Essex-Lopresti Injuries

Author(s):  
Bassem T. Elhassan ◽  
Andrew T. Assenmacher
Keyword(s):  
2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 861-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron I. Venouziou ◽  
Loukia K. Papatheodorou ◽  
Robert W. Weiser ◽  
Dean G. Sotereanos

1988 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 450-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
E HARGADON ◽  
M PORTER
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Kathryne J. Stabile ◽  
Matthew M. Tomaino
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Michael O’Keeffe ◽  
Kiran Khursid ◽  
Peter L. Munk ◽  
Mihra S. Taljanovic

Chapter 15 discusses radius and ulna trauma. Forearm fractures are common and may be isolated to the ulna or more commonly involve both bones. Fractures of the radius or ulna are usually because of direct trauma and are often displaced. Depending on their complexity, isolated fractures of the ulnar diaphysis may be treated nonoperatively or operatively whereas both bone (radius and ulna) diaphyseal fractures are typically treated operatively. Galeazzi fracture-dislocations are comprised of radial diaphyseal fractures in association with distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) dislocation/subluxation. Monteggia fracture-dislocations are comprised of a proximal ulnar fracture in association with radial head dislocation. In type IV Monteggia injuries, there is an additional fracture of the proximal radial diaphysis. Essex-Lopresti fracture-dislocations include radial head fractures in association with DRUJ dislocation/subluxation.


1988 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 450-452
Author(s):  
E. J. HARGADON ◽  
M. L. PORTER

The Essex-Lopresti fracture-dislocation consists of a radial head fracture associated with dislocation of the inferior radio-ulnar joint. We report a variation of this injury in which there was an additional fracture through the scaphoid.


Author(s):  
Kevin Little ◽  
Philip To ◽  
Reid Draeger
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (01) ◽  
pp. 47-55
Author(s):  
Svenna H. W. L. Verhiel ◽  
Sezai Özkan ◽  
Christopher G. Langhammer ◽  
Neal C. Chen

Abstract Objective The main aim of this article is to report 10-year outcomes after Essex-Lopresti injury (ELI). Study Design Retrospective case series. Two level I trauma centers and one associated community hospital from 2003 to 2016. Patients Sixteen patients who sustained an ELI and were treated at one of our three regional hospitals. Intervention Initially, 4 patients (25%) were treated nonoperatively by immobilization and 12 patients (75%) were treated operatively. Proximal surgery included radial head open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), radial head arthroplasty, radial head excision and forearm ORIF, and wound debridement. Ten patients (63%) were acutely identified with longitudinal forearm instability. Of these, four patients had the distal radioulnar joint pinned. In the other six patients, the forearm was immobilized. Overall, 16 patients underwent a total of 32 revision surgeries. Main Outcome Measure Performance of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity (PROMIS UE) Physical score, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score for pain-severity, and NRS score for satisfaction of overall outcome. Results Follow-up for outcome evaluation was available for 10 patients, at a median of 10 (interquartile range [IQR]: 8.0–12) years after date of injury. The median PROMIS UE Physical score was 36 (IQR: 33–38). Median NRS score for pain-severity on average was 5 (IQR: 0–6). The median NRS score for satisfaction of overall outcome was 7 (IQR: 5–8). Conclusion Patients who sustain an ELI generally have substantial deficits of upper extremity function as measured by PROMIS UE. Early radial head arthroplasty may be beneficial, but further study in a larger cohort is needed. Outcomes of nonoperative treatment and operative treatment were similar and suggest that current surgical treatments are incomplete.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document