smile aesthetics
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

80
(FIVE YEARS 41)

H-INDEX

11
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 3446-3447
Author(s):  
Sadia Nisar Ahmed ◽  
Nazish Falak ◽  
Iffat Batool ◽  
Kemia Gul ◽  
Arsalan Amin ◽  
...  

Objective: To compare and evaluate the perception of smile aesthetics by lay-persons and dental specialists. Study Design: Cross-sectional study Place and Duration of Study: Department of Orthodontics, Bacha Khan College of Dentistry/Medical Teaching Institute, Mardan from 1st April 2020 to 31st July 2021. Methodology: Eighty participants were assessed for their smiles through photographical imaging to assess each photographic image of smile (frontal view) and categorized them as very good, good, average or bad. Results: The mean age was 20.59±3.1 years with 59 females and 21 males. The laypeople assessed smile under categories of very good (60%) or good with a least number of people categorizing it average or bad. Contrary to this the dentist perception about smile aesthetic was completely reveres. Conclusion: There is an obvious variance between perception of laypeople and dentists with dentist being more analytical and judgmental. Key words: Incisors, Smile, Aesthetic, Smile arc


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 25867-25876
Author(s):  
Cícero Kaio Ferreira Rocha ◽  
Philipe Rocha Teixeira ◽  
Pedro Luiz de Castro Lanzone Breda
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-140
Author(s):  
Lina Hadi ◽  
Valerin Angelina ◽  
Zulfan Muttaqin ◽  
Berliana Sihombing

Aesthetics is a philosophy of the concept of beauty which is the reason people takeorthodontic treatment. One of the factors that influence aesthetics is a smile. Apartfrom personal experiences and social environment, the patient's perception of theaesthetics of the smile after orthodontic treatment can be influenced bycharacteristics. This study aims to determine the perception of smile aesthetics inpost-orthodontic patients based on characteristics. This type of research isdescriptive analytic with cross sectional design. The study population were patientswho were recorded in medical records at the practice of drg. Josep Ginting, Sp. Ortin Pontianak, West Kalimantan Province with a sample size of 30 people. Collectingdata by distributing questionnaires containing nine aesthetic indicators of smilesthrough the WhatsApp application. Data were analyzed using the Mann Whitneytest. Based on the results of the study, it was seen that there were differences inthe aesthetic perceptions of respondents' smiles based on age (p = 0.017), gender(p = 0.004) and education (p = 0.015). The conclusion of this study is that there aredifferences in patient perceptions of aesthetic smile after orthodontic treatmentbased on the characteristics in the practice of drg. Josep Ginting, drg, Sp. Ort inPontianak, West Kalimantan.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-122
Author(s):  
Ankit Mishra ◽  
Ragni Tandon ◽  
Aftab Azam ◽  
Kamlesh Singh ◽  
Pratik Chandra ◽  
...  

The term “asymmetry” is used to make reference to dissimilarity between homologous elements, altering the balance between the structures. Facial asymmetry is common in the overall population and is often presented subclinically. The assessment of facial asymmetry includes the interview of the patient with the orthodontist, extra-oral and intra-oral clinical examination. Depending upon the careful diagnosis the treatment options are selected from asymmetrical orthodontic mechanics to orthodontic surgery, depending upon the patient’s age, primary etiology of disease. When the amount of asymmetry is significant, the problem is usually visible, which has a detrimental impact on one's facial and smile aesthetics. Facial asymmetry in the craniofacial complex ranges from barely discernible to obvious differences between the right and left half of the face.


2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 1809-1818
Author(s):  
Mustafa Elhussein ◽  
Tameeza Tejani ◽  
Ahmad Imam ◽  
Shoroog Agou

Author(s):  
Gema Arroyo-Cruz ◽  
Ana Orozco-Varo ◽  
María Vilches-Ahumada ◽  
Emilio Jiménez-Castellanos

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 40216-40228
Author(s):  
Kerolayne Sena de Sousa Santos ◽  
Cristiane Maria Brasil Leal ◽  
Eduarda Fortes ◽  
Sybilla Torres Dias ◽  
Renato da Silva Repilla ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 146531252110021
Author(s):  
Leonie Seager ◽  
Jinesh Shah ◽  
Trevor Burke ◽  
Balvinder Khambay

Objective: To evaluate the smile aesthetics of the different treatment options for impacted maxillary canines as perceived by orthodontists, dentists, patients and parents. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: Four rater groups were selected to complete the questionnaire consisting of an orthodontist group, a general dental practitioner group, a patient group consisting of patients aged 11–18 years who were considered to be ‘Gillick competent’ and a parent group consisting of parents/guardians who accompanied the patients to their orthodontic appointments. Method: Four digitally manipulated images were created to imitate different treatment options available for the treatment of ectopic maxillary canines including: alignment of the impacted maxillary canine; substituted premolars; retained deciduous canines; or gaps present. The images were embedded into piloted questionnaires. Each participant completing the questionnaire was asked to mark the visual analogue scale (VAS) beneath each image according to their perception of attractiveness of each image. Quantitative scoring of the perceived attractiveness of the smile was assessed by one calibrated assessor measuring the distance from the start of the scale to the marked cross placed on the VAS. A two-way ANOVA (mixed between-within subject’s ANOVA) was used to compare perception of differences in smile aesthetics. Results: There were significant differences found in the VAS between the groups ( P = 0.002) and between the treatment options ( P < 0.001) There was no statistically significant difference found between the aligned canines and substituted premolars images by the patient ( P = 0.2) or parent group ( P = 0.5). All groups most disliked the treatment option where gaps were present at the end of treatment. Conclusion: The patient and parent groups showed similar perception in smile aesthetics for aligned canines and substituted premolars and all groups showed a strong dislike to the presence of gaps. The orthodontist group showed the most critical aesthetic perceptions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 165-171
Author(s):  
Lina Hadi ◽  
Valerin Angelina ◽  
Zulfan Muttaqin ◽  
Berliana Sihombing

Aesthetics is a philosophy of the concept of beauty which is the reason people takeorthodontic treatment. One of the factors that influence aesthetics is a smile. Apartfrom personal experiences and social environment, the patient's perception of theaesthetics of the smile after orthodontic treatment can be influenced bycharacteristics. This study aims to determine the perception of smile aesthetics inpost-orthodontic patients based on characteristics. This type of research is descriptiveanalytic with cross sectional design. The study population were patients who wererecorded in medical records at the practice of drg. Josep Ginting, Sp. Ort in Pontianak,West Kalimantan Province with a sample size of 30 people. Collecting data bydistributing questionnaires containing nine aesthetic indicators of smiles through theWhatsApp application. Data were analyzed using the Mann Whitney test. Based onthe results of the study, it was seen that there were differences in the aestheticperceptions of respondents' smiles based on age (p = 0.017), gender (p = 0.004) andeducation (p = 0.015). The conclusion of this study is that there are differences inpatient perceptions of aesthetic smile after orthodontic treatment based on thecharacteristics in the practice of drg. Josep Ginting, drg, Sp. Ort in Pontianak, WestKalimantan.


Pneuma ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Nimi Wariboko ◽  
L. William Oliverio
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document