Cell-Based Noninvasive Prenatal Testing: A Promising Path for Prenatal Diagnosis

Author(s):  
Liesbeth Vossaert ◽  
Arthur L. Beaudet
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunsheng Ge ◽  
Jia Li ◽  
Jianlong Zhuang ◽  
Jian Zhang ◽  
Yanru Huang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been wildly used to screen for common aneuplodies. In recent years, the test has been expanded to detect rare autosomal aneuploidies (RATs) and copy number variations (CNVs). This study was performed to investigate the performance of expanded noninvasive prenatal testing (expanded NIPT) in screening for common trisomies, sex chromosomal aneuploidies (SCAs), rare autosomal aneuploidies (RATs), and copy number variations (CNVs) and parental willingness for invasive prenatal diagnosis in a Chinese prenatal diagnosis center. Methods A total of 24,702 pregnant women were retrospectively analyzed at the Women and Children’s Hospital from January 2013 to April 2019, among which expanded NIPT had been successfully conducted in 24,702 pregnant women. The high-risk expanded NIPT results were validated by karyotype analysis and chromosomal microarray analysis. All the tested pregnant women were followed up for pregnancy outcomes. Results Of the 24,702 cases, successful follow-up was conducted in 98.77% (401/446) of cases with common trisomies and SCAs, 91.95% (80/87) of RAT and CNV cases, and 76.25% (18,429/24,169) of cases with low-risk screening results. The sensitivity of expanded NIPT was 100% (95% confidence interval[CI], 97.38–100%), 96.67%(95%CI, 82.78–99.92%), and 100%(95%CI, 66.37–100.00%), and the specificity was 99.92%(95%CI, 99.87–99.96%), 99.96%(95%CI, 99.91–99.98%), and 99.88% (95%CI, 99.82–99.93%) for the detection of trisomies 21, 18, and 13, respectively. Expanded NIPT detected 45,X, 47,XXX, 47,XXY, XYY syndrome, RATs, and CNVs with positive predictive values of 25.49%, 75%, 94.12%, 76.19%, 6.45%, and 50%, respectively. The women carrying fetuses with Trisomy 21/Trisomy 18/Trisomy 13 underwent invasive prenatal diagnosis and terminated their pregnancies at higher rates than those at high risk for SCAs, RATs, and CNVs. Conclusions Our study demonstrates that the expanded NIPT detects fetal trisomies 21, 18, and 13 with high sensitivity and specificity. The accuracy of detecting SCAs, RATs, and CNVs is still relatively poor and needs to be improved. With a high-risk expanded NIPT result, the women at high risk for common trisomies are more likely to undergo invasive prenatal diagnosis procedures and terminate their pregnancies than those with unusual chromosome abnormalities.


2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 292-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adeeb Khalifeh ◽  
Stuart Weiner ◽  
Vincenzo Berghella ◽  
Alan Donnenfeld

Objective: To examine trends in the incidence and method of invasive prenatal diagnosis due to the impact of sequential screening and noninvasive prenatal testing. Methods: This is a retrospective review of all pregnancies that have undergone invasive prenatal diagnostic testing between June 2002 and June 2014, divided in 3 periods: period 1 from June 2002 to October 2006, period 2 from November 2006 to December 2011, and period 3 from January 2012 to June 2014. The main outcome measures were trends in the incidence and method of each procedure. Results: There were 88,135 deliveries and 6,080 invasive procedures during the study period. In period 1, 2,755 (8.8%) procedures were carried out, in period 2 2,820 (7.3%), and in period 3 505 (2.5%; p < 0.01). In period 1, there were 1,990 (6.3%) cases of amniocentesis, 1,646 (4.3%) in period 2, and 254 (1.2%) in period 3 (p < 0.01). In addition, in 765 (2.5%) cases, chorionic villus sampling (CVS) was performed in period 1, compared to 1,174 (3.0%) cases in period 2 and 251 (1.3%) cases in period 3 (p < 0.01). Advanced maternal age as the sole indication for invasive procedures decreased significantly over time, while the indication of abnormal serum screening and abnormal ultrasound findings increased (p < 0.01). Conclusion: There was a significant decline in the incidence of invasive prenatal testing over the 12 years of the study. The decrease in amniocentesis was more marked than that in CVS.


2014 ◽  
Vol 123 ◽  
pp. 196S-197S ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron L. Turner ◽  
Steve Rad ◽  
Yalda Afshar ◽  
Paola Aghajanian ◽  
John Williams ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunsheng Ge ◽  
Jia Li ◽  
Jianlong Zhuang ◽  
Jian Zhang ◽  
Yanru Huang ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundThe main aims of the study were to investigate the performance of expanded noninvasive prenatal test (expanded NIPT) in screening for common trisomies, sex chromosomal aneuploidies (SCAs), rare autosomal aneuploidies (RATs) and copy number variations (CNVs) and parental willing to taking invasive prenatal diagnosis after expanded NIPT in China.ResultsOf the 24,736 cases, successful follow-up was conducted in 92.2% (411/446) cases. The sensitivity of expanded NIPT test was 98.61%,90.91% and 100% and specificity was 99.91%,99.95% and 99.87% for the detection of trisomies 21, 18 and 13 respectively. Expanded NIPT detected 45, XO, 47, XXX, 47, XXY, XYY syndrome, RATs and CNVs with positive predictive values of 57.39%, 19.61%, 75%, 79.41%, 77.78%, 10% and 56.25% respectively. The women carrying fetuses with T21/T18/T13 underwent invasive prenatal diagnosis and terminated their pregnancies at higher rates than those positive for SCAs, RATs and CNVs.ConclusionsOur study demonstrates that the expanded NIPT detects fetal trisomies 21,18 and 13 with high sensitivity and specificity. The accuracy of detecting SCAs, RATs and CNVs is still relatively poor and needed to be improved. With a positive expanded NIPT result, the women at high risk for common trisomies are more willing to take invasive prenatal diagnosis and terminate their pregnancies.* the first two authors contribute equally to this study.


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
pp. 849-853 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nerida Mansfield ◽  
Tom Boogert ◽  
Andrew McLennan

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 291-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia L. Devers ◽  
Amy Cronister ◽  
Kelly E. Ormond ◽  
Flavia Facio ◽  
Campbell K. Brasington ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
R. J McKinlay Gardner ◽  
David J Amor

Prenatal diagnosis has given medical cytogenetics one of its major areas of application: from amniocentesis in the earliest days to the recent developments of noninvasive prenatal testing based upon a sample of maternal blood. This chapter explores in detail the specific diagnoses that may be made and the decisions, with particular reference to continuation or termination of pregnancy, that face those women/couples for whom a specific diagnosis has been made. The difficulties of decision inherent in a sex chromosome aneuploidy, a microarray-level rearrangement, and in the context of mosaicism are rehearsed. This discussion is offered on the background of a review of the applied embryology.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document