Community reentry

2021 ◽  
pp. 294-298.e2
Author(s):  
Eric T. Spier
Keyword(s):  
1988 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 420-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane Dobner ◽  
Margaret Mitani
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-171
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Barnert ◽  
Ava Sun ◽  
Laura Abrams ◽  
Paul J Chung

BackgroundYouth involved in the juvenile justice system have high reproductive health needs and, on exiting detention, face the challenging transition of reentry. We conducted a systematic literature review to describe what is known about youths’ reproductive health needs during community reentry after incarceration.MethodsWe searched PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar for articles containing key words with the concepts ‘child or adolescent’, ‘incarcerated’ and 'reentry'. In the search, we defined the concept of ‘reentry’ as within 1 month prior to release (to include interventions involving pre-release planning) and up to 18 months after release from incarceration.ResultsOur search yielded 2187 articles. After applying all exclusion criteria, 14 articles on reproductive health remained for extraction. The articles provided data on the following aspects of youths’ reproductive health: frequency of condom use (eight articles), sexual risk behaviours other than lack of condom use (seven articles), and prevalence of sexually transmitted infections (three articles).ConclusionsThe literature on the reproductive health needs of youth undergoing reentry is extremely limited. Current intervention studies yield mixed but promising results and more intervention studies that address both pre-release reentry planning and the post-incarceration period are needed. Given incarcerated youths’ well-documented reproductive health disparities compared with non-incarcerated adolescents, the identified gaps represent important opportunities for future research and programmatic emphasis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 437-456
Author(s):  
Dave Sells ◽  
Anderson Curtis ◽  
Jehan Abdur-Raheem ◽  
Michele Klimczak ◽  
Charles Barber ◽  
...  

Most people released from incarceration in the criminal justice system return to prison within 3 years. To improve community reentry, national initiatives have promoted new and revitalized programming, including peer mentorship, though this approach remains largely unstudied. Fifty-five men participated within a pilot randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of peer mentorship upon recidivism. Hierarchical binary logistic regression including recidivism risk, as well as group assignment to either a standard services for community reentry condition or standard services plus peer mentorship condition, showed that those receiving mentorship had significantly lower recidivism. It appears that peer mentorship with a model focus upon early intervention, relationship quality, criminal desistance, social navigation, and gainful citizenship may promote the complex task of early community reentry. Given this pilot’s small sample, future research should confirm this association on a larger scale, enabling longitudinal and treatment component analyses examining the relative contributions of mentorship model factors.


1989 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 50-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danese D. Malkmus
Keyword(s):  

1983 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 303-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edwin L. Rabiner ◽  
Carl F. Wells ◽  
Elmer Struening ◽  
James Schmeidler

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document