Clinical evaluation of a chlorhexidine intravascular catheter gel dressing on short-term central venous catheters

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarja J. Karpanen ◽  
Anna L. Casey ◽  
Tony Whitehouse ◽  
Peter Nightingale ◽  
Ira Das ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2822-2822
Author(s):  
Ana Boban ◽  
Catherine M Lambert ◽  
Cedric R. Hermans

Abstract Introduction: Continuous infusion (CI) of clotting factor concentrate has facilitated surgical procedures and intensive replacement therapy in hemophilia patients. The advantage of CI over bolus infusions is ability to maintain steady-state levels of coagulation factors and moreover, to reduce the total amount of factor concentrate spent. CI is commonly delivered through a peripheral vein. However, a significant number of hemophilia patients have distorted peripheral veins which can compromise continuous flow of factor concentrate needed for successful treatment. Also, thrombophlebitis at the site of venous access, an adverse effect of CI previously reported, can further impair the delivery of factor concentrate in CI and make the future use of the vein for concentrate administration impossible or difficult. Use of central venous catheter can ease the application of CI. By searching the literature, we found only a few case reports describing the use of temporary non-tunneled central venous catheters (CVC) for administrating CI in patients with hemophilia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of short-term used non-tunneled CVC for CI during surgical procedures in hemophilia patients. Methods: In this study we have retrospectively studied patients with hemophilia that had temporarily used non-tunneled CVC for CI of factor concentrate during and after major surgery in the Saint-Luc University Hospital in Brussels between August 2000 and April 2014. The indication for CVC usage was a major surgery with anticipated need for CI of factor concentrate longer than 5 days. CVC was inserted by an experienced anesthesiologist in the operating room after the induction of general anesthesia and normalization of APTT. Before the CVC insertion, the patient would have already received bolus of clotting factor concentrate and have the CI started through the peripheral vein. Upon placement, the CI was switched to the CVC. The CVC was kept in place until leaving hospital or cessation of the need for continuous infusion. Results: During the study period, 40 male patients with hemophilia A or B (37 and 3 patients, respectively) underwent 67 major surgical procedures covered by CI of factor concentrate delivered through CVC. Patients, age 21 -81, had severe, mild or moderate disease (33, 5 and 2 patients, respectively). Patients had altogether 65 CVC for 67 surgical procedures. The same catheter was used for 3 surgeries and 16 patients had CVC placed more than once; 14 patients twice, one patient three times and one ten times. Patients underwent orthopedic surgery (79%), gastrointestinal surgery (15%) and cardiovascular surgery (5%) while one patient (1%) had surgery of urinary tract. The CVC were placed in the right jugular vein (58%), the left jugular vein (18%), the left subclavian vein (8%) and right subclavian vein (3%), while the data were missing in 6 patients. Median duration of catheter was 12 days, with range from 5 to 107 days. No CVC was removed prematurely and no malfunctions of catheters were recorded. Moreover, no complications related to the CVC were noted whatsoever. We searched for bleeding at the site of puncture of the catheter, signs of local infection, pneumothorax following placement of CVC, catheter thrombosis, malfunction of the catheter and surgical site infection. Finally, most of the patients reported satisfaction related to the use of CVC for CI of factor concentrate. Conclusions: Based on results of this study, we can conclude that the use of short-term non-tunneled CVC should be considered in patients with hemophilia undergoing major surgery with the need for prolonged CI of factor concentrates. By placing CVC we can ensure undisturbed flow of factor concentrate during CI and preserve peripheral veins for the future concentrate administration. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


1998 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 1452-1457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrienne G. Randolph ◽  
Deborah J. Cook ◽  
Calle A. Gonzales ◽  
Christian Brun-Buisson

Critical Care ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 14 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. P388 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Batacchi ◽  
G Zagli ◽  
S diValvasone ◽  
M Ciapetti ◽  
G Cianchi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 521-521
Author(s):  
ryan Nofziger ◽  
Christopher Page-Goertz ◽  
Bryan McKee ◽  
Amanda Milo

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Niccolò Buetti ◽  
Stéphane Ruckly ◽  
Jean-Christophe Lucet ◽  
Arthur Mageau ◽  
Claire Dupuis ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The potential relationship between intravascular catheter infections with their insertion during weekend or night-time (i.e., off-hours or not regular business hours) remains an open issue. Our primary aim was to describe differences between patients and catheters inserted during on- versus off-hours. Our secondary aim was to investigate whether insertions during off-hours influenced the intravascular catheter infectious risks. Methods We performed a post hoc analysis using the databases from four large randomized-controlled trials. Adult patients were recruited in French ICUs as soon as they required central venous catheters or peripheral arterial (AC) catheter insertion. Off-hours started at 6 P.M. until 8:30 A.M. during the week; at weekend, we defined off-hours from 1 P.M. on Saturday to 8.30 A.M. on Monday. We performed multivariable marginal Cox models to estimate the effect of off-hours (versus on-hours) on major catheter-related infections (MCRI) and catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). Results We included 7241 patients in 25 different ICUs, and 15,208 catheters, including 7226 and 7982 catheters inserted during off- and on-hours, respectively. Catheters inserted during off-hours were removed after 4 days (IQR 2, 9) in median, whereas catheters inserted during on-hours remained in place for 6 days (IQR 3,10; p < 0.01) in median. Femoral insertion was more frequent during off-hours. Among central venous catheters and after adjusting for well-known risk factors for intravascular catheter infection, we found a similar risk between off- and on-hours for MCRI (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.61–1.37, p = 0.65) and CRBSI (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.65–1.68, p = 0.85). Among central venous catheters with a dwell-time > 4 or > 6 days, we found a similar risk for MCRI and CRBSI between off- and on-hours. Similar results were observed for ACs. Conclusions Off-hours did not increase the risk of intravascular catheter infections compared to on-hours. Off-hours insertion is not a sufficient reason for early catheter removal, even if femoral route has been selected.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document