scholarly journals Empirically supported substance abuse treatment approaches: A survey of treatment providers' perspectives and practices

2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 699-712 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane M. Herbeck ◽  
Yih-Ing Hser ◽  
Cheryl Teruya
2003 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donnie W. Watson ◽  
Richard R. Rawson ◽  
Solomon Rataemane ◽  
Michael S. Shafer ◽  
Jeanne Obert ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rogério M. Pinto ◽  
Gary Yu ◽  
Anya Y. Spector ◽  
Prakash Gorroochurn ◽  
Dennis McCarty

1996 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-205
Author(s):  
Valery Garrett

Substance abuse treatment has been a topic of ongoing debate in the United States since at least the 1960s, when the country witnessed the development of several promising new treatment approaches. Although costs to society in connection with substance abuse point to a continuing need for an effective treatment system, there is only a general understanding of the field. Several factors make it difficult to comprehend the treatment structure: the field is comprised of a sprawling combination of public and private facilities, it strives to treat many types of addicts, and it employs a variety of treatment approaches. While there are general studies that attempt to describe the system and its components, few inquiries probe the inside of specific treatment facilities to discern their evolution, mission, and effectiveness. This article, which examines the Antelope Valley Rehabilitation Centers (AVRCs), is one such analysis. Located in rural areas sixty miles from downtown Los Angeles, the AVRCs are Los Angeles County's only directly operated treatment centers. The two centers, at Acton and Warm Springs, are not only the first and fourth largest substance abuse hospitals in the country, but they serve a population larger than that of forty-two states, making them an excellent lens through which to view a portion of the substance abuse treatment system.


2012 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. SART.S10389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jayson Spas ◽  
Susan Ramsey ◽  
Andrea L. Paiva ◽  
L.A.R. Stein

Considerable evidence from the literature on treatment outcomes indicates that substance abuse treatment among adolescents with conduct problems varies widely. Treatments commonly used among this population are cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), 12-step facilitation, multisystemic therapy (MST), psychoeducation (PE), and motivational interviewing (MI). This manuscript thoroughly and systematically reviews the available literature to determine which treatment is optimal for substance-abusing adolescents with conduct problems. Results suggest that although there are several evidence-based and empirically supported treatments, those that incorporate family-based intervention consistently provide the most positive treatment outcomes. In particular, this review further reveals that although many interventions have gained empirical support over the years, only one holds the prize as being the optimal treatment of choice for substance abuse treatment among adolescents with conduct problems.


Author(s):  
Desiree Crevecoeur ◽  
Rachel Gonzales ◽  
Richard A. Rawson ◽  
Jonathan E. Fielding ◽  
John Viernes

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document