A hierarchical bayesian peak over threshold approach for conflict-based before-after safety evaluation of leading pedestrian intervals

2020 ◽  
Vol 147 ◽  
pp. 105772
Author(s):  
Yanyong Guo ◽  
Tarek Sayed ◽  
Lai Zheng
Author(s):  
Lai Zheng ◽  
Tarek Sayed

Traffic conflict techniques have drawn considerable research interest and a number of conflict indicators have been developed. Previous studies have qualitatively analyzed indicator differences from their definitions and empirically investigated their similarities based on identified traffic conflicts. This study compares conflict indicators from a validity perspective by comparing crashes estimated from conflict indicators with observed crashes. The peak over threshold (POT) approach was employed for crash estimation. Four commonly used indicators are compared: time to collision (TTC), modified time to collision (MTTC), post encroachment time (PET), and deceleration to avoid a crash (DRAC). Based on the conflict and crash data collected from three signalized intersections, POT models are developed for different thresholds in the appropriate ranges, and crash estimation methods were proposed for individual conflict indicators. The identified conflicts and estimated crashes associated with different indicators are then compared. The results show that traffic conflicts identified by the four indicators vary, with MTTC generating the most accurate crash estimates. The crash estimates from TTC and PET are also reasonable but there is a tendency of overestimation for TTC and underestimation for PET. The crash estimates of DRAC are all outside the confidence intervals of observed crashes, which is likely related to the uncertainty of vehicle braking capacity.


Author(s):  
Kjersti Bruserud ◽  
Sverre Haver

In lack of simultaneous data of metocean parameters such as wind, waves and currents, Norwegian design regulations presently recommend a conservative combination of metocean parameters for estimation of characteristic metocean loads on offshore structures. A simplified parametric load model for a jacket, based on waves and currents, is assumed. Several approaches to load estimation are investigated and the following are considered; different averaging length of extreme currents, the effect of peak-over-threshold approach for estimation of extreme wave and currents compared to all-sea states approach and extreme load estimation directly from a load time series. When compared to the recommended approach, all other approaches yield a reduced estimated characteristic metocean load. The results are intended be illustrative and not suitable for use in design.


Author(s):  
Kjersti Bruserud ◽  
Sverre Haver

In lack of simultaneous data of metocean parameters such as wind, waves, and currents, Norwegian design regulations presently recommend a conservative combination of metocean parameters for estimation of characteristic metocean loads on offshore structures. A simplified parametric load model for a jacket, based on waves and currents, is assumed. Several approaches to load estimation are investigated and the following are considered: different averaging length of extreme currents, the effect of peak-over-threshold approach for estimation of extreme wave and currents compared to all-sea states approach and extreme load estimation directly from a load time series. When compared to the recommended approach, all other approaches yield a reduced estimated characteristic metocean load. The purpose of this study is to indicate the possible conservatism in the Norwegian design regulations for estimation of quasi-static loads on a jacket. The results are intended to be illustrative and not suitable for use in specific design calculations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document