Arab American youth: considerations for mental health and community engagement

Author(s):  
Hanan Hashem ◽  
Ashley Bennett ◽  
Germine H. Awad
2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 277-286
Author(s):  
Nicolás E. Barceló ◽  
Alma Lopez ◽  
Lingqi Tang ◽  
Maria Gabriela Aguilera Nunez ◽  
Felica Jones ◽  
...  

Objective: Racial/ethnic minorities experi­ence disparities in depression1 and there is a paucity of evidence-based interventions to improve depression care access and outcomes. Community Partners in Care (CPIC) is a community-partnered study of depression care quality improvement (QI) in under-resourced, urban communities: Community Engagement and Planning (CEP) for multi-sector coalitions, and Resources for Services (RS) for program technical assistance.2 CEP demonstrated benefits for the overall CPIC study population; effects for Black and Latino sub-populations are unknown.Methods: This sub-analysis examines outcomes for 409 Latino and 488 Black (non-Latino) adults recruited from 90 pro­grams who completed baseline or 6-month follow-up. Regression analyses were used to estimate CEP vs RS intervention effects on primary (Mental Health Related Quality of Life [MHRQL], Patient Health Question­naire-9 [PHQ-9]) and community-priori­tized (mental wellness, physical activity, risk for homelessness) outcomes at 6-months.Results: Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly by intervention in either group. In the adjusted analysis for Black adults, CEP resulted in decreased odds of poor MHRQL (OR: .62, 95% CI=.41- .94, P=.028) with a trend for reducing homelessness risk (OR: .60, .35-1.05, P=.69). For Latino adults, CEP resulted in greater probability of mental wellness (OR: 1.81, 1.05-3.13, P=.034) and a trend for increased physical activity (OR: 1.52, .93- 2.49, P=.091).Conclusions: Exploratory analyses of CEP for depression quality improvement sug­gests significant 6-month benefits in mental health outcomes for Black and Latino participants and trends for improvement in community-prioritized outcomes for both groups. Findings may inform research in multi-sector coalitions to promote equity in depression care. Ethn Dis. 2019;29(2):277- 286; doi:10.18865/ed.29.2.277


2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-187
Author(s):  
Miraj U. Desai ◽  
Chyrell Bellamy ◽  
Kimberly Guy ◽  
Mark Costa ◽  
Maria J. O’Connell ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 711-722
Author(s):  
Jose A. Arriola-Vigo ◽  
Jeffrey G. Stovall ◽  
Troy D. Moon ◽  
Carolyn M. Audet ◽  
Francisco Diez-Canseco

Background: The global burden of mental health conditions has led to the implementation of new models of care for persons with mental illness. Recent mental health reforms in Peru include the implementation of a community mental health model (CMHM) that, among its core objectives, aims to provide care in the community through specialized facilities, the community mental health centers (CMHCs). Community involvement is a key component of this model. This study aims to describe perceptions of community engagement activities in the current model of care in three CMHCs and identify barriers and potential solutions to implementation. Methods: A qualitative research study using in-depth semi-structured interviews with clinicians from three CMHCs and with policy-makers involved in the implementation of the mental health reforms was conducted in two regions of Peru. The interviews, conducted in Spanish, were digitally recorded with consent, transcribed and analyzed using principles of grounded theory applying a framework approach. Community engagement activities are described at different stages of patient care. Results: Twenty-five full-time employees (17 women, 8 men) were interviewed, of which 21 were clinicians (diverse health professions) from CMHCs, and 4 were policy-makers. Interviews elucidated community engagement activities currently being utilized including: (1) employing community mental health workers (CMHWs); (2) home visits; (3) psychosocial clubs; (4) mental health workshops and campaigns; and (5) peer support groups. Inadequate infrastructure and financial resources, lack of knowledge about the CMHM, poorly defined catchment areas, stigma, and inadequate productivity approach were identified as barriers to program implementation. Solutions suggested by participants included increasing knowledge and awareness about mental health and the new model, implementation of peer-training, and improving productivity evaluation and research initiatives. Conclusion: Community engagement activities are being conducted in Peru as part of a new model of care. However, their structure, frequency, and content are perceived by clinicians and policy-makers as highly variable due to a lack of consistent training and resources across CMHCs. Barriers to implementation should be quickly addressed and potential solutions executed, so that scale-up best optimizes the utilization of resources in the implementation process.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document