scholarly journals Recognizing biased reasoning: Conflict detection during decision-making and decision-evaluation

2021 ◽  
Vol 217 ◽  
pp. 103322
Author(s):  
Eva M. Janssen ◽  
Samuël B. Velinga ◽  
Wim de Neys ◽  
Tamara van Gog
2014 ◽  
Vol 543-547 ◽  
pp. 926-929
Author(s):  
Zheng Xiang ◽  
Yu Tang ◽  
Feng Kang

To help air traffic controller at aerodrome better control traffic in maneuvering area, a decision making assist system based on plan conflict detection and alerting is proposed. The most important feature of the proposed system is the module of taxi conflict detection. After an aerodrome controller issues taxi instructions to different flights, the module will detect the potential taxi conflict between flights based on the planned taxi routes and therefore alter the controller. Once the proposed system is used in operation, the efficiency and the safety of the taxi instructions given by the air traffic controller at aerodrome will improve, and traffic operation at aerodrome will become smoother and more efficient.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Simen ◽  
Fuat Balcı

AbstractRahnev & Denison (R&D) argue against normative theories and in favor of a more descriptive “standard observer model” of perceptual decision making. We agree with the authors in many respects, but we argue that optimality (specifically, reward-rate maximization) has proved demonstrably useful as a hypothesis, contrary to the authors’ claims.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Danks

AbstractThe target article uses a mathematical framework derived from Bayesian decision making to demonstrate suboptimal decision making but then attributes psychological reality to the framework components. Rahnev & Denison's (R&D) positive proposal thus risks ignoring plausible psychological theories that could implement complex perceptual decision making. We must be careful not to slide from success with an analytical tool to the reality of the tool components.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Arceneaux

AbstractIntuitions guide decision-making, and looking to the evolutionary history of humans illuminates why some behavioral responses are more intuitive than others. Yet a place remains for cognitive processes to second-guess intuitive responses – that is, to be reflective – and individual differences abound in automatic, intuitive processing as well.


2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (01) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
David R. Shanks ◽  
Ben R. Newell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document