Rasch Measurement Models

Author(s):  
B.D. Wright
2017 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 87-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tine Nielsen ◽  
Guido Makransky ◽  
Maria Louison Vang ◽  
Jesper Dammeyer

2008 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 458-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig A. Velozo ◽  
Ying Wang ◽  
Leigh Lehman ◽  
Jia-Hwa Wang

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 243-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Skye P. Barbic ◽  
Stefan J. Cano

SummaryThis commentary argues the importance of robust, meaningful assessment of clinical and functional outcomes in psychiatry. Outcome assessments should be fit for the purpose of measuring relevant concepts of interest in specific clinical settings. As well, the measurement model selected to develop and test assessments can be critical for guiding care. Three types of measurement models are presented: classical test theory, item response theory, and Rasch measurement theory. To optimise current diagnostic and treatment practices in psychiatry, careful consideration of these models is warranted.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sasha A. Fleary ◽  
Karen M. Freund ◽  
Claudio Nigg

Abstract BackgroundHealth literacy (HL) is implicated in improved health decision-making and health promotion, and reduced racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic health disparities. Three major areas of HL include functional, interactive, and critical HL. HL skills develop throughout the lifespan as individuals’ psychosocial and cognitive capacities develop and as they accumulate experiences with navigating health systems. Though adolescence is marked by increased involvement in health decision-making, most HL studies and measures of HL have focused on adults. Both the adult and adolescent HL literature are also limited by the paucity of validated test-based measures for assessing HL. The existing test-based validated HL measures for adolescents were originally designed for adults. However, adolescents are at an earlier phase of developing their HL skills (e.g., fewer experiences navigating the health system) compared to adults and measures originally designed for adults may assume prior knowledge that adolescents may lack therein underestimating adolescents’ HL. This study developed and validated test-based assessments of adolescents’ functional, interactive, and critical HL.MethodsItems were generated in an iterative process: focus groups with adolescents to inform item content, cognitive interviews with adolescents and expert consultation established content and face validity of the initial items, items were revised or removed where indicated. High school students (n=355) completed a measurement battery including the revised HL items. The items were evaluated and validated using Rasch measurement models. ResultsThe final 6-item functional, 10-item interactive, and 7-item critical HL assessments and their composite (23 items) fit their respective Rasch models. Item-level invariance was established for gender (male vs. female), age (12-15-year-olds vs. 16-18-year-olds), and ethnicity in all assessments. The assessments had good convergent validity with an established measure of functional HL and scores on the assessments were positively related to reading instructions before taking medicine and questioning the truthfulness of information found online. ConclusionsThese assessments are the first test-based measures of adolescents’ interactive and critical HL, the first test-based measure of functional HL designed for adolescents, and first composite test-based assessment of all three major areas of HL. These assessments should be used to inform strategies for improving adolescents’ HL, decision-making, and behaviors.


2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Hamme Peterson ◽  
Karen L. Gischlar ◽  
N. Andrew Peterson

Diagnostica ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Eckes

Zusammenfassung. Leistungsbeurteilungen unterliegen einer Reihe von Urteilsfehlern, die ihre Genauigkeit und Validität erheblich mindern können. Ein besonders kritischer Urteilsfehler ist die Tendenz zur Strenge bzw. Milde. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wird mit der Multifacetten-Rasch-Analyse (“many-facet Rasch measurement“; Linacre, 1989 ; Linacre & Wright, 2002 ) ein Item-Response-Modell vorgestellt, das Messungen der Strenge bzw. Milde eines jeden Beurteilers erlaubt und die ermittelten Strengemaße zusammen mit den Fähigkeitsmaßen der beurteilten Personen und den Schwierigkeitsmaßen der Aufgaben oder Beurteilungskriterien in einen gemeinsamen Bezugsrahmen stellt. Das Modell ermöglicht ferner eine um die Strenge der Beurteiler korrigierte Leistungsmessung. Mittels dieses Ansatzes werden im Rahmen des “Test Deutsch als Fremdsprache“ (TestDaF) Beurteilungen analysiert, die je 2 von insgesamt 29 Beurteilern zu Leistungen von 1359 Pbn im schriftlichen Ausdruck nach 3 Kriterien abgegeben haben. Die Gruppe der Beurteiler erweist sich als sehr heterogen, so dass eine Strengekorrektur der Urteile geboten ist. Abschließend werden verschiedene Implikationen des Multifacetten-Rasch-Modells für die Evaluation von Leistungsbeurteilungen diskutiert.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document