Pediatric Resident Attitudes and Practice Regarding Advocacy Pre- and Post-Implementation of an Innovative Advocacy Curriculum (Research Abstract)

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. e51
Author(s):  
Yonit Lax ◽  
Milani Patel ◽  
Sandra Braganza
2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 154-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Pham ◽  
Michael Spaulding-Barclay ◽  
Ashley Sherman

INTRODUCTION: Billing and coding (B&C) are important aspects of medical practice that many feel are taught inadequately during residency. In addressing this deficiency, residency programs must determine when and how to teach B&C. Some programs teach through informal methods or direct their education only towards senior residents and/or certain career paths. Is this approach ideal? This study evaluated pediatric resident attitudes towards formal B&C education, by post graduate year (PGY), and career plans. METHODS: A survey was distributed to residents before and after implementation of a novel, formal curriculum teaching B&C. General linear models were calculated to look at differences over time of all residents and by PGY levels and future career plans. RESULTS: Among all residents, there was no change in the highly positive attitudes towards Learning is Important, Valuable Use of Time, or Want a Formal Curriculum. Perceived Knowledge increased significantly and Need to Know More decreased significantly. There were no differences between PGY levels or career plans with all years valuing and wanting education. PGY-3s scored higher than PGY-1s and PGY-2s with Perceived Knowledge. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a strong, equal amount of interest in the formal education of B&C across all residents, regardless of training year and/or career plans. Pediatric residencies should consider implementing formal education on B&C to all residents. Pediatric resident attitudes towards billing and coding education can be used to guide the curriculum.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. e42
Author(s):  
Hemangini C. Bhakta ◽  
Suet K. Lam ◽  
Suzanne C. Rusnak ◽  
Ross Myers ◽  
Keith Ponitz ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 89 (9) ◽  
pp. 765-771 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey D. Edwards ◽  
Emily J. Davidson ◽  
Amy J. Houtrow ◽  
Robert J. Graham

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 2333794X1989412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nora Pfaff ◽  
Chelsea Garnett ◽  
Alexandra J. Mihalek ◽  
Mary Rose Mamey ◽  
Susan Wu

Over a decade after its debut, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine coverage remains suboptimal. The inpatient setting presents a largely unexplored opportunity to increase vaccination rates. This study aims to describe pediatric resident attitudes toward inpatient immunization and compare differences by vaccine, in particular HPV. An anonymous survey of beliefs and practices regarding inpatient vaccines was distributed to pediatric resident physicians at a single freestanding urban children’s hospital in September 2017. A total of 58 surveys were collected (64% response rate). We found that pediatric residents were more likely to report that they never or rarely discuss the HPV vaccine during hospitalization compared with the primary childhood series ( P = .001), Tdap ( P = .02), and the influenza vaccine ( P < .001), and rarely offer the HPV vaccine during hospitalization compared with childhood vaccines ( P = .003) and influenza ( P = .001). This suggests that provider hesitancy still exists for the HPV vaccine, presenting opportunities for further education and inpatient interventions.


Cureus ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Liu ◽  
Suzanne Reed ◽  
John D Mahan ◽  
Rebecca Wallihan

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 127 (6) ◽  
pp. peds.2010-2350d-peds.2010-2350d

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document