance of Initial Public Offerings (IPO) on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE). It has been hypothesised that the information contained in the pre listing documents could shed some light on the aftermarket performance of South African IPO shares. In line with previous literature, South African IPO shares significantly underperformed the market on average. Additionally, there is a statistically significant negative relationship between IPO Volume and long run performance, suggesting that the South African IPO market may be subject to the fads and over optimism theory of Ritter (1991). The overoptimism hypothesis is further cemented by a negative correlation between pre IPO revenue forecast and aftermarket operating performance. Listing expenses play a moderate role in the reduction of the aftermarket performance of IPOs on the JSE. However, it appears that international investment banks have a positive influence on the aftermarket performance of IPOs on the JSE. Likewise, firms audited by the BIG 4 audit firms tend to perform well in terms of aftermarket buy and hold returns. Large firms at the time of listing tend to perform well and firms with high growth prospects at the time of listing generate a negative and significant return on their investment in total assets. Although the contingent liabilities disclosed in the prelisting reports negatively influence most of the measurers of aftermarket performance, the relationship is, by and large, insignificant.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document