Surgical stabilization of traumatic elbow joint luxation and proximal ulnar fracture in a silvery langur (Trachypithecus cristatus)

CASE DESCRIPTION A 3-year-old 5-kg sexually intact female silvery langur housed in a single-species group at a zoological institution was presented because of acute trauma to the left forelimb. CLINICAL FINDINGS Radiography of the left forelimb revealed a type II Monteggia fracture (proximal ulnar fracture with cranial displacement and caudal luxation of the radial head). During surgery, disruption of the annular ligament and rupture of the lateral collateral ligament were noted. TREATMENT AND OUTCOME The langur underwent open reduction and internal fixation of the ulnar fracture and placement of a radioulnar positional screw, a prosthetic lateral collateral ligament, and a temporary hinged type 1A external skeletal fixator. The langur was returned to group housing, underwent behavioral training, and was periodically anesthetized for physical therapy sessions to improve range of motion of the left elbow joint. The external skeletal fixator was removed 4 weeks after surgery, and the radioulnar positional screw was removed 6 weeks after surgery. Three months after surgery, the range of motion of the langur’s left elbow joint was considered normal, and the animal returned to normal activity. CLINICAL RELEVANCE For the captive silvery langur of the present report, surgical stabilization and postoperative management of a type II Monteggia fracture of the left forelimb were successful with recovery of elbow joint function. These techniques may be applied to other captive nonhuman primates, including those that brachiate or are members of social species that must be housed with conspecifics in the postoperative period to maintain group dynamics.

CHARACTERISTICS OF FOREARM RE-FRACTURE IN YOUTH ATHLETES

Background: The forearm is the most common site of fracture, and perhaps re-fracture, in the pediatric population. Although both bone forearm (BBFA) fractures represent approximately 30% of pediatric upper extremity fractures, little is known about BBFA re-fractures, particularly among youth athletes. Purpose: To evaluate characteristics of BBFA re-fracture and recurrent fractures. Methods: An IRB-approved retrospective chart review based on CPT and ICD-9/10 codes of forearm fractures (ages 10-18 years) treated by a single academic pediatric orthopedic group from June 2009 to May 2020 was conducted. All BBFA, radial, or ulnar fractures with ipsilateral same-site, or non-identical ipsilateral or contralateral forearm fracture were included. Demographics, injury characteristics, length of immobilization, timing of return to activity, and radiographic data (angulation, distance between radius fracture and ulna fracture [in mm], position of fracture within bone, and radiographic healing). An analysis was performed to evaluate associations of ipsilateral same-site re-fracture versus ipsilateral or contra-lateral non-identical site fractures. Results: Twenty-nine of 686 BBFA and distal radius fractures were identified to have recurrent fracture (4.23%), with an average age of 11.5 years and male-to-female ratio of 6.25:1. 67% of ipsilateral same-site re-fractures occurred within one year. The most common mechanisms of primary fracture were contact sports (40%) and tumbling (30%), and re-fracture occurred 182 days after original fracture. 52% percent of recurrent fractures were ipsilateral same-site re-fractures, while 48% occurred in a non-identical site, either ipsilaterally or contralaterally. The most common mechanisms of recurrent fracture were contact sports (38%), falls (38%), and tumbling (14%). Ipsilateral same-site re-fractures compared to other recurrent fractures, were significantly associated with a mid-shaft location (p=0.0029), increased radius to ulna fracture distance (21.14 mm versus 11.3 mm, p=0.0277) [Figure 1], and earlier occurrence following index fracture (re-fracture= 397.33 days versus non-identical recurrent fracture= 884.07 days, p=0.0056). Degree of angulation was not significantly associated with re-fracture. Conclusion: Recurrent fracture may occur at different times and locations following primary injury treatment. Ipsilateral same-site re-fractures tend to occur within the first year of treatment following mid-shaft fractures incurred during contact sports and tumbling, with widely spaced radial and ulnar fracture sites. Further research may be warranted to evaluate biologic, bone health, or personality traits that may lead to recurrent and re-fractures in pediatric forearm fractures. [Figure: see text]

Outcomes using the Ilizarov external mini-fixator for Monteggia fractures in children

Objective To evaluate the use of Ilizarov external mini-fixation in the treatment of Monteggia fractures (dislocation of the radial head with an associated fracture of the proximal ulna) in children. Methods Children with proximal ulnar fracture were included and underwent fracture reduction surgery with Ilizarov external mini-fixators, followed by immobilization of the supinated forearm with plaster. The reduction was evaluated intra-operatively using arthrography. Mackay criteria were used to evaluate clinical outcomes at follow-up. Results A total of 15 children were included in the study. Mackay efficacy was 100 %, indicating excellent outcomes using the Ilizarov external mini-fixator. Conclusion Use of the Ilizarov external mini–fixator is particularly suitable in the treatment of children with comminuted and compression fractures of proximal ulna. It is easy to operate, low invasive and is worthy of promotion.

Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing for Proximal Monteggia Fractures in Children

IntroductionMonteggia fractures are defined as fractures of the ulna’s proximal third with associated dislocation of the radial head and were further described and classified by Bado. They are very rare in adults and even rare in children reaching an incidence of 1.5 - 3% of all pediatric forearm fractures. The treatment’s primary goal is the anatomical reduction of the ulnar fracture, and with that, the following indirect anatomic reduction of the radial head. Different modalities for the treatment of Monteggia fractures in children are reported.We present possible closed reduction techniques and internal fixation based on the type of Bado classification in pediatric patients. We illustrate these techniques as a case series discussing the strengths, risks, and pitfalls of the ulna’s retrograde nailing.Materials and MethodsFor this case series, we included all pediatric patients who got surgical treatment at our institution for a Monteggia lesion from November 2000 to August 2019. Preoperative imaging consisted of conventional radiographs of the elbow and the forearm in two planes. Results This case series reports about six pediatric cases (age two to six years, two girls and four boys). They all had a proximal Monteggia fracture. In all cases, closed indirect reduction of the ulnar fracture and reposition of the radial head was achieved utilizing retrograde nailing of the ulna employing an intramedullary nail or Kirschner-Wire according to the instructions. No infection, vascular or nerve injuries, or other complications occurred. All were pain-free and regained full range of motion compared to the contralateral side.ConclusionIndirect reduction and intramedullary retrograde nailing are minimally invasive techniques that do not harm the blood supply to the bone and soft tissues. It may be a safe and effective procedure.

A Case of Teriparatide Use in Nonunion Atypical Ulnar Fracture

Background: Atypical upper limb fracture is a rare complication of bisphosphonate use. The management of nonunion fractures is challenging, especially in patients who are not surgical candidates. Teriparatide, a novel anabolic drug for osteoporosis has been increasingly used off-label for treatment of nonunion fractures and bisphosphonate related atypical fractures of the lower extremity. The proposed mechanism of healing is by enhancement of callus formation and mechanical strength. Clinical Case: A 72 year-old woman with a history of bilateral lower extremity paralysis and bilateral upper extremity paresis, who mobilized short distances with Canadian crutches, had been treated for 15 years with alendronate, for osteopenia associated with multiple risk factors for osteoporosis. 11 months before referral, and a month after alendronate was discontinued, she sustained a muscle-spasm induced fracture of the mid-shaft of the right ulna. She was treated nonoperatively due to chronic osteomyelitis with recurrent bacteremia from a prior non-healing left ulnar fracture (with internal fixation). Bone density of the right forearm had been normal. Since the right ulna break was transverse with minimal comminution, located in the diaphysis, occurred after trivial force and exhibited delayed healing, it was thought to be an atypical fracture secondary to bisphosphonates. She was initiated on cyclical teriparatide injection 20 mcg subcutaneously daily, with 2 months on and 2 weeks off. In one year, patient responded with dramatic radiographic improvement by forming a large callus with almost complete healing of the fracture. Conclusion: Mid-forearm atypical fracture from long-term bisphosphonate use is rare and is at risk for nonunion. The management of atypical upper limb nonunion fracture in nonoperative patients is not well established. Case reports exist of patients with atypical upper limb fracture who are either treated conservatively, or surgically with fixation/bone grafting +/- teriparatide. Our case showed that teriparatide, when used cyclically, exerted positive osteogenic effect and improved healing of the nonunion of an atypical fracture of forearm in a patient who continued weight bearing activity on her only functional limb.