Proceedings of the 2006 Meeting of the Society of Chairmen of Academic Radiology Departments

2006 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 1302
Author(s):  
Stephen R. Baker
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 663-668
Author(s):  
Karen A. Buch ◽  
Dania Daye ◽  
Monica J. Wood ◽  
Carmen Alvarez ◽  
Marcela G. del Carmen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (03) ◽  
pp. 323-330
Author(s):  
Timea Hebar ◽  
Žiga Snoj ◽  
Luca Maria Sconfienza ◽  
Filip Maria H.M. Vanhoenacker ◽  
Maryam Shahabpour ◽  
...  

No official data exist on the status of musculoskeletal (MSK) radiology in Europe. The Committee for National Societies conducted an international survey to understand the status of training, subspecialization, and local practice among the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) partner societies. This article reports the results of that survey. An online questionnaire was distributed to all 26 European national associations that act as official partner societies of the ESSR. The 24 questions were subdivided into six sections: society structure, relationship with the national radiological society, subspecialization, present radiology practice, MSK interventional procedures, and MSK ultrasound. The findings of our study show a lack of standardized training and/or accreditation methods in the field of MSK radiology at a national level. The European diploma in musculoskeletal radiology is directed to partly overcome this problem; however, this certification is still underrecognized. Using certification methods, a more homogeneous European landscape could be created in the future with a view to subspecialist training. MSK ultrasound and MSK interventional procedures should be performed by a health professional with a solid knowledge of the relevant imaging modalities and sufficient training in MSK radiology. Recognition of MSK radiology as an official subspecialty would make the field more attractive for younger colleagues as well as attracting the brightest and best, an important key to further development of both clinical and academic radiology. Key Points


2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 754-756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica B. Robbins ◽  
Katherine A. Klein ◽  
Priscilla J. Slanetz

2016 ◽  
Vol 206 (4) ◽  
pp. 678-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars J. Grimm ◽  
Jennifer Ngo ◽  
Etta D. Pisano ◽  
Sora Yoon

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 255-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moritz F. Kircher ◽  
Andrew Hines-Peralta ◽  
Phillip M. Boiselle ◽  
Kevin Donohoe ◽  
Bettina Siewert

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 919-932 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Lamar ◽  
Michael L. Richardson ◽  
Blake Carlson
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Nosaiba Al-Ryalat ◽  
Lna Malkawi ◽  
Saif Aldeen AlRyalat

Background: Since the emergence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), several journals established dedicated resource center for all articles published on COVID-19. Our study compared the altmetric impact captured by articles published in journals having such COVID-19 resource center. Methods: We used Web of Science database to assess radiology journals publishing most common articles on COVID-19. We used Dimensions database to assess citations received and altmetric attention score for each article. For each article, we extracted number of citation received and altmetric attention score. To account for the the variation in strength and exposure between included journals, we adopted a normalization strategy and we used regression analysis in our statistical analysis. Results: A total of 494 articles included in the current assessment, including 334 (67.6%) articles published in journals with dedicated COVID-19 resource center including European radiology, American Journal of Roentgenology, Radiology, and Journal of the American college of radiology, while European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Academic Radiology did not have COVID-19 resource center. Journals with COVID-19 resource center had a mean normalized altmetric attention score of 0.38 higher (95% CI 0.25 to 0.50; p< 0.001) and a mean normalized citation count of 6.73 higher (95% CI 3.99 to 9.48; p< 0.001) than those without COVID-19 resource center. Conclusion: Radiology journals that provided COVID-19 articles in a dedicated resource center within its homepage had higher attention and citation for their COVID-19 articles compared to journals that did not have such dedicated resource center.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document