Causes and Risk Factors of Hemodialysis Catheter Infection in Dialysis Patients: A Prospective Study

Objectives: Infectious central venous catheter (CVC) complications, including mortality and care and hospitalization costs, are still a major clinical concern. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of hemodialysis catheter infection and its risk factors among hemodialysis patients. Methods: The present research was a descriptive, prospective cross-sectional study on hemodialysis patients in Babol hospitals during 2020 - 21. The participants' demographic information and some relevant data on clinical variables (namely underlying diseases, cause of dialysis, and cause of catheter removal) and catheter-related variables (namely catheter location, frequency of catheter placement, and apparent signs of catheter site) were collected and recorded directly and systematically during surgery post-surgery. Results: One hundred and twenty-two patients with temporary double-lumen acute hemodialysis catheters for dialysis, including 56 women (45.9%), were included in this study, the mean age of whom was 58.9 ± 16.4 years. Twenty-two patients (18%) developed a catheter-induced systemic infection. There was no significant relationship between the catheter site and its removal inducing infection (P > 0.05). The frequencies of microorganisms causing catheter infection included gram-positive Staphylococcus epidermis (59%) and Staphylococcus aureus (31.8%). Moreover, there was no significant correlation between demographic variables and clinical history with systemic infection induced by catheterization. Conclusions: The rate of catheter-induced infection is relatively high among patients since sterile instructions were observed during catheterization; therefore, it is recommended to pay more attention to the care and dressing of the catheter site.

Practices and intravascular catheter infection during on- and off-hours in critically ill patients

Background The potential relationship between intravascular catheter infections with their insertion during weekend or night-time (i.e., off-hours or not regular business hours) remains an open issue. Our primary aim was to describe differences between patients and catheters inserted during on- versus off-hours. Our secondary aim was to investigate whether insertions during off-hours influenced the intravascular catheter infectious risks. Methods We performed a post hoc analysis using the databases from four large randomized-controlled trials. Adult patients were recruited in French ICUs as soon as they required central venous catheters or peripheral arterial (AC) catheter insertion. Off-hours started at 6 P.M. until 8:30 A.M. during the week; at weekend, we defined off-hours from 1 P.M. on Saturday to 8.30 A.M. on Monday. We performed multivariable marginal Cox models to estimate the effect of off-hours (versus on-hours) on major catheter-related infections (MCRI) and catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). Results We included 7241 patients in 25 different ICUs, and 15,208 catheters, including 7226 and 7982 catheters inserted during off- and on-hours, respectively. Catheters inserted during off-hours were removed after 4 days (IQR 2, 9) in median, whereas catheters inserted during on-hours remained in place for 6 days (IQR 3,10; p < 0.01) in median. Femoral insertion was more frequent during off-hours. Among central venous catheters and after adjusting for well-known risk factors for intravascular catheter infection, we found a similar risk between off- and on-hours for MCRI (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.61–1.37, p = 0.65) and CRBSI (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.65–1.68, p = 0.85). Among central venous catheters with a dwell-time > 4 or > 6 days, we found a similar risk for MCRI and CRBSI between off- and on-hours. Similar results were observed for ACs. Conclusions Off-hours did not increase the risk of intravascular catheter infections compared to on-hours. Off-hours insertion is not a sufficient reason for early catheter removal, even if femoral route has been selected.

Umbilically and Peripherally Inserted Thin Central Venous Catheters Have Similar Risks of Complications in Very Low Birth Weight Infants

In order to compare the complications associated with thin (1-2F) umbilical vein catheters (tUVC) and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants, the frequencies and causes of the non-elective removal of first tUVCs and PICCs were evaluated in 195 VLBW infants born in one hospital. Data were collected from patient records. Risk factors for catheter complications were analysed using logistic regression analysis. Altogether, 92 (47%) infants had tUVCs, and 103 (53%) PICCs. In total, 78 (40%) infants underwent the non-elective removal of their first catheters, most commonly due to suspected infection (n=42) or catheter dislocation (n=30). Infants with complications had lower birth weights and gestational ages than those without. The frequencies and causes of the non-elective catheter removal were similar in the tUVC and PICC groups. True catheter infection was diagnosed in 31 infants. The number of infections/1,000 catheter days was higher in the tUVC than in the PICC group. In a multivariable analysis, gestational age was found to be associated with catheter infection, but catheter type was not. Conclusion: The odds of catheter complications seem to decrease with increasing gestational age, but no clear association with thin catheter type was found.

Infections of Port Access Catheters in Children

Background: The most important complication of port access catheters (PAC) compared to peripheral lines is a higher incidence of infections. Objectives: This study investigated the frequency of catheter infection and related factors in Dr. Sheikh Children Hospital (SCH). Methods: This is a retrospective descriptive study at Sheikh children’s hospital, Mashhad, Iran. The data of children with an operation for PAC surgery were gathered from hospital files and completed by calling the parents. The definition of PAC infection was based on clinical signs of catheter infection and any positive blood culture (peripheral or catheter sample) or the resolution of signs of infection after the extraction of the catheter in the absence of positive blood cultures. Results: During six years, 70 children received PAC, all of whom (except five) were followed by telephone calls. Forty percent of them were younger than two years, and 71.4% had malignant disease. Catheter infection occurred in 16 (22.8%) cases. Signs of catheter infection were fever and cellulitis over the port in nine (56%) cases (pocket infection), chills and fever during catheter usage (without port infection) in six (37.5%) cases, and persistent fever in one patient (6.2%). Blood culture was positive in 75% (12 cases) of catheter infections, and the responsible organisms were Gram-negative bacilli (five cases), Coagulase-negative staphylococci (three cases), Candida (three cases), and group B streptococci (GBS). The success rate for “medical therapy per se” was 68% in catheter infections. The catheter was removed in 22 (31.4%) patients, which was due to infection in half of them. The mean time to removal was 15.3 months. Conclusions: The incidence of catheter infection, especially pocket infection, is high in this population, which necessities revision in all procedures of catheter implantation and care.

Early-cannulation arteriovenous grafts are safe and effective in avoiding recurrent tunneled central catheter infection

Objective Tunneled central venous catheter infection (TCVCi) is a common complication that often necessitates removal of the TCVC and a further TCVC. Theoeretically, insertion of an early-cannualtion graft (ecAVG) early after TCVC infection is possible but not widely practiced with concerns over safety and infection in the ecAVG. With 8 years of ecAVG experience, the aim of this study was to compare the outcomes following TCVC infection, comparing replacement with TCVC (TCVCr) versus immediate ecAVG (ecAVGr). Methods Retrospective comparison of two cohorts, who underwent replacement of an infected TCVC either by an early cannulation graft (n = 18) or by a further central catheter (n = 39). Data were abstracted from a prospectively completed electronic patient record and collected on patient demographics, TCVC insertion, duration and infection, including culture proven bacteriaemia and subsequent access interventions. Results 18/299 patients identified from 2012-2020 had an ecAVG implanted as treatment for a TCVCi. In a one-year time-period (1/1/2015 -31/12/2015) out of 222 TCVC inserted, 39 were as a replacement following a TCVCi. No patient with an ecAVGr developed an immediate infection, nor complication from the procedure. The rate of subsequent vascular access infection was significantly more frequent for those with TCVCr than with an ecAVGr (0.6 vs. 0.1/patient/ 1000 HD days, p &lt; 0.000). The number of further TCVC required was significantly higher in the TCVCr group (7.1 vs. 0.4/patient/ 1000 HD days, p = 0.000). Conclusion An ecAVG early following a TCVC infection is safe, reduces the incidence of subsequent infectious complications and reduces the number of TCVC required, with a better functional patency.