scholarly journals Role of grain size on the martensitic transformation and ultra-fast superelasticity in shape memory alloys

2015 ◽  
Vol 95 ◽  
pp. 37-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith R. Morrison ◽  
Mathew J. Cherukara ◽  
Hojin Kim ◽  
Alejandro Strachan
2012 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 459-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Sánchez-Alarcos ◽  
V. Recarte ◽  
J.I. Pérez-Landazábal ◽  
C. Gómez-Polo ◽  
J.A. Rodríguez-Velamazán

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 105004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakub Mikula ◽  
Siu Sin Quek ◽  
Shailendra P Joshi ◽  
David T Wu ◽  
Rajeev Ahluwalia

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. S743-S746 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.M. La Roca ◽  
L.M. Isola ◽  
C.E. Sobrero ◽  
Ph. Vermaut ◽  
J. Malarría

1995 ◽  
Vol 05 (C8) ◽  
pp. C8-973-C8-978
Author(s):  
M. Jurado ◽  
Ll. Mañosa ◽  
A. González-Comas ◽  
C. Stassis ◽  
A. Planes

Author(s):  
A. Bauer ◽  
M. Vollmer ◽  
T. Niendorf

AbstractIn situ tensile tests employing digital image correlation were conducted to study the martensitic transformation of oligocrystalline Fe–Mn–Al–Ni shape memory alloys in depth. The influence of different grain orientations, i.e., near-〈001〉 and near-〈101〉, as well as the influence of different grain boundary misorientations are in focus of the present work. The results reveal that the reversibility of the martensite strongly depends on the type of martensitic evolving, i.e., twinned or detwinned. Furthermore, it is shown that grain boundaries lead to stress concentrations and, thus, to formation of unfavored martensite variants. Moreover, some martensite plates seem to penetrate the grain boundaries resulting in a high degree of irreversibility in this area. However, after a stable microstructural configuration is established in direct vicinity of the grain boundary, the transformation begins inside the neighboring grains eventually leading to a sequential transformation of all grains involved.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document