versus film
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

75
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

16
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 2082 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Goncalves ◽  
Myungkoo Kang ◽  
Byoung-Uk Sohn ◽  
Gufan Yin ◽  
Juejun Hu ◽  
...  

Broadband supercontinuum (SC) generation requires host material attributes defined by both optical and physical properties and the material’s manufacturability. We review and define the trade-offs in these attributes as applied to fiber or planar film applications based on homogeneous glass property data, and provide a series of examples of how one might optimize such attributes through material compositional and morphology design. As an example, we highlight the role of varying composition, microstructure, and linear/nonlinear optical properties, such as transmittance, refractive index, and the multiphoton absorption coefficient, for a series of novel multicomponent chalcogenide glasses within a model GeSe2-As2Se3-PbSe (GAP-Se) system. We report key optical property variation as a function of composition and form, and discuss how such glasses, suitable for both fiber and planar film processing, could lend themselves as candidates for use in SC generation. We demonstrate the impact of starting glass composition and morphology and illustrate how tailoring composition and form (bulk versus film) leads to significant variation in linear, nonlinear, and dispersive optical property behavior within this system that enables design options that are attractive to optimization of desirable SC performance, based on optical composites.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Kennedy ◽  
Stacey M. Baxter ◽  
Jasmina Ilicic
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Farber ◽  
Katy Bell ◽  
Nehmat Houssami ◽  
Kevin McGeechan ◽  
Sally Wortley ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 364-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simrenjeet Sandhu ◽  
Chris Rudnisky ◽  
Sourabh Arora ◽  
Faazil Kassam ◽  
Gordon Douglas ◽  
...  

SynopsisClinicians can feel confident compressed three-dimensional digital (3DD) and two-dimensional digital (2DD) imaging evaluating important features of glaucomatous disc damage is comparable to the previous gold standard of stereoscopic slide film photography, supporting the use of digital imaging for teleglaucoma applications.Background/aimsTo compare the sensitivity and specificity of 3DD and 2DD photography with stereo slide film in detecting glaucomatous optic nerve head features.MethodsThis prospective, multireader validation study imaged and compressed glaucomatous, suspicious or normal optic nerves using a ratio of 16:1 into 3DD and 2DD (1024×1280 pixels) and compared both to stereo slide film. The primary outcome was vertical cup-to-disc ratio (VCDR) and secondary outcomes, including disc haemorrhage and notching, were also evaluated. Each format was graded randomly by four glaucoma specialists. A protocol was implemented for harmonising data including consensus-based interpretation as needed.ResultsThere were 192 eyes imaged with each format. The mean VCDR for slide, 3DD and 2DD was 0.59±0.20, 0.60±0.18 and 0.62±0.17, respectively. The agreement of VCDR for 3DD versus film was κ=0.781 and for 2DD versus film was κ=0.69. Sensitivity (95.2%), specificity (95.2%) and area under the curve (AUC; 0.953) of 3DD imaging to detect notching were better (p=0.03) than for 2DD (90.5%; 88.6%; AUC=0.895). Similarly, sensitivity (77.8%), specificity (98.9%) and AUC (0.883) of 3DD to detect disc haemorrhage were better (p=0.049) than for 2DD (44.4%; 99.5%; AUC=0.72). There was no difference between 3DD and 2DD imaging in detecting disc tilt (p=0.7), peripapillary atrophy (p=0.16), grey crescent (p=0.1) or pallor (p=0.43), although 3D detected sloping better (p=0.013).ConclusionsBoth 3DD and 2DD imaging demonstrates excellent reproducibility in comparison to stereo slide film with experts evaluating VCDR, notching and disc haemorrhage. 3DD in this study was slightly more accurate than 2DD for evaluating disc haemorrhage, notching and sloping.


2015 ◽  
Vol 205 (3) ◽  
pp. 676-684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise M. Henderson ◽  
Diana L. Miglioretti ◽  
Karla Kerlikowske ◽  
Karen J. Wernli ◽  
Brian L. Sprague ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document