Because of composite materials’ inherent heterogeneity, the field of micromechanics provides essential tools for understanding and analyzing composite materials and structures. Micromechanics serves two purposes: homogenization or prediction of effective properties and dehomogenization or recovery of local fields in the original heterogeneous microstructure. Many micromechanical tools have been developed and codified, including commercially available software packages that offer micromechanical analyses as stand-alone tools or as part of an analysis chain. With the increasing number of tools available, the practitioner must determine which tool(s) provides the most value for the problem at hand given budget, time, and resource constraints. To date, simple benchmarking examples have been developed in an attempt to address this challenge. The present paper presents the benchmark cases and results from the Micromechanical Simulation Challenge hosted by the Composites Design and Manufacturing HUB. The challenge is a series of comprehensive benchmarking exercises in the field of micromechanics against which such tools can be compared. The Level I challenge problems consist of six microstructure cases, including aligned, continuous fibers in a matrix, with and without an interphase; a cross-ply laminate; spherical inclusions; a plain-weave fabric; and a short-fiber microstructure with “random” fiber orientation. In the present phase of the simulation challenge, the material constitutive relations are restricted to linear thermoelastic. Partial results from DIGIMAT-MF, ESI VPS, MAC/GMC, finite volume direct averaging method, Altair MDS, SwiftComp, and 3D finite element analysis are reported. As the challenge is intended to be ongoing, the full results are hosted and updated online at www.cdmHUB.org .
The causal differential scattering approach to calculating the effective properties of random composite materials with a particle size distribution
