Check that neck: Cervical spine imaging

2022 ◽  
pp. 214-217
Author(s):  
Anna Schlechter ◽  
Bhairav Patel
Keyword(s):  
1990 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald L. Kreipke ◽  
Douglas I. Silver ◽  
Robert D. Tarver ◽  
Ethan M. Braunstein

2021 ◽  
pp. emermed-2021-211288
Author(s):  
J Scott Delaney ◽  
Ammar Al-Kashmiri ◽  
Abdulaziz Alalshaikh ◽  
Saif Al-Ghafri ◽  
Sanjeet Singh Saluja ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe Canadian C-Spine Rule (CCR) and the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) criteria are two commonly used clinical decision rules which use midline cervical spine (c-spine) tenderness on palpation as an indication for c-spine imaging post-trauma. This study was undertaken to determine the prevalence and location of midline c-spine tenderness in the non-trauma population.MethodsWe prospectively evaluated consenting adult patients presenting to an urban ED or university sport medicine clinic in Montreal, Canada between 2018 and 2020 for atraumatic non-head and neck-related reports over a 20-month period. The presence and location of pain during midline c-spine palpation as assessed by two examiners during separate evaluations was recorded. Patient information such as age, neck length and circumference, gender, body mass index (BMI) and scaphoid tenderness was also collected.ResultsOf 478 patients enrolled, 286 (59.8%) had midline c-spine tenderness on palpation with both examiners. The majority of those with tenderness were female (70.6%). When examining all patients, tenderness was present in the upper third of the c-spine in 128 (26.8%) patients, middle third in 270 (56.5%) patients and lower third in 6 (1.3%) patients. Factors associated with having increased odds of midline c-spine tenderness on palpation included a lower BMI and the presence of scaphoid tenderness on palpation.ConclusionsThere is a high prevalence of c-spine tenderness on palpation in patients who have not undergone head or neck trauma. This finding may help explain the low specificity in some of the validation studies examining the CCR and the NEXUS criteria.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Roxanne Massoumi ◽  
Joseph Wertz ◽  
Tuyen Duong ◽  
Chi-hon Tseng ◽  
Howard Chung-Hao Jen

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
pp. 84-88
Author(s):  
Joseph Chaudry ◽  
Nisha Swaminathan ◽  
Ruth K. Gershon ◽  
David P. Gordy ◽  
Lindsey Allred ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Christopher L. Chong ◽  
Drue N. Ware ◽  
John H. Harris

2001 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 295-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuka Kobayashi ◽  
J. Mochida ◽  
Ikuo Saito ◽  
Sizuka Matui ◽  
Eiren Toh

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 816-821 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne Baerg ◽  
Arul Thirumoorthi ◽  
Rosemary Vannix ◽  
Asma Taha ◽  
Amy Young ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Christoph I. Lee

This chapter, found in the back pain section of the book, provides a succinct synopsis of a key study examining the use of cervical spine imaging in blunt trauma patients. This summary outlines the study methodology and design, major results, limitations and criticisms, related studies and additional information, and clinical implications. The study presents a set of five diagnostic criteria that approach 100% sensitivity for identifying clinically important cervical spine injuries and could eliminate one-eighth of all cervical spine radiographs ordered for these patients. In addition to outlining the most salient features of the study, a clinical vignette and imaging example are included in order to provide relevant clinical context.


Cureus ◽  
2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atman Desai ◽  
Arjun V Pendharkar ◽  
Jessica G Swienckowski ◽  
Perry A Ball ◽  
Scott Lollis ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document