Efficacy for Differentiating Nonglaucomatous Versus Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy Using Deep Learning Systems

2020 ◽  
Vol 216 ◽  
pp. 140-146
Author(s):  
Hee Kyung Yang ◽  
Young Jae Kim ◽  
Jae Yun Sung ◽  
Dong Hyun Kim ◽  
Kwang Gi Kim ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anshul Thakur ◽  
Michael Goldbaum ◽  
Siamak Yousefi

AbstractPurposeTo assess the accuracy of deep learning models to predict glaucoma development from fundus photographs several years prior to disease onset.DesignA deep learning model for prediction of glaucomatous optic neuropathy or visual field abnormality from color fundus photographs.ParticipantsWe retrospectively included 66,721 fundus photographs from 3,272 eyes of 1,636 subjects to develop deep leaning models.MethodFundus photographs and visual fields were carefully examined by two independent readers from the optic disc and visual field reading centers of the ocular hypertension treatment study (OHTS). When an abnormality was detected by the readers, subject was recalled for re-testing to confirm the abnormality and further confirmation by an endpoint committee. Using OHTS data, deep learning models were trained and tested using 85% of the fundus photographs and further validated (re-tested) on the remaining (held-out) 15% of the fundus photographs.Main Outcome MeasuresAccuracy and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC).ResultsThe AUC of the deep learning model in predicting glaucoma development 4-7 years prior to disease onset was 0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.75, 0.79). The accuracy of the model in predicting glaucoma development about 1-3 years prior to disease onset was 0.88 (0.86, 0.91). The accuracy of the model in detecting glaucoma after onset was 0.95 (0.94, 0.96).ConclusionsDeep learning models can predict glaucoma development prior to disease onset with reasonable accuracy. Eyes with visual field abnormality but not glaucomatous optic neuropathy had a higher tendency to be missed by deep learning algorithms.


2020 ◽  
pp. bjophthalmol-2020-317327
Author(s):  
Zhongwen Li ◽  
Chong Guo ◽  
Duoru Lin ◽  
Danyao Nie ◽  
Yi Zhu ◽  
...  

Background/AimsTo develop a deep learning system for automated glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON) detection using ultra-widefield fundus (UWF) images.MethodsWe trained, validated and externally evaluated a deep learning system for GON detection based on 22 972 UWF images from 10 590 subjects that were collected at 4 different institutions in China and Japan. The InceptionResNetV2 neural network architecture was used to develop the system. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity were used to assess the performance of detecting GON by the system. The data set from the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center (ZOC) was selected to compare the performance of the system to that of ophthalmologists who mainly conducted UWF image analysis in clinics.ResultsThe system for GON detection achieved AUCs of 0.983–0.999 with sensitivities of 97.5–98.2% and specificities of 94.3–98.4% in four independent data sets. The most common reasons for false-negative results were confounding optic disc characteristics caused by high myopia or pathological myopia (n=39 (53%)). The leading cause for false-positive results was having other fundus lesions (n=401 (96%)). The performance of the system in the ZOC data set was comparable to that of an experienced ophthalmologist (p>0.05).ConclusionOur deep learning system can accurately detect GON from UWF images in an automated fashion. It may be used as a screening tool to improve the accessibility of screening and promote the early diagnosis and management of glaucoma.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. e0233079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Chieh Ko ◽  
Shih-Yu Wey ◽  
Wei-Ta Chen ◽  
Yu-Fan Chang ◽  
Mei-Ju Chen ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 1029-1034 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lama A. Al-Aswad ◽  
Rahul Kapoor ◽  
Chia Kai Chu ◽  
Stephen Walters ◽  
Dan Gong ◽  
...  

Ophthalmology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 125 (8) ◽  
pp. 1199-1206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhixi Li ◽  
Yifan He ◽  
Stuart Keel ◽  
Wei Meng ◽  
Robert T. Chang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 137 (12) ◽  
pp. 1353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanruo Liu ◽  
Liu Li ◽  
I. Michael Wormstone ◽  
Chunyan Qiao ◽  
Chun Zhang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document