scholarly journals Characterizing ENDS use in young adults with ecological momentary assessment: Results from a pilot study

2019 ◽  
Vol 91 ◽  
pp. 30-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria R. Cooper ◽  
Kathleen R. Case ◽  
Emily T. Hébert ◽  
Elizabeth A. Vandewater ◽  
Kristen A. Raese ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Ecological Momentary Assessment ◽  
Ecological Momentary ◽  
Momentary Assessment ◽  
Assessment Results

scholarly journals Ecological momentary assessment of various tobacco product use among young adults

2019 ◽  
Vol 92 ◽  
pp. 38-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla J. Berg ◽  
Regine Haardörfer ◽  
Jackelyn B. Payne ◽  
Betelihem Getachew ◽  
Milkie Vu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Ecological Momentary Assessment ◽  
Tobacco Product ◽  
Product Use ◽  
Ecological Momentary ◽  
Momentary Assessment

scholarly journals Tracking Young Adults' Attitudes Toward Tobacco Marketing Using Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA)

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (9) ◽  
pp. 1208-1213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan E. Roberts ◽  
Bo Lu ◽  
Christopher R. Browning ◽  
Amy K. Ferketich
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Ecological Momentary Assessment ◽  
Tobacco Marketing ◽  
Ecological Momentary ◽  
Momentary Assessment

scholarly journals Investigating Health Risk Environments in Housing Programs for Young Adults: Protocol for a Geographically Explicit Ecological Momentary Assessment Study

10.2196/12112 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e12112
Author(s):  
Benjamin F Henwood ◽  
Brian Redline ◽  
Eldin Dzubur ◽  
Danielle R Madden ◽  
Harmony Rhoades ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Health Risk ◽  
Ecological Momentary Assessment ◽  
Risk Environments ◽  
Assessment Study ◽  
Housing Programs ◽  
Ecological Momentary ◽  
Momentary Assessment

scholarly journals Correction: Predicting Sexual Behaviors Among Homeless Young Adults: Ecological Momentary Assessment Study

10.2196/10806 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. e10806
Author(s):  
Diane Santa Maria ◽  
Nikhil Padhye ◽  
Yijiong Yang ◽  
Kathryn Gallardo ◽  
Michael Businelle
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Sexual Behaviors ◽  
Ecological Momentary Assessment ◽  
Assessment Study ◽  
Homeless Young Adults ◽  
Ecological Momentary ◽  
Momentary Assessment

scholarly journals Predicting Sexual Behaviors Among Homeless Young Adults: Ecological Momentary Assessment Study

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane Santa Maria ◽  
Nikhil Padhye ◽  
Yijiong Yang ◽  
Kathryn Gallardo ◽  
Michael Businelle
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Sexual Behaviors ◽  
Ecological Momentary Assessment ◽  
Assessment Study ◽  
Homeless Young Adults ◽  
Ecological Momentary ◽  
Momentary Assessment

scholarly journals Pilot Ecological Momentary Assessment Study of Subjective and Contextual Factors Surrounding E-Cigarette and Combustible Tobacco Product Use among Young Adults

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (21) ◽  
pp. 11005
Author(s):  
Deepa R. Camenga ◽  
Angela M. Haeny ◽  
Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin ◽  
Stephanie S. O’Malley ◽  
Krysten W. Bold
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Ecological Momentary Assessment ◽  
Contextual Factors ◽  
Tobacco Product ◽  
Cigarette Use ◽  
Tobacco Products ◽  
Product Use ◽  
Cigarette Dependence ◽  
Ecological Momentary ◽  
Momentary Assessment

Background: Dual use of e-cigarettes and combustible tobacco products is common in young adults. We aimed to explore how ratings of subjective and contextual factors differed between discrete episodes of e-cigarette use vs. combustible tobacco product smoking among a sample of young adults. Methods: Young adults (N = 29, ages 18–30) who used e-cigarettes and ≥1 combustible tobacco product at least once weekly completed a 1-week smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Twice daily random prompts assessed past-15-min use of tobacco products, ratings of subjective factors (e.g., negative affect, craving), and contextual factors related to activity, location, and companionship. A multivariable GEE model assessed whether subjective or contextual factors were associated with e-cigarette vs. combustible tobacco product episodes. Results: 184 tobacco use episodes were reported (39.7% e-cigarette, 60.3% combustible tobacco product). High baseline cigarette dependence, as measured by the Fagerström Test for Cigarette Dependence, was associated with lower odds of e-cigarette vs. combustible tobacco product episodes (aOR 0.01, 95% CI (0.002–0.08); p < 0.001). Neither between- or within-subjects negative affect or craving scores were associated with e-cigarette use. Activities of eating/drinking (aOR 0.20, 95% CI (0.08–0.49); p = 0.001) and being in the companionship of a person who smoked cigarettes (aOR 0.13, 95% CI (0.04–0.43); p = 0.001) were associated with lower odds of e-cigarette vs. combustible tobacco product use episodes. However, traveling (aOR 12.02, 95% CI (3.77–38.26); p ≤ 0.001) and being in a public space (aOR 2.76, 95% CI (1.10–6.96); p = 0.03) were associated with higher odds of e-cigarette than combustible tobacco product use episodes. Conclusions: This pilot data suggests that unique contextual factors may be associated with e-cigarette use, compared to combustible tobacco smoking in a sample of young adults who use both e-cigarettes and combustible tobacco products. Future research with larger samples is needed to better characterize varying contexts and cues for tobacco use among young adults who are dual users.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document