scholarly journals Positional and morphologic changes of the mandibular condyle after mandibular distraction osteogenesis in skeletal class II patients

Author(s):  
Alex Jacobson
2010 ◽  
Vol 68 (11) ◽  
pp. 2893-2902
Author(s):  
Ichiro Takahashi ◽  
Fumie Terao ◽  
Makoto Suzuki ◽  
Hiroshi Kawamura ◽  
Teruko Takano-Yamamoto

2003 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 437-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariko Takashima ◽  
Noriyuki Kitai ◽  
Yoshihide Mori ◽  
Shumei Murakami ◽  
Sven Kreiborg ◽  
...  

Objective To present orthodontic treatment combined with mandibular distraction osteogenesis using an intraoral device and a bite plate in a patient with hemifacial microsomia, severe facial asymmetry, and unilateral mandibular hypoplasia. Patient An 8-year-old girl exhibited mandibular deviation resulting from hypoplasia of the mandibular condyle and ramus on the left side. The patient was treated with an intraoral device for mandibular distraction osteogenesis, bite plate, and hybrid-type functional appliance. Facial asymmetry was improved, and the mandibular ramus was elongated in an anterior and primarily posterior direction with slightly posterior and superior displacement of the proximal segment. Postdistraction treatment results have been stable for 1 year. At the 1-year follow-up, the volume of the lateral and medial pterygoid muscles on the left side had increased. The condyle and disc on the right temporomandibular joint moved well and in harmony at open mouth position, and a rotational movement of the left temporomandibular joint was observed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-217
Author(s):  
Seung-Weon Lim ◽  
Ha-Yeon Park ◽  
Won-Young Park ◽  
Min-Hee Oh ◽  
Kyung-Min Lee ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (52) ◽  
pp. 40-51
Author(s):  
Renato Barcellos Rédua

Class II malocclusion has a high incidence in the population, which may compromise smile aesthetics, occlusion function and stability. Skeletal Class II may affect facial aesthetics and upper airway volume. Class II malocclusion is routinely associated with skeletal Class II condition, having as treatment alternatives the use of Extra Buccal Appliance (EBA) or removable or fixed propulsor appliance. This article describes a case of a patient who did not accept the use of EBA and so it was fitted a Flex Developer propulsor for Class II correction and discussed the advantages and disadvantages of therapeutic alternatives for Class II correction.


2021 ◽  
pp. 030157422110054
Author(s):  
Prachi Gohil ◽  
Sonali Mahadevi ◽  
Bhavya Trivedi ◽  
Neha Assudani ◽  
Arth Patel ◽  
...  

We are in the process of discovery of new vistas for technological advances in terms of various appliances with a vision of making orthodontic treatment compliance free as well as successful. Due to improved technology, the enigma of treating the Class II syndrome is palliated. “Out of the box” thinking has become a norm to treat certain situations that were not corrected in noncompliant patients. Fixed functional appliances are valuable tools introduced to assist the correction of skeletal Class II malocclusion with mandibular retrognathia at the deceleration stage of growth for achieving stable results. In this direction a case series is reported of patients having the above conditions and undergoing orthodontic treatment using a Forsus FFA. Joining hands with technology is a win-win situation for both the patient and the orthodontist.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document