Performance of VC/PE-backed IPOs: New Insights from India

2020 ◽  
pp. 097215092095054
Author(s):  
Soumya G. Deb ◽  
Pradip Banerjee
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offerings ◽  
Private Equity ◽  
Operating Performance ◽  
Equity Market ◽  
Venture Capitalists ◽  
Public Offerings ◽  
Market Perception ◽  
Using Data

This article explores long-term equity and operating performance of Indian firms issuing initial public offerings (IPOs) backed by venture capital/private equity (VC/PE) funding. Using data for 173 IPOs backed by VC/PE funding during 2000–2016, the article shows that equity market performance of VC/PE-backed IPOs is unimpressive post issue, compared to their peers. This is not only due to market perception but also associated with a declining operating performance. However, information asymmetry, mispricing and ‘timing the market’ by issuing firms do not seem to be the reasons for such long-term underperformance. We argue that it may be a case of too much money chasing too few winners for Indian IPOs and individual rent-seeking activities by managers. The observation raises the question of effectiveness of the monitoring role of venture capitalists or PE funders post the IPO in an Indian context. This is substantiated by our additional finding that sustained monitoring and hand-holding by venture capitalists and PE funders post the IPO cause an improvement in performance. The findings of this study can have significant implications for all stakeholders, particularly common investors in the Indian equity market.

scholarly journals Role Of Underwriters In Restraining Earnings Management In Initial Public Offerings

2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hei Wai Lee ◽  
Yan Alice Xie ◽  
Jian Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Earnings Management ◽  
Initial Public Offerings ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Venture Capitalists ◽  
Font Size ◽  
Going Public ◽  
Public Offerings ◽  
Investment Bankers ◽  
Sarbanes Oxley

<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span><p style="margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt; text-align: justify; mso-pagination: none;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">We investigate the </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN;">relationship</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> between underwriter</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN;"> reputation</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> and earnings management of IPO firms over the period of 1991-2005. We find that </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN;">IPO firms engage in less earnings management</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> if </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN;">they</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> are underwritten by prestigious investment bankers. Furthermore, the role of prestigious underwriters in restraining earnings management of IPO issuers do not change during the Internet Bubble period or after the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX). The findings support the certification role of underwriters in the IPO process.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>We also document that</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN;"> firms going public in the post-SOX period engage in less earnings management compared to firms going public in the pre-SOX period</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;">. Further findings suggest that the changing objectives of venture capitalists may explain the reduction in the level of earnings management of IPO firms following the passage of SOX.</span></span></p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span>

Die Fehlbewertung junger Aktiengesellschaften beim Gang an die Börse – Ursachen und wirtschaftspolitische Konsequenzen

2003 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Ploog ◽  
Michael Stolpe
Keyword(s):  
Market Power ◽  
Initial Public Offerings ◽  
Investment Banks ◽  
Policy Options ◽  
Public Offerings ◽  
Speculative Bubbles ◽  
Privatisation Programme ◽  
Welfare Implications

AbstractThis paper discusses policy options to reduce underpricing in initial public offerings (IPOs). It surveys recent theoretical insights into the causes and welfare implications of underpricing and reviews evidence on the signalling hypothesis, the winner’s curse model, the role of underwriters in assessing issuing firms’ future profitability and the genesis of speculative bubbles in IPO markets. The paper concludes that governments should curtail the abuse of market power in underwriting by prohibiting the allocation of shares to insiders and by reducing the incentives for investment banks to exploit underpriced share issues in order to cross-subsidise unrelated lines of business. Moreover, governments should seek to stabilize the IPO market by committing themselves to regular equal-sized issues of shares in government assets as part of a long-term privatisation programme.

INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERINGS AND PRE-IPO SHAREHOLDERS: ANGELS VERSUS VENTURE CAPITALISTS

2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (04) ◽  
pp. 1250022 ◽  
Author(s):  
WILLIAM C. JOHNSON ◽  
JEFFREY E. SOHL
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offerings ◽  
Initial Public Offering ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Equity Capital ◽  
Venture Capitalists ◽  
Public Offerings ◽  
Corporate Investors ◽  
Public Offering ◽  
Angel Investors

At the time of an initial public offering, shares in a firm are typically held by venture capitalists, insiders, corporate investors and angel investors. We examine the role of angel investors in the IPO process. We find that angel investors provide equity capital in industries venture capitalists are less likely to serve and that shareholders in angel backed IPO firms are more likely to sell their shares at the time of the offering. Where venture capital backed IPO firms have higher underpricing, angel backed IPO firms do not, implying that angels may be the preferred investors for early-stage firms.

scholarly journals The Role of Governance and Bank Funding in the Determination of Cornerstone Allocations in Chinese Equity Offers

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul B. McGuinness
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offerings ◽  
Political Connections ◽  
Material Incentive ◽  
Family Resources ◽  
Public Offerings ◽  
Women On Boards ◽  
Bank Funding

This article investigates the causal factors underlying cornerstone investor (CI) participation in initial public offerings in China’s offshore Hong Kong market. Prospectus-based declarations on such allocations suggest that CI undertakings offer strong certification effects. Entrepreneurs planning for IPO thus have a material incentive to court CIs. The present analysis reveals that a firm’s pre-IPO financials and governance attributes strongly correlate with success in this field. Specifically, CI participation is greater in issuers with established long-term loan positions. Firms housing younger CEOs and a greater number of family-connected board officers also generate more CI interest. In contrast, the fraction of independent directors and women on boards exert minimal effect. However, further analysis reveals that greater independent director presence strongly supports CI participation in family-centric entities, but imparts little to no effect on such investment in either state-run or non-family-controlled private issuers. Additionally, an issuer’s political connections galvanize CI participation. Moreover, the present study highlights the importance of family resources (in non-state sponsored entities) and political connections (in state-held firms) in drawing-in CI involvement. Given the spread of CI arrangements to other primary market settings, the present enterprise also offers guidance on anchor investment elsewhere.

The new capital raised in IPOs

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (9) ◽  
pp. 966-981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuntai Jin ◽  
Tianze Li ◽  
Steven Xiaofan Zheng ◽  
Ke Zhong
Keyword(s):  
Research And Development ◽  
Initial Public Offerings ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Capital Expenditure ◽  
Operating Performance ◽  
Working Capital ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Public Offerings ◽  
Regression Tests

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to answer the following three questions about the new capital raised in initial public offerings (IPOs): why do some IPO companies raise a lot of new capital while some others do not? Where do the IPO companies use the new capital they raise in IPOs? How does the use of new capital affect the operating performance of IPO companies? Design/methodology/approach Matching firm approach, univariate and regression tests. Findings This paper finds that companies with higher research and development (R&D) spending, higher capital expenditure, lower working capital and more long-term debt tend to raise more capital in IPOs. These firms also spend more on R&D and capital expenditure. The results also suggest that the more the new capital firms raise in IPOs, the lower operating performance they have in subsequent years. However, firms spending more new capital on R&D and capital expenditure seem to perform better. Originality/value These results help us understand the behavior of IPO firms.

scholarly journals The Short- And Long-Term Performance Of Privatization Initial Public Offerings In Europe

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 1189
Author(s):  
Haykel Hamdi ◽  
Duc Khuong Nguyen ◽  
Hassan Obeid
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offerings ◽  
Abnormal Returns ◽  
Public Offerings ◽  
Market Index ◽  
Long Run ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Long Term Performance ◽  
Term Performance

This article investigates the return behaviorof privatization initial public offerings (PIPOs) in Europe over both theshort- and long-run horizons. Using data from a sample of 162 PIPOs over theperiod 1986-2008, we show that European PIPOs outperform, in terms ofrisk-adjusted abnormal returns, a benchmark market index and a portfoliocomposed of 162 European private IPOs, regardless of the horizon of analysis.Our results are important for both investors and policymakers with respect totheir investment and privatization decisions, and also allow a betterunderstanding of the financial performance behavior of the privatizedstate-owned enterprises.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document