Minimizing minimally invasive surgery: Current status of the single-port robotic surgery in Urology

Author(s):  
J. Garisto ◽  
R. Bertolo ◽  
S.W. Reese ◽  
P. Bove ◽  
J. Kaouk
2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 1121-1127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lesley B. Conrad ◽  
Pedro T. Ramirez ◽  
William Burke ◽  
R. Wendel Naumann ◽  
Kari L. Ring ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo evaluate the current patterns of use of minimally invasive surgical procedures, including traditional, robotic-assisted, and single-port laparoscopy, by Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) members and to compare the results to those of our 2004 and 2007 surveys.MethodsThe Society of Gynecologic Oncology members were surveyed through an online or mailed-paper survey. Data were analyzed and compared with results of our prior surveys.ResultsFour hundred six (32%) of 1279 SGO members responded. Eighty-three percent of respondents (n = 337) performed traditional laparoscopic surgery (compared with 84% in 2004 and 91% in 2007). Ninety-seven percent of respondents performed robotic surgery (compared with 27% in 2007). When respondents were asked to indicate procedures that they performed with the robot but not with traditional laparoscopy, 75% indicated radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer. Overall, 70% of respondents indicated that hysterectomy and staging for uterine cancer was the procedure they most commonly performed with a minimally invasive approach. Only 17% of respondents who performed minimally invasive surgery performed single-port laparoscopy, and only 5% of respondents indicated that single-port laparoscopy has an important or very important role in the field.ConclusionsSince our prior surveys, we found a significant increase in the overall use and indications for robotic surgery. Radical hysterectomy or trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer and total hysterectomy and staging for endometrial cancer were procedures found to be significantly more appropriate for the robotic platform in comparison to traditional laparoscopy. The indications for laparoscopy have expanded beyond endometrial cancer staging to include surgical management of early-stage cervical and ovarian cancers, but the use of single-port laparoscopy remains limited.


2015 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 34-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amilcare Parisi ◽  
Ninh T. Nguyen ◽  
Daniel Reim ◽  
Shu Zhang ◽  
Zhi-Wei Jiang ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 2323-2331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priscila R. Armijo ◽  
Chun-Kai Huang ◽  
Robin High ◽  
Melissa Leon ◽  
Ka-Chun Siu ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 499 ◽  
pp. 248-252
Author(s):  
Jun Sun ◽  
Bo Xiang ◽  
Ping Zhou ◽  
Rui Wang

The single-port gasless laparoscopic surgical instrument is an international leading patented product in minimally invasive surgery. This paper first describes the composition and the usage of the shadowless retractor of the single-port gasless laparoscopy minimally invasive surgical instrument. Aim to meet the specific requirement arise in the minimally invasive surgery for the animal abdominal cavity, we first improve the existing shadowless lifting retractor. Then, this paper proposes and designs the double-light shadowless lifting retractor. The test has shown the designed double-light shadowless lifting retractor has satisfied the design requirement. The practical tests have been done and shown the viability and effectiveness of the proposed design approach.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
John H. Marks ◽  
Emily Kunkel ◽  
Jean F. Salem ◽  
Charles Martin ◽  
Brigitte Anderson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document